Prediction Equations for Maximal Aerobic Capacity on Cycle Ergometer for the Spanish Adult Population / Ecuaciones de referencia de la capacidad aeróbica máxima ciclo-ergoespirometría para la población española adulta

Background: Frequently used reference values for clinical exercise testing have been derived from non-random samples and some with poorly defined maximal criteria.Our objective was to obtain population based reference values for peak oxygen uptake (V?O2) and work rate (WR) for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a representative sample of Caucasian Spanish men and women. Methods: 182 men and women, 20–85 years old, were included and exercised on cycle-ergometer to exhaustion. (V?O2) and WR were measured. The equations obtained from this sample were validated in an independent cohort of 69 individuals, randomly sampled form the same population. Then a final equation merging the two cohorts (=251) was produced. Results: Height, sex and age resulted predictive of both V?O2 peak and WR. Weight and physical activity added very little to the accuracy to the equations. The formulas V?O2peak=0.017·height?(cm)-0.023·age?(years)+0.864·sex?(female=0/male=1)±179?l?min-1, and peak WR=1.345 · height (cm) - 2.074 · age (years)+76.54 · sex (female=0/male=1)±21.2W were the best compromise between accuracy and parsimony. Conclusions: This study provides new and accurate V?O2 peak and WR rate reference values for individuals of European Spanish descent. (AU)

Antecedentes: Los valores de referencia utilizados con frecuencia para las pruebas de esfuerzo clínicas derivan de muestras no aleatorias y los criterios máximos para algunos de ellos están mal definidos. Nuestro objetivo fue obtener valores de referencia basados en la población general para el consumo máximo de oxígeno (VO2) y la carga de trabajo (CT) para las pruebas de ejercicio cardiopulmonar a partir de una muestra representativa de varones y mujeres caucásicos españoles. Métodos: Se incluyeron 182 varones y mujeres, de entre 20 y 85 años, que realizaron ejercicio en el cicloergómetro hasta el agotamiento. Se midieron el VO2 y la CT. Las ecuaciones obtenidas de esta muestra se validaron en una cohorte independiente de 69 individuos, seleccionados aleatoriamente de la misma población. A continuación, se creó una ecuación final que fusionó las dos cohortes (n=251). Resultados: La altura, el sexo y la edad resultaron predictivos tanto del V?O2 máximo como de la CT. El peso y la actividad física contribuyeron muy poco a la precisión de las ecuaciones. Las fórmulas V?O2 máximo=0,017×altura (cm)-0,023×edad (años)+0,864×sexo (mujer=0/varón=1)±179 L×min-1; y CT máxima=1,345×altura (cm)-2,074×edad (años)+76,54×sexo (mujer=0/varón=1)±21,2W fueron el mejor equilibrio entre precisión y parsimonia. Conclusiones: Este estudio proporciona valores de referencia del V?O2 máximo y la CT nuevos y precisos para personas de ascendencia española europea. (AU)

Prediction Equations for Maximal Aerobic Capacity on Cycle Ergometer for the Spanish Adult Population.

BACKGROUND: Frequently used reference values for clinical exercise testing have been derived from non-random samples and some with poorly defined maximal criteria. Our objective was to obtain population based reference values for peak oxygen uptake (V?O2) and work rate (WR) for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a representative sample of Caucasian Spanish men and women. METHODS: 182 men and women, 20-85 years old, were included and exercised on cycle-ergometer to exhaustion. (V?O2) and WR were measured. The equations obtained from this sample were validated in an independent cohort of 69 individuals, randomly sampled form the same population. Then a final equation merging the two cohorts (=251) was produced. RESULTS: Height, sex and age resulted predictive of both V?O2 peak and WR. Weight and physical activity added very little to the accuracy to the equations. The formulas V?O2peak=0.017·height?(cm)-0.023·age?(years)+0.864·sex?(female=0/male=1)±179?l?min-1, and peak WR=1.345 · height (cm) - 2.074 · age (years)+76.54 · sex (female=0/male=1)±21.2W were the best compromise between accuracy and parsimony. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new and accurate V?O2 peak and WR rate reference values for individuals of European Spanish descent.

