Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(8)2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252970

ABSTRACT

Objective. Ionization chambers, mostly used for beam calibration and for reference dosimetry, can show high recombination effects in pulsed high dose rate proton beams. The aims of this paper are: first, to characterize the linearity response of newly designed asymmetrical beam monitor chambers (ABMC) in a 100-226 MeV pulsed high dose rate per pulse scanned proton beam; and secondly, to calibrate the ABMC with a PPC05 (IBA Dosimetry) plane parallel ionization chamber and compare to calibration with a home-made Faraday cup (FC).Approach. The ABMC response linearity was evaluated with both the FC and a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector. Regarding ionometry-based ABMC calibration, recombination factors were evaluated theoretically, then numerically, and finally experimentally measured in water for a plane parallel ionization chamber PPC05 (IBA Dosimetry) throughkssaturation curves. Finally, ABMC calibration was also achieved with FC and compared to the ionometry method for 7 energies.Main results. Linearity measurements showed that recombination losses in the new ABMC design were well taken into account for the whole range of the machine dose rates. The two-voltage-method was not suitable for recombination correction, but Jaffé's plots analysis was needed, emphasizing the current IAEA TRS-398 reference protocol limitations. Concerning ABMC calibration, FC based absorbed dose estimation and PPC05-based absorbed dose estimation differ by less than 6.3% for the investigated energies.Significance.So far, no update on reference dosimetry protocols is available to estimate the absorbed dose in ionization chambers for clinical high dose rate per pulse pulsed scanned proton beams. This work proposes a validation of the new ABMC design, a method to take into account the recombination effect for ionometry-based ABMC calibration and a comparison with FC dose estimation in this type of proton beams.


Subject(s)
Protons , Radioactivity , Cyclotrons , Calibration , Radiometry/methods , Water
2.
Med Phys ; 48(8): 4506-4522, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34091930

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Eye-dedicated proton therapy (PT) facilities are used to treat malignant intraocular lesions, especially uveal melanoma (UM). The first commercial ocular PT beamline from Varian was installed in the Netherlands. In this work, the conceptual design of the new eyeline is presented. In addition, a comprehensive comparison against five PT centers with dedicated ocular beamlines is performed, and the clinical impact of the identified differences is analyzed. MATERIAL/METHODS: The HollandPTC eyeline was characterized. Four centers in Europe and one in the United States joined the study. All centers use a cyclotron for proton beam generation and an eye-dedicated nozzle. Differences among the chosen ocular beamlines were in the design of the nozzle, nominal energy, and energy spectrum. The following parameters were collected for all centers: technical characteristics and a set of distal, proximal, and lateral region measurements. The measurements were performed with detectors available in-house at each institution. The institutions followed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)-398 Code of Practice for absolute dose measurement, and the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice, its modified version or International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report No. 78 for spread-out Bragg peak normalization. Energy spreads of the pristine Bragg peaks were obtained with Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4. Seven tumor-specific case scenarios were simulated to evaluate the clinical impact among centers: small, medium, and large UM, located either anteriorly, at the equator, or posteriorly within the eye. Differences in the depth dose distributions were calculated. RESULTS: A pristine Bragg peak of HollandPTC eyeline corresponded to the constant energy of 75 MeV (maximal range 3.97 g/cm2 in water) with an energy spread of 1.10 MeV. The pristine Bragg peaks for the five participating centers varied from 62.50 to 104.50 MeV with an energy spread variation between 0.10 and 0.70 MeV. Differences in the average distal fall-offs and lateral penumbrae (LPs) (over the complete set of clinically available beam modulations) among all centers were up to 0.25 g/cm2 , and 0.80 mm, respectively. Average distal fall-offs of the HollandPTC eyeline were 0.20 g/cm2 , and LPs were between 1.50 and 2.15 mm from proximal to distal regions, respectively. Treatment time, around 60 s, was comparable among all centers. The virtual source-to-axis distance of 120 cm at HollandPTC was shorter than for the five participating centers (range: 165-350 cm). Simulated depth dose distributions demonstrated the impact of the different beamline characteristics among institutions. The largest difference was observed for a small UM located at the posterior pole, where a proximal dose between two extreme centers was up to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: HollandPTC eyeline specifications are in accordance with five other ocular PT beamlines. Similar clinical concepts can be applied to expect the same high local tumor control. Dosimetrical properties among the six institutions induce most likely differences in ocular radiation-related toxicities. This interinstitutional comparison could support further research on ocular post-PT complications. Finally, the findings reported in this study could be used to define dosimetrical guidelines for ocular PT to unify the concepts among institutions.


Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Uveal Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 147: 30-39, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224315

ABSTRACT

The quality of radiation therapy has been shown to significantly influence the outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. The results of dosimetric studies suggest that intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) could be of added value for HNSCC by being more effective than intensity-modulated (photon) radiation therapy (IMRT) for reducing side effects of radiation therapy. However, the physical properties of protons make IMPT more sensitive than photons to planning uncertainties. This could potentially have a negative effect on the quality of IMPT planning and delivery. For this review, the three French proton therapy centers collaborated to evaluate the differences between IMRT and IMPT. The review explored the effects of these uncertainties and their management for developing a robust and optimized IMPT treatment delivery plan to achieve clinical outcomes that are superior to those for IMRT. We also provide practical suggestions for the management of HNSCC carcinoma with IMPT. Because metallic dental implants can increase range uncertainties (3-10%), patient preparation for IMPT may require more systematic removal of in-field alien material than is done for IMRT. Multi-energy CT may be an alternative to calculate more accurately the dose distribution. The practical aspects that we describe are essential to guarantee optimal quality in radiation therapy in both model-based and randomized clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Proton Therapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy
4.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(1): 250-278, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30721148

ABSTRACT

Ambient dose equivalent measurements with radiation protection instruments are associated to large uncertainties, mostly due to the energy dependence of the instrument response and to the dissimilarity between the spectra of the standard calibration source and the workplace field. The purpose of this work is to evaluate its impact on the performance of area and environmental detectors in the proton therapy environment, and to provide practical solutions whenever needed and possible. The study was carried out at the Centre Antoine Lacassagne (CAL) proton therapy site, and included a number of commercially available area detectors and a home-made environmental thermoluminescent dosimeter based on a polyethylene moderator loaded with TLD600H/TLD700H pairs. Monte Carlo simulations were performed with MCNP to calculate, first, missing or partially lacking instrument responses, covering the range of energies involved in proton therapy. Second, neutron and gamma spectra were computed at selected positions in and outside the CAL proton therapy bunkers. Appropriate correction factors were then derived for each detector, workplace location and calibration radionuclide source, which amounts to up to 1.9 and 1.5 for neutron and photon area detectors, respectively, and suggest that common ambient dose equivalent instruments might not meet IEC requirements. The TLD environmental system was calibrated in situ and appropriate correction factors were applied to account for the cosmic spectra. Measurements performed with this system from 2014 to 2017 around the installation were consistent with reference natural background dose data and with pre-operational levels registered at the site before the construction of the building in 1988, showing thus no contribution from the site clinical activities. An in situ verification procedure for the radiation protection instruments was also implemented in 2016 at the low energy treatment room using the QA beam reference conditions. The method presents main methodological, practical and economic advantages over external verifications.


Subject(s)
Gamma Rays , Neutrons , Proton Therapy , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection , Calibration , Computer Simulation
5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 103(2): 374-380, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612961

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of a single-fraction 8-Gy stereotactic boost after whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer. The primary aim of this phase 2 study was to evaluate cutaneous breast toxicity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4) 3 months after the boost. Secondary objectives were local control, survival, and patient-reported quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and breast-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR 23 questionnaires. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with invasive ductal or lobular pT1-2 breast cancer treated with lumpectomy with clear margins and pN0 were included. Patients requiring chemotherapy were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eligible patients received the planned boost, and 26 had hormonal therapy. The procedure was technically successful without procedural complications. A median of 3 fiducials were tracked, and 115 beams were used. There were 22 acute grade 1 breast skin toxicities, including fibrosis, pain, erythema, or pigmentation. There were 2 acute grade 2 erythemas. Median skin boost dose was inversely correlated with acute skin toxicity (P = .028). QLQ-C30 scores revealed acute dyspnea and arm symptoms without correlation to the boost dose. Breast symptom QLQ-BR23 scores did not deteriorate, although upset with hair loss and systemic side effects of hormonal therapy were observed. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 1 patient had in-boost-field relapse, and there were 5 late grade 1 and 1 grade 2 skin toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Single-fraction stereotactic boost after conventional whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer is feasible with minor toxicities. Quality of life and specific breast items showed excellent patient acceptance.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/psychology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/psychology , Carcinoma, Lobular/radiotherapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fibrosis , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
6.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 19(6): 88-98, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30216702

