Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients Underwent Endobronchial Ultrasound-Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

Objectives: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been recognized as the first method of choice in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lesions. Although the procedure is commonly used, there is no study assessing its contribution to the duration required for diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine the extent of diagnosis and treatment delays when using the EBUS-TBNA procedure and to address the possible factors contributing to these delays. Materials and Methods: The demographic data, pathological diagnosis, need for additional procedures, symptoms, presenting complaints, and the time until the beginning of treatment were recorded retrospectively in all patients who had undergone EBUS-TBNA. Results: A total of 134 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 12 years, M/F: 78/56) were included. Delay of the patients was found in 60.4% (n = 81), delayed referral in 35.8% (n = 48), diagnosis delays in 84.3% (n = 113), treatment delays in 38.8% (n = 52), and total delay in 73.1% (n = 98) of the patients. A statistically significant association was found between referral delay and total delay with age groups (p=0.006) and between patient delay and the presence of symptoms (p=0.027). EBUS-TBNA was found to have the lowest effect among all delay parameters (ß: 0.104, p < 0.001) in the regression analysis. When diagnosis times' subgroups were compared, EBUS-TBNA was found to have the least effect (correlation coefficient: 0.134, p=0.004). Conclusion: We found that approximately ¾ of the patients had a delay and this is not acceptable in real terms. Considering that the patient burden is increasing day by day, it is necessary to make a radical change in health care or a change in strategy in order to prevent delays. EBUS-TBNA, which is in the diagnosis delay subgroup, is less invasive and accelerates the process.

Management of spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia may cause cystic features of lung parenchyma which can resolve or progress to larger blebs. Pneumothorax was more likely in patients with neutrophilia, severe lung injury and a prolonged clinical course. The timely diagnosis and management will reduce COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We present 11 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax managed with chest tube thoracostomy or high-dose oxygen therapy. Isolated spontaneous pneumothorax was detected in all cases. RESULTS: Eight cases were male and 3 cases were female. There were bilateral ground-glass opacities or pulmonary infiltrates in the parenchyma of the 10 cases. We detected neutrophilia, lymphopaenia and increased C-reactive protein, Ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, D-Dimer, interleukin-6 levels in almost all cases. Chest tube thoracostomy was sufficient to treat pneumothorax in our 9 of case. In 2 cases, pneumothorax healed with high-dose oxygen therapy. Favipiravir and antibiotic treatment were given to different 10 patients. In our institution, all patients with COVID-19 infection were placed on prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation, unless contraindicated. The treatments of patients diagnosed with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax during the pandemic period and those diagnosed with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in the previous 3 years were compared with the durations of tube thoracostomy performed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increased number of cases of pneumothorax suggests that pneumothorax may be a complication of COVID-19 infection. During medical treatment of COVID-19, pneumothorax may be the only reason for hospitalization. Although tube thoracostomy is a sufficient treatment option in most cases, clinicians should be aware of the difficulties that may arise in diagnosis and treatment.