ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Since 01/2018, AVOS (ambulant vor stationär = outpatient to inpatient) regulation has been progressively implemented in hernia surgery in Switzerland. The aim of this prospective, observational, two-centre comparative study was to compare the outcome of outpatient and inpatient post-operative care in terms of AVOS by examining the re-admission rate, complication rate and quality of life in patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: The study ran between 01/2019 and 04/2020 and included 237 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Treatment setting was decided according to AVOS guidelines. Primary endpoint was re-admission rate within 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the complication rate and patient outcome (quality of life) at 6 weeks follow-up postoperatively, as measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). RESULTS: Complications occurred in 11 (14%) inpatient patients, but none required re-admitting for revision until follow-up at 6 weeks after discharge. In the outpatient group, there were 27 (17%) complications reported, while 6 (4%) of these patients crossed over to the inpatient group immediately after surgery. None of the other complications required re-admission until follow-up at 6 weeks. No significant relationship between treatment setting and number of complications/re-admission rate (p=0.458, p=0.061) was observed. The mean outcome (SF-36) between the treatment groups was not significantly different (p=0.16-0.856). CONCLUSION: In terms of AVOS selection criteria in Switzerland, primary unilateral inguinal hernia can be safely treated in both treatment settings. Re-admission rates, complications and quality of life do not significantly differ. Day surgery in terms of AVOS might be as effective and efficient, both from the patient's perspective and that of the institution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05234242.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Humans , Switzerland , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Inpatients , Outpatients , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Surgical MeshABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a frequently performed bariatric procedure, there is still no consensus on its technical implementation. METHODS: 211 patients treated with LRYGB in a single institution between March 2011 and October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. A subgroup analysis for the linear (LSA) versus circular stapler technique (CSA) for gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) was performed to evaluate complications and outcomes. RESULTS: 128 (60.6%) patients received GJA with CSA and 83 (39.4%) with LSA. Average weight loss one year after surgery, respectively, BMI after one year of follow-up (kg/m2), showed no significant difference. Median surgery time was significantly shorter in the LSA group. If the procedure was performed with CSA, significantly more wound infections occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both the circular and the linear stapler techniques for gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are safe methods with comparable outcomes. A disadvantage of CSA is the significantly higher rate of wound infections, a circumstance which requires increased attention.
ABSTRACT
Technical advances and focusing on subsets modified endocrine surgery in the last ten years tremendously. There is on one side a clear trend towards minimal invasive approaches, first of all in the surgery of the adrenal glands, where the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard for tumors up to a size of 10 cm in diameter. But also in pancreatic endocrine surgery for small tumors localized in the pancreas tail and up to a certain extend in thyroid and parathyroid surgery, laparoscopic or video assisted techniques are used. On the other side more precise techniques allow a more complete and radical removal of endocrine tissue, especially in thyroid surgery. This article presents a summary of current operative techniques and strategies in endocrine surgery.
