ABSTRACT
Background: Symptomatic obturator nerve endometriosis is a rare condition. In this paper, we aim to review and discuss the characteristics of obturator nerve endometriosis in light of current literature. Methods: An electronic search was conducted using the PubMed/Medline database. Results: Symptomatic obturator nerve endometriosis is rare; only 8 cases have been reported in the literature. Symptoms including difficulty walking, weak thigh adduction and pain in the inner thigh, which are all related to obturator nerve function, could be seen in the case of the entrapment of the nerve by endometrial nodules. A history of recurrent symptoms during menstrual cycles and physical examination, combined with appropriate radiologic imaging, led to a suspicion of obturator nerve involvement. Conclusion: Early diagnosis and surgical treatment of obturator nerve endometriosis is essential to minimise the nerve damage caused by recurrent cycles of bleeding and fibrosis, which are characteristics of endometriosis. The laparoscopic minimally invasive technique is feasible for the surgery of obturator nerve endometriosis. It offers the advantage of precise discrimination of vital structures and excellent access to deep anatomic sites. What is New?: Obturator nerve endometriosis may be a severe cause of chronic pelvic pain in women of reproductive age. Treatment may be achieved surgically and in experienced hands, laparoscopic surgery would be the preferred choice.
ABSTRACT
Background: Spinal anaesthesia has not been widely adopted for laparoscopic surgeries until now. There are a few studies that have shown that spinal anaesthesia is at least as safe as general anaesthesia. The need for additional analgesics can be reduced by utilising early postoperative analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, and maximum benefit can be obtained from minimally invasive approaches when V-NOTES surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia. Objective: Combining V-NOTES with spinal anaesthesia to improve minimally invasive surgical techniques and provide maximum benefit to patients. Materials and Methods: Patients who were found to have benign pelvic organ pathologies, required a hysterectomy and were considered suitable for V-NOTES hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with 12.5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position. Perioperative events and complications related to spinal anaesthesia were noted. Postoperatively, the pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale at the 6th, 12th, and 24th hours. Main outcome measures: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of spinal anaesthesia in VNOTES hysterectomy and to increase the advantages of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Results: No conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was required in all six operated patients. Conversion from spinal anaesthesia to general anaesthesia was unnecessary, and no major perioperative incident occurred in any of the cases. Conclusion: In the current study by our team, we demonstrated that V-NOTES hysterectomy could be performed safely under spinal anaesthesia in well-selected patients. The need for additional analgesics can be reduced by utilising early postoperative analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, and maximum benefit can be obtained from minimally invasive approaches when VNOTES surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia. What is new?: V-NOTES hysterectomy could be performed safely under spinal anaesthesia in well-selected patients.
