A proteomic approach to identify digestive enzymes, their exocytic and microapocrine secretory routes and their compartmentalization in the midgut of Spodoptera frugiperda.

A proteomic approach was used to identify the digestive enzymes secreted by exocytosis and by microapocrine vesicles and enzyme midgut compartmentalization in Spodoptera frugiperda larvae. For this, proteomic analyses were performed in isolated midgut enterocyte microvillar membrane, in a fraction enriched in microapocrine vesicles (separated in soluble and membrane fractions), in the washings of the peritrophic membrane to isolate its loosely- and tightly-bound proteins, and in the peritrophic membrane contents. PM washings correspond to proteins extracted from the mucus layer surrounding PM. Serine endopeptidases (trypsins, chymotrypsins and serine endopeptidase homologs that have substitutions in the catalytic residues) and lipases are mainly secreted by exocytosis. Aminopeptidases are mainly microvillar enzymes and some are secreted membrane-bound to microapocrine vesicles, whereas carboxypeptidase isoforms follow different secretory routes. The results also showed that most polymer hydrolases (such as amylase and endopeptidases) are not retained in the ectoperitrophic fluid (found in PM washings but absent from PM contents). On the contrary, most enzymes involved in intermediate digestion (exemplified by carboxypeptidase and aminopeptidase) do not pass through the peritrophic membrane. Finally, the data revealed that the protein composition of PM includes peritrophins classified as peritrophic membrane proteins, PMP, and chitin deacetylase.

A proteomic approach to identify digestive enzymes, their exocytic and microapocrine secretory routes and their compartmentalization in the midgut of Spodoptera frugiperda

A proteomic approach was used to identify the digestive enzymes secreted by exocytosis and by microapocrine vesicles and enzyme midgut compartmentalization in Spodoptera frugiperda larvae. For this, proteomic analyses were performed in isolated midgut enterocyte microvillar membrane, in a fraction enriched in microapocrine vesicles (separated in soluble and membrane fractions), in the washings of the peritrophic membrane to isolate its loosely- and tightly-bound proteins, and in the peritrophic membrane contents. PM washings correspond to proteins extracted from the mucus layer surrounding PM. Serine endopeptidases (trypsins, chymotrypsins and serine endopeptidase homologs that have substitutions in the catalytic residues) and lipases are mainly secreted by exocytosis. Aminopeptidases are mainly microvillar enzymes and some are secreted membrane-bound to microapocrine vesicles, whereas carboxypeptidase isoforms follow different secretory routes. The results also showed that most polymer hydrolases (such as amylase and endopeptidases) are not retained in the ectoperitrophic fluid (found in PM washings but absent from PM contents). On the contrary, most enzymes involved in intermediate digestion (exemplified by carboxypeptidase and aminopeptidase) do not pass through the peritrophic membrane. Finally, the data revealed that the protein composition of PM includes peritrophins classified as peritrophic membrane proteins, PMP, and chitin deacetylase.

Midgut fluxes and digestive enzyme recycling in Musca domestica: A molecular approach.

Insects are reported to have water midgut countercurrents fluxes powering enzyme recovery before excretion, usually known as enzyme recycling. Up to now there is a single, and very incomplete, attempt to relate transporters and channels with countercurrent fluxes. In this work, M. domestica midgut water fluxes were inferred from the concentration of ingested and non absorbable dye along the midgut, which anterior midgut was divided in two sections (A1, A2), the middle in one (M) and the posterior midgut in four (P1, P2, P3, and P4), which led to the finding of additional sites of secretion and absorption. Water is secreted in A1 and A2 and absorbed at the middle midgut (M), whereas in posterior midgut, water is absorbed at P2 and secreted in the other sections, mainly at P4. Thus, a countercurrent flux is formed from P4 to P2. To disclose the involvement of the known water transporters Na+:K+:2Cl- (NKCC) and K+:Cl- (KCC), as well as the water channels aquaporins in water fluxes, their expression was evaluated by RNA-seq analyses from triplicate samples of seven sections along the midgut. MdNKCC1 was expressed in A1, MdNKCC2 was expressed in M1 and P2 and MdKCC in middle and in the most posterior region, thus apparently involved in secretion, absorption and both, respectively. MdNKCC2, MdKCC and aquaporins MdDRIP1 and 2 were confirmed as being apical by proteomics of purified microvillar membranes. The role of NKCC and KCC on midgut water fluxes was tested observing the effect of the inhibitor furosemide. The change of trypsin distribution along the posterior midgut and the increase of trypsin excretion in the presence of furosemide lend support to the proposal that countercurrent fluxes power enzyme recycling and that the fluxes are caused by NKCC and KCC transporters helped by aquaporins.