Prediction Equations for Maximal Aerobic Capacity on Cycle Ergometer for the Spanish Adult Population.

BACKGROUND: Frequently used reference values for clinical exercise testing have been derived from non-random samples and some with poorly defined maximal criteria. Our objective was to obtain population based reference values for peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2) and work rate (WR) for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a representative sample of Caucasian Spanish men and women. METHODS: 182 men and women, 20-85 years old, were included and exercised on cycle-ergometer to exhaustion. (V˙O2) and WR were measured. The equations obtained from this sample were validated in an independent cohort of 69 individuals, randomly sampled form the same population. Then a final equation merging the two cohorts (=251) was produced. RESULTS: Height, sex and age resulted predictive of both V˙O2 peak and WR. Weight and physical activity added very little to the accuracy to the equations. The formulas V˙O2peak=0.017⋅height(cm)-0.023⋅age(years)+0.864⋅sex(female=0/male=1)±179lmin-1, and peak WR=1.345 · height (cm) - 2.074 · age (years)+76.54 · sex (female=0/male=1)±21.2W were the best compromise between accuracy and parsimony. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new and accurate V˙O2 peak and WR rate reference values for individuals of European Spanish descent.

Telemedicine enhances quality of forced spirometry in primary care.

Forced spirometry is pivotal for diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases, but its use in primary care is suboptimal. The aim of the present study was to assess a web-based application aiming at fostering high-quality spirometry in primary care. This was a randomised controlled trial with 12 intervention primary care units (PCi) and six control units (PCc) studied over 12 months. All 34 naïve nurses (PCi and PCc) received identical training. The PCi units had access to educational material and remote expert support. Quality of spirometry and usability of the web application were assessed. We included 4,581 patients (3,383 PCi and 1,198 PCc). At baseline, quality was similar (PCi 71% and PCc 67% high-quality tests). During the study, PCi showed higher percentage (71.5%) of high-quality tests than PCc (59.5%) (p<0.0001). PCi had 73% more chance of high-quality performance than PCc. The web application was better for assessing quality of testing than the automatic feedback provided by the spirometer. Healthcare professionals' satisfaction and usability were high. The web-based remote support for primary care by specialists generated a sustained positive impact on quality of testing. The study expands the potential of primary care for diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary diseases.

Non-invasive monitoring of diaphragmatic timing by means of surface contact sensors: an experimental study in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive monitoring of respiratory muscle function is an area of increasing research interest, resulting in the appearance of new monitoring devices, one of these being piezoelectric contact sensors. The present study was designed to test whether the use of piezoelectric contact (non-invasive) sensors could be useful in respiratory monitoring, in particular in measuring the timing of diaphragmatic contraction. METHODS: Experiments were performed in an animal model: three pentobarbital anesthetized mongrel dogs. The motion of the thoracic cage was acquired by means of a piezoelectric contact sensor placed on the costal wall. This signal is compared with direct measurements of the diaphragmatic muscle length, made by sonomicrometry. Furthermore, to assess the diaphragmatic function other respiratory signals were acquired: respiratory airflow and transdiaphragmatic pressure. Diaphragm contraction time was estimated with these four signals. Using diaphragm length signal as reference, contraction times estimated with the other three signals were compared with the contraction time estimated with diaphragm length signal. RESULTS: The contraction time estimated with the TM signal tends to give a reading 0.06 seconds lower than the measure made with the DL signal (-0.21 and 0.00 for FL and DP signals, respectively), with a standard deviation of 0.05 seconds (0.08 and 0.06 for FL and DP signals, respectively). Correlation coefficients indicated a close link between time contraction estimated with TM signal and contraction time estimated with DL signal (a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.98, a reliability coefficient of 0.95, a slope of 1.01 and a Spearman's rank-order coefficient of 0.98). In general, correlation coefficients and mean and standard deviation of the difference were better in the inspiratory load respiratory test than in spontaneous ventilation tests. CONCLUSION: The technique presented in this work provides a non-invasive method to assess the timing of diaphragmatic contraction in canines, using a piezoelectric contact sensor placed on the costal wall.