Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 60(1): 91-97, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37194785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly prevalent, but diagnosis can still be challenging. Diagnostic delay is particularly deleterious in this age group. OBJECTIVE: This study explores the evolution of diagnostic delay in pediatric IBD and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective study including all pediatric IBD patients diagnosed during 2014, 2019 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital. Diagnostic delay, time to first medical visit, time to pediatric gastroenterologist (PG) visit and time to diagnosis were calculated and compared within a gap of five years (2019 and 2014) and with the year of onset of the pandemic (2020 and 2019). RESULTS: A total of 93 participants were included (2014: 32, 2019: 30, 2020: 31). No significant differences were observed in diagnostic delay, time to first medical visit in Crohn's disease (CD), time to PG visit and time to diagnosis when comparing 2019-2014 and 2020-2019. Time to first visit in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Undetermined-IBD increased in 2019 (P=0.03), with new decrease in 2020 (P=0.04). Diagnostic delay was longer in DC compared to UC plus Undetermined-IBD. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic delay is still an important matter in pediatric IBD, with no significant change over the last years. The time to the first PG visit and the time for diagnosis seem to have the greatest impact on diagnostic delay. Thus, strategies to enhance recognition of IBD symptoms among first-line physicians and to improve communication, facilitating referral, are of utmost importance. Despite the restraints in the health care system caused by the pandemic, time to diagnosis in pediatric IBD was not impaired during 2020 in our center.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Delayed Diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Child , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Portugal , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Adolescent
2.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 60(1): 91-97, Jan.-Mar. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1439392

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly prevalent, but diagnosis can still be challenging. Diagnostic delay is particularly deleterious in this age group. Objective This study explores the evolution of diagnostic delay in pediatric IBD and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Retrospective study including all pediatric IBD patients diagnosed during 2014, 2019 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital. Diagnostic delay, time to first medical visit, time to pediatric gastroenterologist (PG) visit and time to diagnosis were calculated and compared within a gap of five years (2019 and 2014) and with the year of onset of the pandemic (2020 and 2019). Results A total of 93 participants were included (2014: 32, 2019: 30, 2020: 31). No significant differences were observed in diagnostic delay, time to first medical visit in Crohn's disease (CD), time to PG visit and time to diagnosis when comparing 2019-2014 and 2020-2019. Time to first visit in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Undetermined-IBD increased in 2019 (P=0.03), with new decrease in 2020 (P=0.04). Diagnostic delay was longer in DC compared to UC plus Undetermined-IBD. Conclusion Diagnostic delay is still an important matter in pediatric IBD, with no significant change over the last years. The time to the first PG visit and the time for diagnosis seem to have the greatest impact on diagnostic delay. Thus, strategies to enhance recognition of IBD symptoms among first-line physicians and to improve communication, facilitating referral, are of utmost importance. Despite the restraints in the health care system caused by the pandemic, time to diagnosis in pediatric IBD was not impaired during 2020 in our center.


RESUMO Contexto Apesar da prevalência crescente da doença inflamatória intestinal (DII) em idade pediátrica, o seu diagnóstico pode ser desafiante. Um atraso no diagnóstico é particularmente deletério nesta faixa etária. Objetivo Este estudo investiga a evolução do atraso diagnóstico na DII pediátrica e o impacto da pandemia COVID-19 no mesmo. Métodos Estudo retrospetivo que incluiu todos os doentes em idade pediátrica diagnosticados com DII durante 2014, 2019 e 2020 num hospital terciário. O atraso diagnóstico, o tempo para a primeira visita médica, o tempo para a primeira visita ao gastroenterologista pediátrico (GP) e o tempo para o diagnóstico foram calculados e comparados num intervalo de cinco anos (2019 e 2014) e com o ano marcado pelo surgimento da pandemia COVID-19 (2020 e 2019). Resultados Foram incluídos 93 participantes (2014: 32, 2019: 30, 2020: 31). Não se observou diferença significativa no atraso diagnóstico, no tempo para a primeira visita médica na doença de Crohn (DC), no tempo para a primeira visita ao GP e no tempo para o diagnóstico após comparação entre 2019-2014 e 2020-2019. Na colite ulcerosa e colite indeterminada, o tempo para a primeira visita médica aumentou em 2019 (P=0,03), com nova diminuição em 2020 (P=0,04). O atraso diagnóstico foi superior na DC comparativamente com a colite ulcerosa e colite indeterminada. Conclusão O atraso diagnóstico na DII pediátrica continua a ser um tema importante, que não sofreu alteração significativa ao longo dos últimos anos. O tempo para a primeira visita ao GP e o tempo para o diagnóstico parecem ter maior impacto no atraso diagnóstico, pelo que são necessárias estratégias para aumentar o reconhecimento dos sintomas da DII entre os médicos de primeira linha, bem como melhorar a comunicação e a referenciação. Apesar das restrições causadas pela pandemia no sistema de saúde, o tempo para o diagnóstico na DII pediátrica não foi comprometido no nosso centro em 2020.