Detergent-resistant domains in Spodoptera frugiperda midgut microvillar membranes and their relation to microapocrine secretion.

The midgut from lepidopteran insects has a particular way to release proteins to the lumen, named microapocrine secretion that could be an adaptation to release secretory contents into the lumen at water absorbing regions. In this process small vesicles (microapocrine vesicles) bud from the midgut microvilli as double membrane vesicles, where the inner membrane comes from the secretion vesicle and the outer one from the microvillar membrane. The molecular machinery associated with this process may be recruited by specific midgut microvilli membrane domains. To address to this, Spodoptera frugiperda midgut microvillar membranes, prepared by magnesium treatment and free from cytoskeleton with the hyperosmotic Tris procedure, were submitted to detergent extraction and fractionated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Detergent-resistant membrane domains (DRM) were recovered and their proteins identified by proteomics. Microapocrine vesicles were isolated by washing the luminal surface of the midgut epithelium, followed by freezing and thawing plus centrifugation to recover only membranes. Proteins from purified microvillar membranes and microapocrine vesicle membranes were identified by proteomics. Comparison of the two populations suggests that the budding of microapocrine vesicles surrounded by microvillar membrane is not a random process, because only around 50% of the microvillar membrane proteins are in the microapocrine vesicles. From the 16 proteins from DRM, 14 were enriched in the microapocrine membrane vesicles. These results suggest that on budding, the microapocrine vesicle membrane is enclosed by DRM and a surrounding area of the microvillar membrane. It is proposed that the DRMs somehow recruit the proteins composing the secretory machinery.

Detergent-resistant domains in Spodoptera frugiperda midgut microvillar membranes and their relation to microapocrine secretion

The midgut from lepidopteran insects has a particular way to release proteins to the lumen, named microapocrine secretion that could be an adaptation to release secretory contents into the lumen at water absorbing regions. In this process small vesicles (microapocrine vesicles) bud from the midgut microvilli as double membrane vesicles, where the inner membrane comes from the secretion vesicle and the outer one from the microvillar membrane. The molecular machinery associated with this process may be recruited by specific midgut microvilli membrane domains. To address to this, Spodoptera frugiperda midgut microvillar membranes, prepared by magnesium treatment and free from cytoskeleton with the hyperosmotic Tris procedure, were submitted to detergent extraction and fractionated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Detergent-resistant membrane domains (DRM) were recovered and their proteins identified by proteomics. Microapocrine vesicles were isolated by washing the luminal surface of the midgut epithelium, followed by freezing and thawing plus centrifugation to recover only membranes. Proteins from purified microvillar membranes and microapocrine vesicle membranes were identified by proteomics. Comparison of the two populations suggests that the budding of microapocrine vesicles surrounded by microvillar membrane is not a random process, because only around 50% of the microvillar membrane proteins are in the microapocrine vesicles. From the 16 proteins from DRM, 14 were enriched in the microapocrine membrane vesicles. These results suggest that on budding, the microapocrine vesicle membrane is enclosed by DRM and a surrounding area of the microvillar membrane. It is proposed that the DRMs somehow recruit the proteins composing the secretory machinery.

