Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prog Brain Res ; 264: 323-341, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167661

ABSTRACT

Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique capable of altering cortical activity, has been proposed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio at the neuronal level and the sensitivity of the neurons following an inverted U-function. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of tRNS on vGLUT1 and GAD 65-67 and its safety in terms of pathological changes. For that, juvenile mice were randomly distributed in three different groups: "tRNS 1×" receiving tRNS at the density current used in humans (0.3A/m2, 20min), "tRNS 100×" receiving tRNS at two orders of magnitude higher (30.0A/m2, 20min) and "sham" (0.3A/m2, 15s). Nine tRNS sessions during 5 weeks were administered to the prefrontal cortex of awake animals. No detectable tissue macroscopic lesions were observed after tRNS sessions. Post-stimulation immunohistochemical analysis of GAD 65-67 and vGLUT1 immunoreactivity showed reduced GAD 65-67 immunoreactivity levels in the region directly beneath the electrode for tRNS 1× group with no significant effects in the tRNS 100× nor sham group. The observed results suggest an excitatory effect associated with a decrease in GABA levels in absence of major histopathological alterations providing a novel mechanistic explanation for tRNS effects.


Subject(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Animals , Glucose Transporter Type 1 , Glutamate Decarboxylase , Mice , Peptide Fragments , Prefrontal Cortex
2.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 3123, 2021 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33542338

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique consisting in the application of weak electric currents on the scalp. Although previous studies have demonstrated the clinical value of tDCS for modulating sensory, motor, and cognitive functions, there are still huge gaps in the knowledge of the underlying physiological mechanisms. To define the immediate impact as well as the after effects of tDCS on sensory processing, we first performed electrophysiological recordings in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of alert mice during and after administration of S1-tDCS, and followed up with immunohistochemical analysis of the stimulated brain regions. During the application of cathodal and anodal transcranial currents we observed polarity-specific bidirectional changes in the N1 component of the sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and associated gamma oscillations. On the other hand, 20 min of cathodal stimulation produced significant after-effects including a decreased SEP amplitude for up to 30 min, a power reduction in the 20-80 Hz range and a decrease in gamma event related synchronization (ERS). In contrast, no significant changes in SEP amplitude or power analysis were observed after anodal stimulation except for a significant increase in gamma ERS after tDCS cessation. The polarity-specific differences of these after effects were corroborated by immunohistochemical analysis, which revealed an unbalance of GAD 65-67 immunoreactivity between the stimulated versus non-stimulated S1 region only after cathodal tDCS. These results highlight the differences between immediate and after effects of tDCS, as well as the asymmetric after effects induced by anodal and cathodal stimulation.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Animals , Biomarkers/metabolism , Electrodes , Gene Expression , Glutamate Decarboxylase/genetics , Glutamate Decarboxylase/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Motor Cortex/anatomy & histology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/anatomy & histology , Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1/genetics , Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1/metabolism
3.
J Neurosci ; 36(26): 6988-7001, 2016 06 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27358456

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Classical blink conditioning is a well known model for studying neural generation of acquired motor responses. The acquisition of this type of associative learning has been related to many cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures. However, until now, no one has studied the motor cortex (MC) and its possible role in classical eyeblink conditioning. We recorded in rabbits the activity of MC neurons during blink conditioning using a delay paradigm. Neurons were identified by their antidromic activation from facial nucleus (FN) or red nucleus (RN). For conditioning, we used a tone as a conditioned stimulus (CS) followed by an air puff as an unconditioned stimulus (US) that coterminated with it. Conditioned responses (CRs) were determined from the electromyographic activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle and/or from eyelid position recorded with the search coil technique. Type A neurons increased their discharge rates across conditioning sessions and reached peak firing during the CS-US interval, while type B cells presented a second peak during US presentation. Both of them project to the FN. Type C cells increased their firing across the CS-US interval, reaching peak values at the time of US presentation, and were activated from the RN. These three types of neurons fired well in advance of the beginning of CRs and changed with them. Reversible inactivation of the MC during conditioning evoked a decrease in learning curves and in the amplitude of CRs, while train stimulation of the MC simulated the profile and kinematics of conditioned blinks. In conclusion, MC neurons are involved in the acquisition and expression of CRs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Classical blink conditioning is a popular experimental model for studying neural mechanisms underlying the acquisition of motor skills. The acquisition of this type of associative learning has been related to many cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures. However, until now, no one has studied the motor cortex (MC) and its possible role in classical eyeblink conditioning. Here, we report that the firing activities of MC neurons, recorded in behaving rabbits, are related to and preceded the initiation of conditioned blinks. MC neurons were identified as projecting to the red or facial nuclei and encoded the kinematics of conditioned eyelid responses. The timed stimulation of recording sites simulated the profile of conditioned blinks. MC neurons play a role in the acquisition and expression of these acquired motor responses.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Conditioning, Eyelid/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Motor Neurons/physiology , Wakefulness/physiology , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Biotin/analogs & derivatives , Biotin/metabolism , Brain Mapping , Choline O-Acetyltransferase/metabolism , Dextrans/metabolism , Electromyography , Male , Motor Cortex/cytology , Neural Pathways/physiology , Photic Stimulation , Rabbits , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...