[Renal pathophysiology and pharmacological mechanisms of nephroprotection]. / Fisiopatología renal y mecanismos farmacológicos de nefroprotección.

Several risk factors may affect the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Arterial hypertension, proteinuria, obesity, intraglomerular hypertension, smoking and metabolic control in diabetes mellitus are the main modifiable risk factors for progression. The progression of CKD involves many cellular processes that originate in specific compartments of the kidney, the vascular compartment with nephroangiosclerosis and the tubulointerstitial compartment with fibrosis and tubulointerstitial atrophy, and there may be overlap between both mechanisms. Given the involvement of so many risk factors and so many pathogenic pathways in the progression of CKD, the best hope for delaying or preventing the progression of CKD lies in a combined and multidisciplinary therapeutic approach, based on the existing evidence and acting on all these processes and pathways from the mechanistic point of view, and on a global process that is cardiovascular and renal risk to improve the prognosis of patients.

[COVID-19 and cardiovascular and kidney disease: Where are we? Where are we going?] / COVID-19 y enfermedad cardiovascular y renal: ¿Dónde estamos? ¿Hacia dónde vamos?

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a global health emergency and we need to know more about it. Patients with cardiovascular risk and previous kidney risk have been identified as especially vulnerable for greater morbidity and mortality when they suffer from COVID-19. A considerable proportion of patients can develop a vascular lesion in the context of the disease that entails a greater lethality. Cardiovascular and renal complications represent a problem and, probably in the near future, may pose a threat to patients who have survived COVID-19. As physicians, we cannot forget that during an epidemic like this, other chronic diseases are present, and patients continue to require care. We are obliged to monitor even more intensely their treatments and control degree. Furthermore, we must not forget that urgent situations continue to arise in this pandemic situation and require prompt attention. In this current situation, it is very likely that many patients, out of fear, have not sought medical attention. The situation during the epidemic and the uncertainty of the post-COVID-19 period, requires intensification in the control and monitoring of cardiovascular and kidney disease in our patients. Primary care constitutes a key level of care for the care of the population with cardiovascular disease. Likewise, and in the face of this new health scenario, we need to promote the prevention and control measures that emanate from the studies currently underway. Now, more than ever, we need research, crucial to improve the cardiovascular and renal prognosis of our patients.

[Positioning for the management of arterial hypertension in Primary Care from the critical analysis of the American (2017) and European (2018) guidelines. Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN)]. / Posicionamiento para el manejo de la hipertensión arterial en atención primaria a partir del análisis crítico de las guías americana (2017) y europea (2018). Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN).

The Scientific Societies of Primary Care, being the area in which there is a considerable prevalence of Arterial Hypertension (AHT), need to periodically evaluate the international guidelines for its management. This is particularly relevant when disparate guidelines make it difficult to make decisions in daily clinical practice. The present document has as its aim to analyse the changes and new developments proposed in the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA 2017), as well as in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH 2018). An analysis will be made of any differences, limitations, and their applicability to Primary Care in Spain. Finally, the most relevant available and appropriate information is extracted and integrated in order to homogenise the care of the hypertensive patient, from a critical, but also a reasoned, perspective. The discrepancies between the recommendations in such essential aspects as the management of the disease, require the compiling and critical analysis of the information that enables us as scientific society, interested in providing all PC physicians with the most relevant, and at the same time, sensible, recommendations of all the guidelines.

[Tools to improve efficiency in the clinical management of hypertensive patients]. / Herramienta para mejorar la eficiencia en el manejo clínico de pacientes hipertensos.