Detergent-resistant domains in Spodoptera frugiperda midgut microvillar membranes and their relation to microapocrine secretion

The midgut from lepidopteran insects has a particular way to release proteins to the lumen, named microapocrine secretion that could be an adaptation to release secretory contents into the lumen at water absorbing regions. In this process small vesicles (microapocrine vesicles) bud from the midgut microvilli as double membrane vesicles, where the inner membrane comes from the secretion vesicle and the outer one from the microvillar membrane. The molecular machinery associated with this process may be recruited by specific midgut microvilli membrane domains. To address to this, Spodoptera frugiperda midgut microvillar membranes, prepared by magnesium treatment and free from cytoskeleton with the hyperosmotic Tris procedure, were submitted to detergent extraction and fractionated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Detergent-resistant membrane domains (DRM) were recovered and their proteins identified by proteomics. Microapocrine vesicles were isolated by washing the luminal surface of the midgut epithelium, followed by freezing and thawing plus centrifugation to recover only membranes. Proteins from purified microvillar membranes and microapocrine vesicle membranes were identified by proteomics. Comparison of the two populations suggests that the budding of microapocrine vesicles surrounded by microvillar membrane is not a random process, because only around 50% of the microvillar membrane proteins are in the microapocrine vesicles. From the 16 proteins from DRM, 14 were enriched in the microapocrine membrane vesicles. These results suggest that on budding, the microapocrine vesicle membrane is enclosed by DRM and a surrounding area of the microvillar membrane. It is proposed that the DRMs somehow recruit the proteins composing the secretory machinery.

First characterization of fucosidases in spiders.

l-fucose is a constituent of glycoconjugates in different organisms. Fucosidases catalyze the removal of fucose residues, and have been correlated to different physiological and pathological processes, such as fertilization, cancer, fucosidosis, and digestion in molluscs and ticks. An α-l-fucosidase sequence was identified from the transcriptome and proteome from the midgut diverticula of the synanthropic spider Nephilingis cruentata. In this article, we describe the isolation of this α-l-fucosidase and the characterization of its activity using substrates and inhibitors demonstrating different specificities among fucosidases. The enzyme had a Km of 32 and 400 µM for 4-methylumbelliferyl α-l-fucopyranoside and 4-nitrophenyl α-l-fucopyranoside, respectively; and was unable to hydrolyze fucoidan. Nephilingis cruentata α-l-fucosidase was inhibited competitively by fucose and fuconojyrimycin. The fucosidase had two distinct pH optima even in the isolated form, due to oligomerization dependent on pH, as previously described to other fucosidases. Alignment and molecular homology modeling of the protein sequence with other fucosidases indicated that the active sites and catalytic residues were different, including residues involved in acid/base catalysis. Phylogenetic analysis showed, for the first time, gene-duplication events for fucosidases in Arachnida species. All these data reveal that studies on fucosidases in organisms distinct from bacteria, fungi, and humans are important.

First characterization of fucosidases in spiders

l-fucose is a constituent of glycoconjugates in different organisms. Fucosidases catalyze the removal of fucose residues, and have been correlated to different physiological and pathological processes, such as fertilization, cancer, fucosidosis, and digestion in molluscs and ticks. An alpha-L-fucosidase sequence was identified from the transcriptome and proteome from the midgut diverticula of the synanthropic spider Nephilingis cruentata. In this article, we describe the isolation of this alpha-L-fucosidase and the characterization of its activity using substrates and inhibitors demonstrating different specificities among fucosidases. The enzyme had a K-m of 32 and 400 mu M for 4-methylumbelliferyl alpha-L-fucopyranoside and 4-nitrophenyl alpha-L-fucopyranoside, respectively; and was unable to hydrolyze fucoidan. Nephilingis cruentata alpha-L-fucosidase was inhibited competitively by fucose and fuconojyrimycin. The fucosidase had two distinct pH optima even in the isolated form, due to oligomerization dependent on pH, as previously described to other fucosidases. Alignment and molecular homology modeling of the protein sequence with other fucosidases indicated that the active sites and catalytic residues were different, including residues involved in acid/base catalysis. Phylogenetic analysis showed, for the first time, gene-duplication events for fucosidases in Arachnida species. All these data reveal that studies on fucosidases in organisms distinct from bacteria, fungi, and humans are important.

