Anatomical and symptomatic mid-term outcomes of patients with isolated anterior compartment defect repair or stress urinary incontinence : Anatomical and symptomatic outcomes of anterior compartment repair or SUI.

BACKGROUND: An evaluation of preoperative and postoperative 12th month Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) changes in patients operated for the diagnosis of isolated anterior compartment defect (ACD) or Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). METHOD: Patients who were diagnosed with isolated ACD or SUI were retrospectively analyzed at urogynecology unit of our tertiary referral center. All pelvic examinations were performed by the same experienced urogynecologist. Pre-operative and post-operative 12th month POP-Q scores and the responses to a detailed LUTS questionnaire in the unit were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients with isolated ACD or SUI, midurethral sling with mini-sling and retropubic transobturator tape methods was applied in 24, iliococcygeal fixation in 28, trapezoid repair in 9 patients, anterior bridge operation in 14, and plication of pubocervicovaginal fascia to the cervical ring in 15. We compared the POP-Q score and pre and post-operative 12th month LUTS. Between pre and post-operative 12th month, there was a statistically significant difference at Aa and Ba points (p < 0.00, 0.001). Comparative LUTS questionnaire showed statistically significant differences in stress urinary incontinence, frequency, urgency, abnormal emptying, nocturia, pelvic pain (p: <0.001, p < 0.001, p: <0.001, p:0.001, p:<0.001, p:0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Anatomical and symptomatic recovery is achieved with appropriate surgical intervention in women with isolated ACD or SUI. When LUTS were evaluated in terms of symptomatic recovery, they were found to be related not only to symptoms involving the anterior compartment, but also to symptoms involving other compartments.

Anatomical and symptomatic outcomes in patients with Le Fort colpocleisis with or without hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the short-term anatomical and clinical outcomes of elderly patients who underwent the Le Fort colpocleisis operation due to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in our clinic. METHODS: The medical records of fifty-nine sexually inactive females, with stage 2 or higher vaginal or uterine prolapse who underwent Le Fort colpocleisis operations were prospectively analysed. Preoperative and 12th month postoperative data were recorded. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) was also evaluated preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively in all patients. Anatomical success was determined as no prolapse of any POP-Q point at or below 1 cm above vaginal introitus. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in this study. The average age of the patients was 71.67 ± 7.01 (years). The mean BMI was 27.1 ± 9.52 kg/m2. POP-Q point, C (6.70 ± 2.44 vs. - 2.66 ± 1.21) measurements were significantly deeper, as well as Gh (4.83 ± 0.94 vs. 4.26 ± 0.94) and TVL (3.51 ± 1.24 vs. 8.93 ± 1.73) measurements were significantly higher after surgery than during the preoperative period (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). There were no cases of recurrence. The evaluation of LUTS at the 12-months postoperative follow-up revealed significant differences for SUI, urinary frequency, nocturia, and pelvic pain symptoms (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p = 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Le Fort colpocleisis is a simple and effective procedure that provides successful anatomical and clinical outcomes in sexually inactive and elderly women with POP. However, the long-term results of this procedure need further investigation.

EFFECTS OF ISOLATED POSTERIOR VAGINAL WALL PROLAPSE ON LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS.

AIM: To investigate the effects of isolated posterior vaginal compartment prolapse to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). MATERIALS-METHODS: Patients who were admitted with any kind of LUTS and diagnosed with posterior compartment defects were retrospectively analyzed at urogynecology units of 2 different tertiary referral centers. Patients were included in the analysis if they had isolated posterior vaginal compartment defects with no clinically significant anterior and apical compartment defects. The control group consisted of patients with no pelvic organ prolapse (POP). All pelvic examinations were performed by the same 2 specialists. The responses to a detailed LUTS questionnaire in the unit were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 340 women with posterior POP, 280 were excluded from the analysis due to combined anterior and/or apical POP with posterior POP and stage 4 POP. When we compared the symptoms between the control group and the remaining 60 patients with isolated posterior POP, there was a statistically significant difference in urge, frequency, nocturia, abnormal emptying, vaginal winding, difficult stool passage (p = 0.031, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.022, p = 0.041, and p = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with posterior POP should be carefully examined not only for anorectal or bulging symptoms but also for LUTS.

Can coffee consumption be used to accelerate the recovery of bowel function after cesarean section? Randomized prospective trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether coffee consumption accelerates the recovery of bowel function after cesarean section or not. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was designed as randomized controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Ultimately, Group 1 (n = 51) was the study group and drank three cups of coffee after cesarean, whereas group 2 (n = 52) was not given any treatment. The primary outcome measure was the time to first defecation after surgery, the secondary outcomes were time to first bowel movement, passage of flatus, time to toleration of a solid diet, additional antiemetic and analgesic requirement. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic variables between the groups. The mean time to passage of first flatus was significantly shorter in the study group than the control group (8.6 ± 3.3 h vs 11.3 ± 7.5 h, respectively; p = 0.022). First defecation was 20.7 ± 11.5 h for the study group and at 29.1 ± 14.3 h for the control group (p = 0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference in mean time to toleration of solid food between the study and control groups (8.78 ± 2.33 h vs 12.88 ± 4.2.60 h, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coffee can be used in patients to enhance the recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective cesarean section.