OBJECTIVE: To create a tool to evaluate the efficiency of the clinical management of hypertensive patients in Primary Care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was designed for Primary Care centres to self-evaluate the management of hypertension in five specific areas: information systems, diagnostic and analytical tests, organisational aspects, use of resources, and continuous training programmes for patients and healthcare professionals. A committee of experts previously defined these questions and their ideal responses or "control", based on the scientific literature or, if there were no published references, by consensus of the committee. A descriptive analysis was performed on the data, and an adherence score was created that ranged from 0 (no adherence) to 1 (total adherence). RESULTS: A total of 35 Primary Care centres entered their data into the website for the clinical management of hypertensive patients. The highest adherence to the ideal algorithm was observed in the area "Diagnostic and analytical tests" (0.69±0.10), and the lowest in "Continuous training programmes for patients and professionals" (0.42±0.21). CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of clinical management in hypertensive patients can be analysed using the website tool created for this purpose. Its use allows an internal audit to detect the areas that need improvement, and also serves to make comparative evaluations in the different areas of management over time.

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate: a new potassium binder for the treatment of hyperkalemia.

Hyperkalemia is one of the most common electrolyte disturbances, especially among some groups of patients, such as in those with chronic kidney disease, diabetes or heart failure. Hyperkalemia has been associated with increased risks of mortality, arrhythmias, hospitalization and costs, as well as the need to down titrate/discontinue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs), despite their well-known cardiovascular and nephroprotective benefits. Current potassium binders have limitations (slow onset of action, limited selectivity for potassium binding, risk of drug interactions or gastrointestinal intolerance). Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a new potassium binder recently approved for the treatment of chronic hyperkalemia. It is a nonabsorbable, inorganic crystal which selectively binds potassium and ammonium in exchange of Na+ and H+ in the whole gastrointestinal tract, achieving a rapid correction of serum potassium levels (within 2 days) and maintaining normokalemia in the long term (up to 1 year), with a good safety profile (common adverse reactions include gastrointestinal events and a dose-dependent risk of edema), excellent tolerability and a low potential for drug interactions. Its potassium-lowering efficacy is maintained irrespective of the use of RAASIs. In summary, SZC is a new potassium binder recently approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia. Its differences with respect to currently available potassium binders make SZC an attractive therapeutic option.

[Anemia of chronic kidney disease: Protocol of study, management and referral to Nephrology]. / Anemia en la enfermedad renal crónica: protocolo de estudio, manejo y derivación a Nefrología.

The objective of this protocol is to know which test are needed to study an anaemia in a patient with chronic kidney disease, the differential diagnosis of renal anaemia, to know and correct other deficiency anaemias, and the criteria for referral to Nephrology or other specialties of the anaemic patient with chronic kidney disease.

[Medical expert consensus in AH on the clinical use of triple fixed-dose antihypertensive therapy in Spain]. / Consenso de médicos expertos en HTA sobre el uso clínico de la triple terapia antihipertensiva a dosis fija en España.

INTRODUCTION: The opinion of experts (different specialties) on the triple fixed-dose antihypertensive therapy in clinical practice may differ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online questionnaire with controversial aspects of the triple therapy answered by panel of experts in hypertension (HT) using two-round modified Delphi method. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 158 experts: Internal Medicine (49), Nephrology (26), Cardiology (83). Consensus was reached (agreement) on 27/45 items (60%); 7 items showed differences statistically significant. Consensus was reached regarding: Predictive factors in the need for combination therapy and its efficacy vs. increasing the dose of a pretreatment, and advantage of triple therapy (prescription/adherence/cost/pressure control) vs. free combination. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides an overview of the clinical use of triple therapy in moderate-severe and resistant/difficult to control HT.

Documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la patología renal en pacientes con infección por VIH / Consensus document on the management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients

OBJETIVO: Actualizar las recomendaciones sobre la evaluación y el manejo de la afectación renal en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). MÉTODOS: Este documento ha sido consensuado por un panel de expertos del Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA) de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC), de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (S.E.N.) y de la Sociedad Española de Química Clínica y Patología Molecular (SEQC). Para la valoración de la calidad de la evidencia y la graduación de las recomendaciones se ha utilizado el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTADOS: La evaluación renal debe incluir la medida de la concentración sérica de creatinina, la estimación del filtrado glomerular (ecuación chronic kidney disease epidemiological collaboration [CKD-EPI]), la medida del cociente proteína/creatinina en orina y un sedimento urinario. El estudio básico de la función tubular ha de incluir la concentración sérica de fosfato y la tira reactiva de orina (glucosuria). En ausencia de alteraciones, el cribado será anual. En pacientes tratados con tenofovir o con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de enfermedad renal crónica (ERC), se recomienda una evaluación más frecuente. Se debe evitar el uso de antirretrovirales potencialmente nefrotóxicos en pacientes con ERC o factores de riesgo para evitar su progresión. En este documento se revisan las indicaciones de derivación del paciente a Nefrología y las de la biopsia renal, así como las indicaciones y la evaluación y el manejo del paciente en diálisis o del trasplante renal. CONCLUSIONES: La función renal debe monitorizarse en todos los pacientes con infección por el VIH y este documento pretende optimizar la evaluación y el manejo de la afectación renal.(AU)

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This document was approved by a panel of experts from the AIDS Working Group (GESIDA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.), and the Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC). The quality of evidence and the level of recommendation were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glucosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist and provides indications for renal biopsy. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The information provided in this document should enable clinicians to optimize the evaluation and management of HIV-infected patients with renal disease.(AU)

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin after kidney transplantation: is it a good biomarker to assess delayed graft function?

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after transplantation. Its incidence is increased among patients receiving a graft from an expanded-criteria donor. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL), an acute kidney injury marker, could in the first days after transplantation be an early marker of DGF. We collected urine samples from 38 renal transplant recipients on days 1, 3, 6, and 10 post-transplantation, and months 1 and 6 creatinine to determine uNGAL, serum creatinine, Cystatin C, and albumin/creatinine ratio. We divided the patients into 2 groups, based on whether they developed DGF. We observed that mean uNGAL concentrations, Cystatin C, serum creatinine, and albumin/creatinine ratio were significantly lower in the non-DGF cohort on all measured days. uNGAL at day 3 showed a positive correlation with serum creatinine at day 10 (R = 0.58; P < .00) and day 30 (R = 0.57; P = .016) as well as with the length of hospital stay (r = 0.47; P < .00). Receiver operating characteristic analyses performed to assess the potential of uNGAL to predict DGF showed an area under the curve for day 3 of uNGAL of 0.917 (confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.00; P = .00), with an optimal cutoff level of 124 ng/mL, sensitivity of 80% (CI, 62%-97%), and specificity of 83% (62%-104%; P = .001). In the first days after transplantation, uNGAL could be an early marker of DGF, providing additional information to standard biomarkers and potentially helping clinicians to take early measures to mitigate DGF.

Corrección de la anemia en pacientes diabéticos con enfermedad renal crónica sin tratamiento sustitutivo: enseñanzas del estudio TREAT / No disponible

No disponible

Beginning hemodialysis: do patients with a failed renal transplant start in worse condition?

OBJECTIVE: Predialysis management of patients with kidney transplant failure is a topic of growing interest. Herein we have reviewed a group of patients with a failed kidney transplant who returned to dialysis to compare them with patients with native kidney failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 25 patients who returned to dialysis after a failed renal transplant (group A) and 38 patients initiating dialysis after native kidney failure (group B). RESULTS: We did not observe significant differences in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), potassium, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and hemoglobin levels between the 2 groups at the beginning of dialysis. Erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) was higher in group A. Progression of renal disease in the 2 years before dialysis was faster in group A, with a greater monthly decline in GFR and higher levels of systolic blood pressure. Renal transplant patients needed more evaluations in the 6 months before initiating dialysis: 1.75 +/- 0.97 vs 0.70 +/- 2.61 evaluations/month (P = .000). Also, the number of hospitalizations during the years before and after dialysis initiation was higher among group A. Patient survival after return to dialysis at 1 year was 75% in group A and 97% in group B (log-rank; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a failed kidney allograft initiated dialysis in similar condition to those with native kidney failure. The faster GFR decline may be related to immunosuppressive treatment. Transplant patients needed more frequent evaluations and more hospitalizations before and after dialysis initiation, indicating a higher morbidity rate.