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this work is to assess eight detectors performance for output factor (OF), percent depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles in a 6-MV Clinac stereotactic radiosurgery mode for cone irradiation using Monte Carlo simulation as reference. Cones with diameters comprised between 30 and 4 mm have been studied. The evaluated detectors were ionization chambers: pinpoint and pinpoint 3D, diodes: SRS, P and E, Edge, MicroDiamond and EBT3 radiochromic films. The results showed that pinpoints underestimate OF up to -2.3% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and down to -12% for smaller cones. Both nonshielded (SRS and E) and shielded diodes (P and Edge) overestimate the OF respectively up to 3.3% and 5.2% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and in both cases more than 7% for smaller cones. MicroDiamond slightly overestimates the OF, 3.7% for all the cones and EBT3 film is the closest to Monte Carlo with maximum difference of ±1% whatever the cone size is. For the profiles and the PDD, particularly for the small cones, the size of the detector predominates. All diodes and EBT3 agree with the simulation within ±0.2 mm for beam profiles determination. For PDD curve all the active detectors response agree with simulation up to 1% for all the cones. EBT3 is the more accurate detector for beam profiles and OF determinations of stereotactic cones but it is restrictive to use. Due to respectively inappropriate size of the sensitive volume and composition, pinpoints and diodes do not seem appropriate without OF corrective factors below 10 mm diameter cone. MicroDiamond appears to be the best detector for OF determination regardless all cones. For off-axis measurements, the size of the detector predominates and for PDD all detectors give promising results.


Subject(s)
Monte Carlo Method , Neoplasms/surgery , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms , Computer Simulation , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
7.
Radiother Oncol ; 127(2): 239-245, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29650404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Platinum based chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With evidence that NSCLC can have a dose dependent response with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), we hypothesize that a SABR boost on residual tumor treated with chemoradiotherapy could increase treatment efficacy. The purpose of this study was to determine feasibility of such an approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective phase I trial was performed including 26 patients. Time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM) was used for dose escalation which ranged from 3 × 7 to 3 × 12 Gy for the stereotactic boost, after 46 Gy (2 Gy per day) of chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Median follow-up was of 37.1 months (1.7-60.7), and 3, 4, 3, 3, 9 and 4 patients were included at the dose levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively. During chemoradiotherapy, 9 patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. After stereotactic radiotherapy, 1 patient experienced an esophageal fistula (with local relapse) at the 3 × 11 Gy level, and 1 patient died from hemoptysis at the 3 × 12 Gy level. The 2-year rate of local control, locoregional free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival was 70.3%, 55.5%, 44.5% and 50.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of NSCLC with chemoradiotherapy followed by a stereotactic boost, the safe recommended dose in our protocol was a boost dose of 3 × 11 Gy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Prospective Studies , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
8.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 609607, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26491679

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to test the behavior of two different generations of cochlear implant systems subjected to a clinical radiotherapy scheme and to determine the maximal acceptable cumulative radiation levels at which the devices show out-of-specification behaviors. Using stereotactic irradiation (Cyberknife, 6 MV photon beam), three Digisonic SP and three Neuro devices were submitted to 5 Gy doses that cumulated to 60 Gy (12 sessions) and 80 Gy (16 sessions), respectively. A follow-up series of irradiation was then applied, in which Digisonic SP devices received two additional fractions of 50 Gy each, cumulating to 160 Gy, and Neuro devices three additional fractions of 20, 40, and 150 Gy, cumulating to 290 Gy. Output current values were monitored during the treatment. At clinical doses, with 60 or 80 Gy cumulative radiation exposure, no single measurement showed more than 10% divergence from the reference measure. The cochlear implants tested in this study showed high resistance to clinically relevant cumulative radiation doses and showed no out-of-bounds behavior up to cumulative doses of 140 or 160 Gy. These observations suggest that cochlear implant users can undergo radiotherapy up to cumulative doses well above those currently used in clinical situations without risk of failure.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Materials Testing , Radiation, Ionizing , Humans
9.
Biorheology ; 47(5-6): 277-95, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403382

ABSTRACT

Collagen model tissues, consisting of cells embedded in a collagen matrix at different concentrations (of cells and collagen) were analyzed. Rheological properties were measured and complementary confocal microscopy analysis carried out. An important feature, corresponding to the breakdown of the collagen network (i.e., decrease in network elasticity) was observed at high collagen concentrations, due to the presence of cells. Thanks to confocal microscopy, we showed that cells elongated within the gel and could remodel it, this being a concentration-dependent feature. A careful analysis of the remodeling process showed that cells can attract collagen in their close neighborhood, this being an irreversible process and that migrating cells create collagen-depleted regions behind them.


Subject(s)
Collagen/chemistry , Animals , CHO Cells , Cell Adhesion , Cell Movement/physiology , Cell Shape/physiology , Collagen/ultrastructure , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Elasticity , Extracellular Matrix/physiology , Gels/chemistry , Microscopy, Confocal , Rheology , Stress, Mechanical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...