Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Turk J Pediatr ; 48(1): 31-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16562783

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to assess the validity of the International Classification of Headache Disorders-I (ICHD-I) and the International Headache Society-Revised (IHS-R) criteria and to evaluate the other headache features that are not included in these criteria for migraine without aura in the pediatric population. One hundred and thirty-two children who referred to our clinic with the complaint of chronic or recurrent headache were evaluated. Clinical diagnosis of the pediatric neurologist was used as the gold standard in evaluating the validity of ICHD-I and IHS-R criteria and the other headache features. After eliminating patients with other migraine types, secondary headache, and missing data, 92 patients were included in the study according to their records. Sixty-one children (66.3%) were diagnosed as migraine without aura. Using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the specificity of ICHD-I criteria was detected as 93.5%, while the sensitivity was detected as 36.1%. IHS-R criteria had 90.3% specificity and 78.7% sensitivity. Relief of headache with sleeping or lying down in a dark, quiet room was found to be the highest specific and sensitive factor of the other headache features not included in these criteria. IHS-R criteria were found to be more valid in the diagnosis of migraine without aura than ICHD-I criteria. IHS-R criteria are recommended both in clinical practice and in the studies requiring migraine without aura case definitions in the pediatric population.


Subject(s)
Migraine without Aura/diagnosis , Adolescent , Child , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Migraine without Aura/classification , Recurrence , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Brain Dev ; 24(3): 166-9, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11934513

ABSTRACT

The aims of the study were to compare the clinical types, electroencephalogram (EEG) and cranial magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography findings of epileptic and non-epileptic cerebral palsy (CP) patients. Seventy-four patients with CP were evaluated in 2 years. Tetraplegic CP had a higher incidence of epilepsy (60.5%). EEG was confirmed abnormal in epileptic CP as 90.3%, and in non-epileptic CP as 39.5%. Focal epileptiform activity, generalized slowing, and multifocal epileptiform activity were significantly frequent in epileptic CP. There were cranial imaging abnormalities of 74.2% in epileptic and 48.8% in non-epileptic CP. Although there was not any statistically significant difference between the two groups, epileptic group revealed more structural abnormalities. Further studies concerning a possible risk of epilepsy development and its relations with the EEG and cranial imaging findings are needed in presenting the other risk factors involved and the factors affecting the CP prognosis.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/diagnosis , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Brain/physiopathology , Cerebral Palsy/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...