[Unawareness of the K/DOQI guidelines for bone and mineral metabolism in predialysis chronic kidney disease: results of the OSERCE Spanish multicenter-study survey]. / Desconocimiento de las guías K/DOQI sobre la alteración del metabolismo óseo-mineral asociada a la enfermedad renal crónica no en diálisis: resultados de la encuesta en el estudio multicéntrico español OSERCE.

Since its publication in 2003, the K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease (CKD) have become a worldwide reference. The aim of this study was to analyze the observance to these guidelines in patients with a glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1,73m2 not yet included in dialysis in a Spanish multicenter cohort. A questionnaire by investigator/centre was completed by 32 different nephrologists participating in the OSERCE study and representing the overall Spanish public health net. We observed that biochemical parameters were measured less frequently than recommended, except in CKD stage 3. The therapeutic goals for intact PTH were not properly reported by 59 % of the consulted nephrologists for stages 3 and 4, whereas only 22% did not report them properly for stage 5. The goals for phosphorus were not adequately reported in 50 % of cases (stages 3 y 4) and 60 % (stage 5). For calcium, these values were 70 %, 73.3 % and 65.5 % for stages 3, 4 and 5, respectively. A corrected plasma calcium between 9.5 and 10.2 mg/dl is still considered adequate for 31%. As much as 87% nephrologists stated that they did not sistematically measure calcidiol plasma levels. In general, these results demonstrate that there is a great degree of unawareness of K/DOQITM predialysis guidelines. Thus, their poor implementation is probably not only due to the lower availability of approved therapeutic agents, the difficult achievement of goals or the disbelief on current recommendations. It would be desirable that forthcoming guidelines such as the KDIGO could also consider the need of educational efforts for CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder.

[Seasonal perodicity in vascular access thrombosis for haemodialysis]. / Ritmo estacional en la trombosis del acceso vascular para hemodiálisis.

Different studies have shown that some clinical events, particularly cardiovascular and thrombotic events, show a regularity in its appearance. The aim of our study was to analyse the possible existence of seasonal periodicity in the incidence of the vascular access thrombosis in patients on chronic haemodialysis. Prospectively, we collected information of 164 patients with 250 episodes of vascular access thrombosis referred to our hospital from january 1995 to december 1999. An ANOVA test for comparison of the means, and a time series analysis were performed. During the five year study the consecutive number of thrombosis were 43, 57, 55, 59 and 36. When the different seasons were analysed, the cumulative number of events in summer during the study period were 91, a significant increase compared to spring, autumn, and winter (54, 54, and 51, respectively; p<0.001). Time series analysis confirmed that thrombolic events during summer showed an increased incidence over the mean (p<0.001), and it occurred every year. The same results were obtained when the PTFE grafts were analyzed separetely (july RR 2.62, p=0.002; august, RR 2.37, p=0.04), but not with the arteriovenous fistulae. In conclusion, this study showed a seasonal periodicity of vascular access thrombosis, with a PTFE graft. Although the causes were unknown, these data alert us on the convenience of an increased attention to the vascular access during the summer months in order to prevent its thrombosis.

[Renal transplantation with positive crossmatch]. / Trasplante renal en presencia de una prueba cruzada positiva.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphocytotoxic antibodies reduce the expectancy of renal transplantation due to the increased risk of a positive crossmatch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the evolution of eight kidney transplants performed in our unit in presence of a positive crossmatch with historical T and/or B lymphocyte positive crossmatches. RESULTS: Mean panel reactivity was 76,6 +/- 25,7% (r: 22-100%), been higher than 75% in six patients. Six patients were recipients of a second or third transplant. Immunosuppression consisted of quadruple therapy including induction with thymoglobuline. Five patients had delayed graft function, and one had primary non-function of the graft. One patient lost her graft due to chronic allograft nephropathy in the second year postransplantation. Six patients maintained a good renal function (serum creatinine 1,2 +/- 0,5 mg/dl, proteinuria 0,20 +/- 0,34 g/day). CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation in presence of a positive cross-match with historical serum and T lymphocytes and/or B lymphocytes, was followed by a satisfactory graft survival.