First characterization of fucosidases in spiders

l-fucose is a constituent of glycoconjugates in different organisms. Fucosidases catalyze the removal of fucose residues, and have been correlated to different physiological and pathological processes, such as fertilization, cancer, fucosidosis, and digestion in molluscs and ticks. An alpha-L-fucosidase sequence was identified from the transcriptome and proteome from the midgut diverticula of the synanthropic spider Nephilingis cruentata. In this article, we describe the isolation of this alpha-L-fucosidase and the characterization of its activity using substrates and inhibitors demonstrating different specificities among fucosidases. The enzyme had a K-m of 32 and 400 mu M for 4-methylumbelliferyl alpha-L-fucopyranoside and 4-nitrophenyl alpha-L-fucopyranoside, respectively; and was unable to hydrolyze fucoidan. Nephilingis cruentata alpha-L-fucosidase was inhibited competitively by fucose and fuconojyrimycin. The fucosidase had two distinct pH optima even in the isolated form, due to oligomerization dependent on pH, as previously described to other fucosidases. Alignment and molecular homology modeling of the protein sequence with other fucosidases indicated that the active sites and catalytic residues were different, including residues involved in acid/base catalysis. Phylogenetic analysis showed, for the first time, gene-duplication events for fucosidases in Arachnida species. All these data reveal that studies on fucosidases in organisms distinct from bacteria, fungi, and humans are important.

Role of cathepsins D in the midgut of Dysdercus peruvianus.

Hemipteran ancestors probably lost their digestive serine peptidases on adapting to a plant sap diet. On returning to protein ingestion, these insects start using cathepsin (lysosomal) peptidases as digestive enzymes, from which the less known is cathepsin D. Nine of the ten cathepsin D transcribing genes found in Dysdercus peruvianus midgut are expressed exclusively in this tissue and only DpCatD10 is also expressed in other tissues. The main action of cathepsins D is in the first (V1) (from three, V1-3) midgut regions, where 40% of the total proteolytic activity was assigned to aspartic peptidases with an optimum pH of 3.5. The most expressed cathepsins D were identified in the midgut luminal contents by proteomics. The data indicate that D. peruvianus have kept a lysosomal gene expressed in all tissues and evolved another set of genes with a digestive function restricted to midgut. Digestive cathepsins D apparently complement the action of digestive cathepsin L and they are arguably responsible for the hydrolysis of cysteine peptidase inhibitors known to be present in the cotton seeds eaten by the insect, before they meet cathepsin L.

High throughput techniques to reveal the molecular physiology and evolution of digestion in spiders.

BACKGROUND: Spiders are known for their predatory efficiency and for their high capacity of digesting relatively large prey. They do this by combining both extracorporeal and intracellular digestion. Whereas many high throughput ("-omics") techniques focus on biomolecules in spider venom, so far this approach has not yet been applied to investigate the protein composition of spider midgut diverticula (MD) and digestive fluid (DF). RESULTS: We here report on our investigations of both MD and DF of the spider Nephilingis (Nephilengys) cruentata through the use of next generation sequencing and shotgun proteomics. This shows that the DF is composed of a variety of hydrolases including peptidases, carbohydrases, lipases and nuclease, as well as of toxins and regulatory proteins. We detect 25 astacins in the DF. Phylogenetic analysis of the corresponding transcript(s) in Arachnida suggests that astacins have acquired an unprecedented role for extracorporeal digestion in Araneae, with different orthologs used by each family. The results of a comparative study of spiders in distinct physiological conditions allow us to propose some digestion mechanisms in this interesting animal taxon. CONCLUSION: All the high throughput data allowed the demonstration that DF is a secretion originating from the MD. We identified enzymes involved in the extracellular and intracellular phases of digestion. Besides that, data analyses show a large gene duplication event in Araneae digestive process evolution, mainly of astacin genes. We were also able to identify proteins expressed and translated in the digestive system, which until now had been exclusively associated to venom glands.

