ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analizar el uso inadecuado de medicamentos en pacientes pluripatológicos de edad avanzada. Método: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional y prospectivo. Se reclutaron 672 pacientes mayores de 75 años hospitalizados en Medicina Interna entre abril de 2011 y marzo de 2012. Se utilizaron los criterios Beers, STOPP-START y ACOVE para detectar el uso inadecuado de medicamentos, y los resultados se compararon entre pacientes pluripatológicos y no pluripatológicos. Resultados: De 672 pacientes incluidos, 419 (62%) eran pluripatológicos y el 89,3% de ellos presentaban un uso inadecuado de medicamentos, frente al 79,4% de los no pluripatológicos (p <0,01). El 40,3% de los pacientes pluripatológicos cumplía criterios de Beers, el 62,8% criterios STOPP, el 62,3% criterios START y el 65,6% criterios ACOVE. El uso inadecuado de medicamentos fue mayor en los pacientes pluripatológicos con independencia de la herramienta utilizada. Conclusiones: La alta prevalencia de uso inadecuado de medicamentos en pacientes pluripatológicos hace necesario desarrollar estrategias para mejorar la adecuación farmacológica (AU)
Objective: To analyse potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in elderly polypathological patients (PP). Method: Multicentre observational, prospective study of 672 patients aged 75 years and older hospitalised in Internal Medicine between April 2011 and March 2012. The Beers, STOPP-START and ACOVE criteria were used to detect potentially inappropriate prescribing and the results of PP and non-PP patients were compared. Results: Of the 672 patients included, 419 (62%) were polypathological, of which 89.3% met PIP criteria versus 79.4% of non-polypathological patients (p <0.01). 40.3% of polypathological patients met at least one Beers criteria, 62.8% at least one STOPP criteria, 62.3% at least one START criteria and 65.6% at least one ACOVE criteria. The rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing was higher in polypathological patients regardless of the tool used. Conclusions: Given the high rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing in polypathological patients, strategies to improve prescribing adequacy must be developed (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Prescription Drug Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Polypharmacy , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination/statistics & numerical data , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyse potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in elderly polypathological patients (PP). METHOD: Multicentre observational, prospective study of 672 patients aged 75 years and older hospitalised in Internal Medicine between April 2011 and March 2012. The Beers, STOPP-START and ACOVE criteria were used to detect potentially inappropriate prescribing and the results of PP and non-PP patients were compared. RESULTS: Of the 672 patients included, 419 (62%) were polypathological, of which 89.3% met PIP criteria versus 79.4% of non-polypathological patients (p <0.01). 40.3% of polypathological patients met at least one Beers criteria, 62.8% at least one STOPP criteria, 62.3% at least one START criteria and 65.6% at least one ACOVE criteria. The rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing was higher in polypathological patients regardless of the tool used. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing in polypathological patients, strategies to improve prescribing adequacy must be developed.
Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Multimorbidity , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence on treatments of chronic diseases in patients 85 years old or older is very limited, as is available information on inappropriate prescription (IP) and its associated factors. The study aimed to describe medicine prescription, potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) and potentially prescribing omissions (PPO) and their associated factors on this population. METHODS: In the context of an observational, prospective and multicentric study carried out in elderly patients admitted to seven Spanish hospitals for a year, a sub-analysis of those aged 85 years and over was performed. To assess PIMs, the Beers and STOPP criteria were used, and to assess PPOs, the START and the ACOVE-3 criteria were used. To assess factors associated with IP, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Patients were selected randomly every week on consecutive days from the hospitalization lists. RESULTS: A total of 336 patients were included in the sub-analysis with a median (Q1-Q3) age of 88 (86-90) years. The median medicines taken during the month prior to admission was 10 (7-13). Forty-seven point two per cent of patients had at least one Beers-listed PIM, 63.3% at least one STOPP-listed PIM, 53.6% at least one START-listed PPO, and 59.4% at least one ACOVE-3-listed PPO. Use of benzodiazepines in patients who are prone to falls (18.3%) and omission of calcium and vitamin D supplements in patients with osteoporosis (13.3%) were the most common PIM and PPO, respectively. The main factor associated with the Beers-listed and the STOPP-listed PIM was consumption of 10 or more medicines (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.8-17.9 and OR = 13.4, 95% CI 4.0-44.0, respectively). The main factors associated with the START-listed PPO was a non-community dwelling origin (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.0), and multimorbidity (OR1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Prescribed medicines and PIM and PPO prevalence were high among patients 85 years and over. Benzodiazepine use in those who are prone to falls and omission of calcium and vitamin D in those with osteoporosis were the most frequent PIM and PPO, respectively. Factors associated with PIM and PPO differed with polypharmacy being the most important factor associated with PIM.
