ABSTRACT
Sole del(7p) is a rare finding in myeloid neoplasms and its clinical significance is largely unknown. Here we report 10 patients with isolated del(7p), 4 had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 2 myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 1 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), 1 primary myelofibrosis (PMF), and 2 AML in remission. Seven patients had large and 3 had small del(7p) clone. For patients with AML, 3 acquired del(7p) either at disease relapse or disease progression, then became refractory to therapy and died shortly thereafter (median 5 months). Detection of del(7p) in patients with MDS, CMML, or PMF appeared to predict poorer prognosis as all 4 patients experienced disease progression or transformation to AML after 5-24 months. In the remaining 3 patients (1 AML and 2 AML in remission), del(7p) was only detected in 10% to 30% of metaphases and was a transient finding that did not appear to have any clinical impact. We conclude that detection of del(7p) in myeloid neoplasms, when presents as a major clone, often poses a high risk for disease progression and refractoriness to therapy; whereas when del(7p) presents as a small clone, it may not carry any clinical significance.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Primary Myelofibrosis/genetics , Adult , Aged , Clone Cells , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/diagnosis , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnosis , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the relation between biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer and the extent of positive surgical margins (PSMs), Gleason score (GS) of the tumor at the margins, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 94 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were recruited for this study and received postoperative follow-up care for 2 years. All specimens were evaluated for surgical margin status, PSM length, GS at positive margin, size of tumor, multifocality, invasion of seminal vesicle, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. PSM was defined as a prostate tumor. RESULTS: Out of 94 patients, 34 patients (36.2%) had PSMs and 46 patients (48.9%) had BCR. A statistically significant relation between having a high risk of BCR of prostate cancer and having high preoperative PSA levels (P < 0.001), PSMs (P < 0.001), or a high GS at the surgical margin (P = 0.024) was found. CONCLUSION: High preoperative PSA levels, PSMs, and tumors with high GS at the margins have a poor prognostic impact, and they correlate with a higher rate of BCR. Close follow-up of patients with PSMs with high GS and high levels of preoperative PSA is recommended.
