ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To identify the independent risk factors of primary non-adherence to chronic concomitant treatment in HIV-positive patients, and to measure primary and secondary non-adherence rates to chronic treatments, and secondary non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence of concomitant chronic diseases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that included HIV-infected patients with antiretroviral treatmentwho attended the pharmaceutical care office between January and December 2012. The dependent variable was primary non-adherence to concomitant prescription drugs for chronic diseases. To know the predictors of concomitant primary non-adherence, we performed a univariate analysis and a multivariate binary logistic regression model to identify the independent predictors of primary non-adherence to co-medication. RESULTS: Out of 598 patients analysed, 333 patients had a new co-medication prescribed during the studied period. The number of comorbidities per patient was 2.3 and the patients were treated with an average of 3.4 drugs. The rates of primary and secondary non-adherence to co-medication were 8.4% and 44.4%, respectively. The co-occurrence of primary and secondary non-adherence was 24.9%. The number of comorbidities (p=0.001) and co-medications (p=0.001) was significantly higher in patients who had primary non-adherence to co-medication. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant relationship between primary non-adherence and patients treated with psychotropic drugs (p=0.03). The multivariate analysis showed the independent predictor of primary non-adherence to co-medication was the number of co-medications (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: One-third of new concomitant medications prescribed to HIV-positive patients were never filled from the pharmacy. The number of co-medications was identified as a predictor of primary non-adherence to chronic concomitant treatment in HIV-infected population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are currently five approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB): lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. OBJECTIVE: To determine the persistence rates among patients receiving NUCs for CHB at weeks 48, 96 and 144, compare them in these periods, and analyse the evolution of treatment persistence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with CHB who initiated antiviral therapy and were attended to by the pharmaceutical care office between January 2002 and December 2011. Patients included in a clinical trial or patients who did not collect their medication personally were excluded. There were two different analyses: a comparative analysis of the persistence rates in three periods (weeks 1-48, weeks 48-96, and weeks 96-144); and a Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the evolution of persistence. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included. Persistence rates were different in the three periods. They decreased during the course of the different periods, and the decline was more rapid between the first and second period. There were statistically significant differences in the non-persistence of the five drugs (p<0.005). Entecavir had the best profile of persistence, followed by tenofovir. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that high genetic barrier drugs had a better profile of persistence in the initial treatment of patients with CHB. Data seem to suggest entecavir may offer better persistence rates than tenofovir, and the persistence rates for all five medications dropped in weeks 48-96.
