Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Medeni Med J ; 37(4): 320-326, 2022 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36578149

ABSTRACT

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious health problem that is related to an increased mortality. In cases of severe TBI, the prediction of prognosis is essential. The enlargement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) shows an increased intracranial pressure and is associated with poor outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ONSD in patients with severe TBI. Methods: Forty-four patients with severe TBI were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: survivors (n=17) and non-survivors (n=27). Baseline characteristics, clinical data, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) on hospital admission, brain computed tomography (CT) results, injury severity score (ISS), and Marshall score were recorded for all patients. ONSD was calculated at 3 mm distance from the globe, immediately below the sclera. Results: The ONSD on the initial CT was significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors (6.83±1.40 vs. 6.40±1.36, p<0.05). In addition, ISS and Marshall score were significantly higher, whereas GCS was significantly lower in non-survivors. ONSD was positively correlated with Marshall score (r=0.332, p<0.05). Receiver operating characteristics analysis demonstrated that ONSD ≥6.61 had a sensitivity of 70.4% and specificity of 64.7% for predicting mortality. It was shown that ONSD ≥6.61 had a 4.3-fold increased risk for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 4.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.195-15.865; p<0.05). Conclusions: The enlargement of ONSD on initial CT was detected to be associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI.

2.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 49(3): 91-99, mayo 2021. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-214269

ABSTRACT

Introduction and Objectives: There are a few reports in the literature about the successful use of sugammadex in the treatment of hypersensitivity reactions caused by rocuronium; however, the pathophysiological mechanism is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the changes caused by rocuronium in the lung and the effect of sugammadex on these changes with biochemical, light microscopic and immunohistochemical parameters on a rat model. Materials and Methods: For the study, 28-male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided, seven of each, into four groups. Group C (control) received only 0. 9 % NaCl without any drug. Group R received rocuronium alone 1mg/kg. Group S received sugammadex alone 96 mg/kg. Group RS received rocuronium 1mg/kg and sugammadex 96 mg/kg. After 24 h later, the animals were sacrificed and their tissues were removed. Biochemical (IgE/CRP), light microscopic and immunohistochemical findings were recorded. Results: Immunoglobulin E and CRP levels, peribronchial, alveolar septal lymphocytic infiltration, thickening of the alveolar membranes and bleeding sites in Group R were significantly higher than all the other groups. In Group RS, while these parameters were significantly lower than that of Group R and Group S, it was significantly higher than that of Group C. Total mast cells and tryptase-positive mast cells counts were significantly higher in Group R than in all other groups. In Group RS, these parameters were statistically lower than that of Group R and Group S, but higher than that of Group C. Conclusions: This study shows that allergic inflammatory changes due to rocuronium in the lungs of rats are reduced with sugammadex. These results support cases of anaphylaxis due to rocuronium which improved with sugammadex (AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Hypersensitivity/complications , Inflammation/prevention & control , Lung/drug effects , Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents/adverse effects , Rocuronium/adverse effects , Sugammadex/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Disease Models, Animal , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
3.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 26(3): 418-424, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is performed in the management of intracranial hyper-tension after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims to investigate the effects of transcranial Dop-pler ultrasonography (TCD) measurements on the indication of decompressive surgery. METHODS: Sixteen TBI patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) <9 were included in this study. Intra-cranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) measurements were recorded continuously. DC was performed according to the records of ICP and TCD. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores were evaluated after three months. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 31.18±17.51; GCS ranged between three and 14 with a mean of 9.62±3.95. Mean GOS was 3.12±1.85. Craniectomy was performed in two patients (12.5%) and cra-niectomy and lobectomy together were performed in 14 (87.5%) of them. The decline in ICP (22.12±10.41, 22.62±7.35, 15.50±6.64) and pulsatility index (PI) (1.96±1.10, 1.64±0.75, 1.91±2.48) were strongly significant between days 3-5, and 1-5. The range of PI and Vmax values through five days did not present any significance. CONCLUSION: TCD, as a real-time monitor, may help for an early decision of surgical approach in the management of TBI patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Decompressive Craniectomy , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnostic imaging , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/physiopathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery , Glasgow Outcome Scale , Humans , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Young Adult
4.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 45(2): 340-346, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31802525

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Adenotonsillectomies are common surgical procedures performed under general anaesthesia in childhood. Post-operative pain and agitation are complications associated with this procedure. We compared the effects of dexmedetomidine and tramadol on post-operative pain, agitation, haemodynamic parameters, and extubation quality in patients undergoing an adenotonsillectomy using sevoflurane as an anaesthetic agent. METHODS: Sixty paediatric patients who had undergone an adenotonsillectomy were included in this study. The patients were randomized into two groups that received either dexmedetomidine (n = 30) or tramadol (n = 30). Haemodynamic variables, extubation time, post-operative pain, agitation and adverse events were recorded for all patients. Post-operative pain was assessed with the pain point system scale (PPSS), and agitation was assessed using the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS). RESULTS: Patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly lower heart rates than the tramadol group. In addition, patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly lower post-operative PPSS and Riker SAS scores than patients in the tramadol group. Not breathing, cough-bucking and desaturation after extubation occurred less frequently in patients who received dexmedetomidine than in patients who received tramadol. However, the time to extubation was significantly longer for patients who received dexmedetomidine. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that dexmedetomidine was more effective than tramadol for mitigating post-operative pain and agitation in paediatric patients following an adenotonsillectomy with sevoflurane. Although dexmedetomidine was associated with a longer time to extubation, it was also associated with fewer complications following extubation compared with tramadol.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Emergence Delirium/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Adenoidectomy/methods , Airway Extubation/methods , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Anesthesia, General , Child , Child, Preschool , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Tonsillectomy/methods , Tramadol/adverse effects
6.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 44(2): 312-317, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30635940

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The most appropriate sedative agent for conscious sedation in minor hysteroscopic surgeries is still unclear. Dexmedetomidine a sedative and analgesic agent, may be appropriate for outpatient procedures. The aim of our study was to compare the sedative, analgesic and hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine vs propofol in combination with fentanyl and midazolam in patients undergoing minor hysteroscopy surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing minor hysteroscopic surgery were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (n = 30) or propofol (n = 30) groups. Dexmedetomidine was infused at 1 µg/kg for 10 minutes followed by a 0.7 µg/kg/h maintenance infusion. Propofol was infused a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg followed by a 2.5 mg/kg/h maintenance infusion. Fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg and midazolam 0.03 mg/kg were performed to all patients as premedication therapy before the hysteroscopic surgery. Post-operative pain score was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS). Hemodynamic variables and Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) scores were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower than in propofol group, whereas SpO2 was similar between two groups. In addition, post-operative Riker SAS and VAS scores were significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group than in the propofol group. Bradycardia, hypotension and serious adverse events did not occur in any patients. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine was associated with better analgesia and lower post-operative pain score than propofol in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery. However, arterial pressure and heart rate should be more closely monitored in patients received dexmedetomidine.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hysteroscopy/methods , Propofol/administration & dosage , Adult , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Conscious Sedation/methods , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Propofol/adverse effects , Propofol/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...