3.
J Neonatal Perinatal Med ; 15(3): 583-588, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lockdowns imposed by countries due to COVID-19 pandemic had enormous impact on healthcare. Our goal is to determine consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on neonatal hospitalizations and disease incidence in our hospital. METHODS: Observational retrospective study comparing newborns admitted to the neonatal care unit (NCU) from emergency department (ED). Newborns were distributed in two groups according to the date of the lockdown (22/3/2020): pre-lockdown group (12 month before) and post-lockdown group (12 month after). Categorical variables were compared according to chi square test and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney test. A Bonferroni corrected p-value < 0.006 was considered statistically significant. The monthly hospitalization rate between the two groups was analyzed with Generalized Method of Moments - System. RESULTS: We included 99 patients, 65/99 (65.7%) in the pre-lockdown group and 34/99 (34.3%) in the post-lockdown group. Pre-lockdown group: median age at hospitalization 19 (10-26) days, duration of symptoms 12 (5.5-36) hours. Post-lockdown group: median age at hospitalization 16 (6-24) days, duration of symptoms 14 (6-72) hours. The incidence of contagious disease was higher in the pre-lockdown group: 27/65 (41.5%) versus 3/34 (8.8%) in post-lockdown group (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference in gestational age, gender, age at hospitalization, duration of symptoms and length of stay. CONCLUSION: Lockdown decreased admissions in NCU due to the decrease in contagious infections. The similar duration of symptoms before age at hospitalization in the two groups might indicate that health care accessibility has been maintained.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
GE Port J Gastroenterol ; 20: 1-6, 2022 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527801

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Acute COVID-19 in pediatric and young adult patients tends to be milder in severity compared to adult infection. Recent studies seem to show that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at no greater risk than the general population. We aim to describe our experience in the follow-up of pediatric and young adult patients with IBD followed in our center and determine possible risk factors of said population for severe COVID-19. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all patients aged under 25 years followed for IBD at the Unit of Pediatric Gastroenterology in a tertiary center between December 2019 and April 2021 evaluating the incidence of COVID-19 and characterization of positive cases. Results: Of the 268 participants, 24 had COVID-19: the mean age was 19 years old and gender had an equal distribution; 75% (n = 18) had Crohn's disease, whereas only 25% (n = 6) had ulcerative colitis. Most patients were in clinical remission (n = 21). The majority of patients were under treatment with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (58%, n = 14), mainly infliximab, and most had no comorbidities other than IBD (83%). Regarding COVID-19, 17% of the patients were asymptomatic while the rest had only mild symptoms. There were no reported gastrointestinal complaints, no complications nor hospitalizations. Most patients did not require interruption of their IBD treatment. Conclusions: Our data suggest that pediatric and young adult IBD patients have a low risk for complications and hospitalization, regardless of IBD treatment. We believe that this experience is encouraging and allows for safe counseling regarding treatment options and school attendance in pediatric and young adult IBD patients.


Introdução: Na população pediátrica e de jovens adultos a gravidade da COVID-19 tende a ser moderada quando comparada com os doentes adultos. Os estudos mais recentes sugerem que os doentes com doença inflamatória intestinal (DII) não têm risco acrescido em relação à população geral. O objetivo do presente estudo é a descrição da nossa experiência no follow-up de crianças e jovens adultos com DII a COVID-19 e determinar a existência de possíveis fatores de risco para doença grave na referida população. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospetivo de todos os doentes com idade inferior a 25 anos, seguidos na Unidade de Gastrenterologia Pediátrico de um centro terciário por DII, com avaliação da incidência de COVID-19 entre dezembro de 2019 e abril de 2021, e caracterização dos casos postivos. Resultados: Entre os 268 participantes, 24 tiveram COVID-19. A idade média foi de 19 anos com uma distribuição por género equiparável. Destes, 75% (n = 18) tinham doença de Crohn, enquanto 25% (6) tinham colite ulcerosa. A maior parte dos doentes apresentavam-se em remissão clínica (n = 21) e, à data da doença COVID-19. A sua maioria, os doentes encontravam-se sob tratamento com antagonistas do fator de necrose tumoral (58%, n = 14), predominantemente o infliximab, e a generalidade dos doentes (83%) não apresentava outras comorbilidades além da DII. Relativamente à COVID-19, 17% eram assintomáticos enquanto os restantes apresentavam apenas sintomas ligeiros. Não houve relato de queixas gastrointestinais, complicações ou necessidade de hospitalização. Na maioria dos casos, não houve necessidade de interromper o tratamento da DII. Conclusão: Os nossos dados sugerem que doentes pediátricos e jovens adultos com DII apresentam um risco baixo de complicações ou hospitalização associados à COVID-19, independentemente do tratamento em curso para a DII. Este estudo apresenta resultados encorajadores e contribui para o aconselhamento adequado e fundamentado aos doentes e respetivos cuidadores, no que diz respeito às opções terapêuticas e frequência escolar dos doentes pediátricos e jovens adultos com DII.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...