Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 13(2): 93-7, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11176015

ABSTRACT

The following study was performed to evaluate the effects of chronic 6-month administration of the angiotensin I receptor antagonist valsartan on restenosis rate after stenting of type B2/C lesions in comparison to placebo. Despite encouraging results of the BENESTENT and STRESS trials, stenting of complex coronary lesions leads to an in-stent restenosis rate of up to 40%. Several attempts at systematic medical therapy (e.g., ACE inhibitors) have not improved these results. Because of the important role of angiotensin in endothelial function, the hypothesis that angiotensin I receptor antagonists after stent implantation lead to a reduction of the in-stent restenosis rate should be tested in a single-center trial. Two hundred and fifty patients with type B2/C coronary lesions were randomized in an open-label study with respect to age, gender, lesion type and indication of percutaneous coronary intervention to a chronic administration of 80 mg valsartan or placebo (beta-blocking agents and/or ACE inhibitors). In-stent restenosis rate according to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and need for reintervention as primary and secondary endpoints were analyzed after a repeat angiogram at 6 months in 99 patients with 80 mg valsartan and 101 patients with placebo. Chronic administration of 80 mg valsartan reduced the in-stent restenosis rate to 19.2% (n = 19/99) in comparison to placebo with an in-stent restenosis rate of 38.6% (n = 39/101) (p < 0.005). Reintervention rate was 28.7% (n = 29/101) in the placebo group and only 12.1% (n = 12) in the valsartan group (p < 0.005). QCA analysis of stented coronary segments disclosed no differences in reference vessel diameter (2.68 +/- 0.26 mm in the valsartan group versus 2.71 +/- 0.24 mm in the placebo group) but significant differences in stented vessel diameter (2.17 +/- 0.27 mm in the valsartan group and 1.60 +/- 0.20 mm in the placebo group) (p < 0.000001).


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Coronary Disease/therapy , Stents , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Valine/therapeutic use , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Valsartan
2.
Z Kardiol ; 88(6): 454-8, 1999 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10441817

ABSTRACT

Ventricular rupture due to myocardial infarction is a well-known but rare complication. Since the introduction of thrombolytics or acute PTCA in the management of acute myocardial infarction, the frequency of this complication has further decreased. A case of lethal ventricular rupture in the course of acute stenting for myocardial infarction, acute stent thrombosis 7 hours after successful intervention, and successful reintervention with intracoronary administration of abciximab is reported. Myocardial rupture as a severe form of reperfusion injury is discussed.


Subject(s)
Coronary Thrombosis/diagnosis , Heart Rupture, Post-Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/diagnosis , Stents , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Coronary Angiography , Fatal Outcome , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...