Biochemical, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of digestion in the scorpion Tityus serrulatus: insights into function and evolution of digestion in an ancient arthropod.

Scorpions are among the oldest terrestrial arthropods and they have passed through small morphological changes during their evolutionary history on land. They are efficient predators capable of capturing and consuming large preys and due to envenomation these animals can become a human health challenge. Understanding the physiology of scorpions can not only lead to evolutionary insights but also is a crucial step in the development of control strategies. However, the digestive process in scorpions has been scarcely studied. In this work, we describe the combinatory use of next generation sequencing, proteomic analysis and biochemical assays in order to investigate the digestive process in the yellow scorpion Tityus serrulatus, mainly focusing in the initial protein digestion. The transcriptome generated database allowed the quantitative identification by mass spectrometry of different enzymes and proteins involved in digestion. All the results suggested that cysteine cathepsins play an important role in protein digestion. Two digestive cysteine cathepsins were isolated and characterized presenting acidic characteristics (pH optima and stability), zymogen conversion to the mature form after acidic activation and a cross-class inhibition by pepstatin. A more elucidative picture of the molecular mechanism of digestion in a scorpion was proposed based on our results from Tityus serrulatus. The midgut and midgut glands (MMG) are composed by secretory and digestive cells. In fasting animals, the secretory granules are ready for the next predation event, containing enzymes needed for alkaline extra-oral digestion which will compose the digestive fluid, such as trypsins, astacins and chitinase. The digestive vacuoles are filled with an acidic proteolytic cocktail to the intracellular digestion composed by cathepsins L, B, F, D and legumain. Other proteins as lipases, carbohydrases, ctenitoxins and a chitolectin with a perithrophin domain were also detected. Evolutionarily, a large gene duplication of cathepsin L occurred in Arachnida with the sequences from ticks being completely divergent from other arachnids probably due to the particular selective pressures over this group.

Cysteine cathepsins as digestive enzymes in the spider Nephilengys cruentata.

Cysteine cathepsins are widely spread on living organisms associated to protein degradation in lysosomes, but some groups of Arthropoda (Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Crustacea and Acari) present these enzymes related to digestion of the meal proteins. Although spiders combine a mechanism of extra-oral with intracellular digestion, the sporadic studies on this subject were mainly concerned with the digestive fluid (DF) analysis. Thus, a more complete scenario of the digestive process in spiders is still lacking in the literature. In this paper we describe the identification and characterization of cysteine cathepsins in the midgut diverticula (MD) and DF of the spider Nephilengys cruentata by using enzymological assays. Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative data from transcriptomic followed by proteomic experiments were used together with biochemical assays for results interpretation. Five cathepsins L, one cathepsin F and one cathepsin B were identified by mass spectrometry, with cathepsins L1 (NcCTSL1) and 2 (NcCTSL2) as the most abundant enzymes. The native cysteine cathepsins presented acidic characteristics such as pH optima of 5.5, pH stability in acidic range and zymogen conversion to the mature form after in vitro acidification. NcCTSL1 seems to be a lysosomal enzyme with its recombinant form displaying acidic characteristics as the native ones and being inhibited by pepstatin. Evolutionarily, arachnid cathepsin L may have acquired different roles but its use for digestion is a common feature to studied taxa. Now a more elucidative picture of the digestive process in spiders can be depicted, with trypsins and astacins acting extra-orally under alkaline conditions whereas cysteine cathepsins will act in an acidic environment, likely in the digestive vacuoles or lysosome-like vesicles.