Does plate-screw density affect the functional outcomes in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between plate-screw density (PSD), functional results, and complication rates in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with proximal humerus locking anatomical plate (PHLAP). METHODS: Consecutive 43 patients (22 females and 21 males) who underwent PHLAP for the treatment of PHF between 2010 and 2016 were evaluated. AO classifications were used for the classification of fractures. Based on the biomechanical stability the-ory of Erhardt et al., the patients were divided into two groups as <60% and >60% according to the number of screws fixed to the humeral head for the determination of PSD. The patients were divided into two groups as PSD <60% (n=21) and PSD>60% (n=22) according to the number of screws fixed to the humeral head for the determination of PSD. Functional results were evaluated using the Constant-Murley shoulder score (CMS). Radiological evaluation was performed with collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), varus-valgus angulation, avascular necrosis (AVN), and arthrosis. The groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, functional results, radiological scores, and complications. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.47±17.43 years and the mean follow-up time was 19.51±5.27 months. Although the CMS scores of patients with a PSD of over 60% were higher than those below 60%, the CMS score did not differ statistically. In groups, the mean CDA of the operated shoulder was significantly lower than that of the non-injured side (p=0.002). Eight patients had varus angulation, whereas two patients had humerus head AVN. No significant relationship was observed between PDS and functional scores, radiolog-ical results, and complications. CONCLUSION: Functional results of PSD >60% are higher than PSD <60% group but there is no statistical difference between groups according to functional, radiological results, and complications.

Which external fixation method is better for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures due to gunshot injury?

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of AO type monolateral external fixator (AO-EF) and Ilizarov type external fixator (I-EF) in definitive fixation of tibial shaft fractures due to gunshot injury. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing I-EF would have faster fracture healing with the help of early weight-bearing and the functional scores would be better compared to AO-EF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consisted of 76 (67M, 9F) patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2016 for tibial shaft fracture due to low-velocity gunshot injury (LVGI). The patients were divided into two groups according to the fixation method (AO-EF and I-EF) which was discussed by the surgeon team due to their experience. The average age at the time of injury was 37.8±9.8 (20 to 59 years). Groups are compared according to LEFS score, coronal-sagittal-rotational angle, Johner-Rush score, and complications such as nonunion, malunion, osteomyelitis, and pin-tract infection. The mean follow-up time 31.61±3.83 months (between 24 and 44 months). RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between groups in terms of demographic characteristics. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding body mass index (BMI). LEFS score and operation duration were higher in the I-EF group (p=0.000 and p=0.006 respectively, p˂0.05). In the I-EF group, hospitalization period, full weight-bearing time, and healing time was shorter than the AO-EF group (p=0.001, p=0.000, and p=0.025 respectively, p˂0.05). DISCUSSION: Although AO-EF has advantages such as ease of application and short surgery time in the definitive fixation of LVGI tibia shaft fractures, I-EF is a superior technique in terms of functional scores. However, I-EF is a surgical approach that requires relatively more experience. Therefore, the choice of fixator should be determined according to the surgeon's experience in the permanent treatment of LVGI tibial shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective, case-control study.