The impact of treatment for genital cancer on quality of life and body image--results of a prospective longitudinal 10-year study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of treatment for genital cancer on quality of life and body image to determine patients' therapy-related needs for quality improvement of medical care before and after surgery. METHODS: We started to evaluate women with cervical cancer planned for pelvic exenteration in 1993 and integrated women planned for a Wertheim-Meigs surgery in 1995 before surgery, 4 and 12 months after surgery. Thanks to funding since 1999, more than 400 patients with a diagnosis of genital (n = 185) or breast (n = 217) cancer participated in this prospective study until July 2003. In this paper, we will focus on n = 129 women with cervical cancer. The assessment protocol included objective questionnaires for quality of life and body image (CARES; EORTC; Body image by Strauss and Appelt). The evaluation of quality of life incorporated five dimensions: physical and psychosocial health, marital and sexual status, and medical interaction. RESULTS: Before surgery, women with a Wertheim's procedure indicated significantly less problems concerning the quality of life global score (P = 0.002) and several subscales compared to women with a pelvic exenteration. After surgery, both groups indicated their sexual problems to be the greatest restriction in terms of quality of life, especially in women with non-reconstructive surgery as well as in women with adjuvant radio and/or chemotherapy. Concerning body image, attractiveness or self-confidence was significantly reduced postoperatively compared to the preoperative status for both groups (P = 0.000), and also worsened with the extent of treatment. Worries about the patient's family persisted over time and represented the most important item about all questions concerning quality of life as well as the fear of recurrence. CONCLUSION: This on-going study demonstrates the interferences between the treatment modality and the patient's quality of life, especially about sexuality and body image. Our results suggest not only to provide reconstructive surgery if possible, but also to integrate psychosocial information aspects on future quality of life outcome before surgery as well as to offer psychosocial support related to the extent of treatment modality after surgery.

The physician-patient relationship before cancer treatment: a prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quality of life before surgery for genital cancer to determine risk factors that might influence the physician-patient relationship. METHODS: From 1993 until 2003, 129 women with cervical cancer entered this prospective study. Patients were contacted 1 to 5 days before surgery by a psychologist or psychotherapeutically trained physician on the surgical ward. The semistructured interview included questions on the patient's psychosocial well-being according to criteria of the biographic interview technique. The preoperative anxiety level was evaluated by the STAI and quality of life by the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) and EORTC questionnaires. Patients were assigned to groups undergoing pelvic exenteration (n = 62) or Wertheim procedure (n = 67). RESULTS: The preoperative anxiety level did not correlate with the treatment modality. Women with a high anxiety level complained of a lack of information which correlated with a dissatisfaction concerning the physician-patient relationship (r = 0.457, P = 0.001). Quality of life in terms of medical interaction and the need for information were indicated to be the most important aspects for cancer patients facing genital surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the need for information strategies before surgery: first, to reduce anxiety by anticipating future quality of life outcome problems and, second, to improve medical interaction before stressful treatment options.