ABSTRACT
Background and objective The significance of YouTube as a prominent source of healthcare-related information cannot be overstated. Its influence on patient education is substantial. However, despite its popularity, there has been little research into the quality and comprehensibility of videos related to ankle fractures, a condition with increasing incidence rates, particularly in the context of Turkey. To address this gap in the literature and the growing reliance on digital platforms for health information during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this study aims to assess the quality, clarity, and pedagogical value of YouTube videos on ankle fractures for the Turkish population. Methodology A comprehensive examination of 150 YouTube videos concerning ankle fractures, employing exacting inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 52 videos for in-depth analysis was undertaken. The investigation entailed an assessment of content quality, presentation style, and user interaction, utilizing the criteria established by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), as well as a novel measurement known as the Ankle Fracture Content Score (AFCS). A statistical analysis was executed to gauge the educational value and dependability of the information presented. Results The majority of ankle fracture management videos were found to be uploaded by medical professionals, covering various aspects such as rehabilitation and patient testimonials. However, the overall educational quality was suboptimal, with patient-shared videos lacking in depth and accuracy. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in content quality across different uploader categories, except for notably lower educational quality in videos shared by patients. Conclusions The findings underscore a significant need for healthcare professionals and academic institutions in Turkey to produce and share high-quality, reliable, and comprehensible videos on ankle fractures. Leveraging YouTube's extensive reach can significantly improve health literacy among the Turkish public, ensuring access to accurate and trustworthy health information.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term evaluation with electromyography of ulnar nerve function in patients with distal humerus fractures (DHFs) treated with open reduction and internal fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients (20 men and 32 women) with DHFs. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation between 2002 and 2017 with a minimum five years' follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The nerve conduction test was done for evaluation ulnar nerve function. Secondary outcomes were modified McGowan grading system for symptoms of ulnar neuropathy. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 112.7 ± 39 months after surgery. 28.8% (15) of the patients scored in Grade I, 30 (57.6%) in Grade II, and 7 (13.6%) in Grade III on the affected side according to McGowan grading scale. According to EMG results, 40.1% (21/52) of patients had abnormal results. There was significant difference between fracture and unaffected side regarding ulnar nerve motor wrist CMAP amplitude, motor below elbow CMAP amplitude, above elbow CMAP amplitude, above elbow MNCV, and sensory wrist amplitude. Ulnar nerve motor wrist-ADM latency (p = 0.01; r = 0.446) and ulnar nerve sensory conduction velocity (p < 0.001, r = -0.504) were significant correlation with McGowan grading scale. CONCLUSION: There were significant difference ulnar nerve motor amplitude and sensory wrist amplitude between fracture and unaffected side. A mean decrease in sensory amplitude of fracture elbow was found 25% compared to the unaffected side in our result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patient with inter-trochanteric fracture (IFF) treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) aged over 65 years. Primary outcome of study was to investigate the relationship between fracture type (stable or unstable) and bone density. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at single trauma center which included patients aged >65 years, minimum 3 months' control postoperatively, patients with simple fall by evaluating the patient data from 2010 to 2021. All fractures were classified based on the AO classification system. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation was used between 2010 and 2016, while InterTAN was used after 2016 in our clinic practice. For the evaluation of the bone morphology, we measured the canal-to-calcar ratio (CCR) and cortical thickness index (CTI) and classified with Dorr morphology on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiograph of both the fracture side and contralateral sides. Complications were also evaluated on radiological view. Failures were defined as non-union or failure of fixation. Excessive collapse and screw/blade prominence also evaluated by hip radiograph on the 3rd month control visit. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty females and 59 males were included in this study. The average age was 81.6±8.8 years. One hundred and forty-four patients were treated with InterTAN and 65 patients with helical blade type IMN (PFN-A®). There were 78 patients with stable IFF type A1 fracture and 131 patients with unstable IFF (109 patients with A2 and 22 patients with A3 AO type fracture). The mean CTI was 0.469±0.09 and 0.510±0.09 in the fracture and unaffected side femurs, respectively (p<0.001), the CCR was 0.636±0.15 and 0.568±12 in the fracture and unaffected side femurs, respectively (p<0.001). There were 36 patients with Dorr type A, 115 patients with Dorr type B, and 48 patients with Dorr type C in fracture side and 65 patients with Dorr type A, 123 patients with Dorr type B, and 21 patients with Dorr type C in non-affected side (p<0.001). There were 29 (13.9%) patients with screw (n=14) and blade (n=15) prominence. Excessive collapse was seen 30 patients (14.4%) and 16 patients (7.7) evaluated as a failure. CONCLUSION: We found a significant difference in the failure rate between unstable group than stable group which higher in unstable group according to the AO classification. In addition, the mean CTI, CCR, and Dorr index were significant difference in fractured side than unaffected side which indicated lower bone quality at fracture side.
