Potential Effects of Remdesivir on Tacrolimus Exposure in Transplant Recipients With COVID-19 Infection.

Introduction: Remdesivir has proven to have benefits against COVID-19 infection. However, data supporting drug-drug interactions are insufficient. Clinicians have noticed that calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels tend to change after starting remdesivir. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of remdesivir on CNI levels. Methods: This study included adult solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 who received remdesivir while on CNI. Patients were excluded if they started on other medications known to interact with CNI. The primary end point was the percentage of change in CNI levels after starting remdesivir. Secondary end points included the time until CNI levels reached a maximum increase in trough levels, the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the time until CNI levels normalized. Results: Of the 86 patients screened, 61 were included (56 on tacrolimus and 5 on cyclosporine). Most patients received kidney transplants (44.3%), and baseline demographics were similar among the transplanted organs. The median increase in tacrolimus level after starting remdesivir was 84.8%, and only 3 patients had no significant change in CNI levels. The median increase in tacrolimus level was more pronounced in lung and kidney recipients than in heart recipients (96.5% vs. 93.9% vs. 64.6 %, respectively). The median time to maximum increase in tacrolimus trough levels was 3 days, and it took 10 days after the remdesivir course for levels to return to baseline. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis demonstrates that CNI levels were significantly elevated after starting remdesivir. However, future studies are warranted to evaluate this interaction further.

A Review of Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants and Their Use in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has increased dramatically since their introduction because of the growing evidence of proven efficacy and enhanced safety compared with warfarin and the low-molecular-weight heparins in the general population. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of quality data regarding the safety and efficacy of the DOACs in patients awaiting organ transplant and those who received a solid organ transplant. This review aims to evaluate the available literature and considerations regarding anticoagulation use in transplant recipients, focusing on preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative DOAC use.

Immunosuppression in the Age of Precision Medicine.

The article focuses on immunosuppression pharmacology, adverse-event profile, clinical efficacy, and, when available, pharmacogenomic data.

Implementing a regional standardized BK polyomavirus screening protocol across eleven transplant centres.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) reactivation is regularly monitored after kidney transplant to prevent progression to BK associated nephropathy (BKAN). The New England BK Consortium, made up of 12 transplant centres in the northeastern United States, conducted a quality improvement project to examine adherence to an agreed upon protocol for BKPyV screening for kidney transplants performed in calendar years 2016-2017. In a total of 1047 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from 11 transplant centres, 204 (19%) had BKPyV infection, defined as detection of BKPyV in plasma, with 41 (4%) KTR progressing to BKAN, defined by either evidence on biopsy tissues or as determined by treating nephrologists. BKPyV infection was treated with reduction of immune suppressants (RIS) in >70% of the patients in all but two centres. There was no graft loss because of BKAN during the two-year follow-up. There were nine cases of post-RIS acute rejection detected during this same period. Adherence to the protocol was low with 54% at 12 months and 38% at 24 months, reflecting challenges of managing transplant patients at all centres. The adherence rate was positively correlated to increased detection of BKPyV infection and was unexpectedly positively correlated to an increase in diagnosis of BKAN.

Mechanisms and management of drug-induced hyperkalemia in kidney transplant patients.

Hyperkalemia is a common and potentially life-threatening complication following kidney transplantation that can be caused by a composite of factors such as medications, delayed graft function, and possibly potassium intake. Managing hyperkalemia after kidney transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and healthcare costs, and can be a cause of multiple hospital admissions and barriers to patient discharge. Medications used routinely after kidney transplantation are considered the most frequent culprit for post-transplant hyperkalemia in recipients with a well-functioning graft. These include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylactic agents, and antihypertensives (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers). CNIs can cause hyperkalemic renal tubular acidosis. When hyperkalemia develops following transplantation, the potential offending medication may be discontinued, switched to another agent, or dose-reduced. Belatacept and mTOR inhibitors offer an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors in the event of hyperkalemia, however should be prescribed in the appropriate patient. While trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) remains the gold standard for prevention of PCP, alternative agents (e.g. dapsone, atovaquone) have been studied and can be recommend in place of TMP/SMX. Antihypertensives that act on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System are generally avoided early after transplant but may be indicated later in the transplant course for patients with comorbidities. In cases of mild to moderate hyperkalemia, medical management can be used to normalize serum potassium levels and allow the transplant team additional time to evaluate the function of the graft. In the immediate post-operative setting following kidney transplantation, a rapidly rising potassium refractory to medical therapy can be an indication for dialysis. Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9) may play an important role in the management of chronic hyperkalemia in kidney transplant patients, although additional long-term studies are necessary to confirm these effects.

Novel approaches to management of hyperkalaemia in kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medications used frequently after kidney transplantation, including calcineurin inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers and antimicrobials, are considered the leading culprit for posttransplant hyperkalaemia in recipients with a well functioning allograft. Other risk factors include comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension and heart failure; and consumption of a potassium-enriched diet. We review the mechanisms for hyperkalaemia following kidney transplantation that are addressed using nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions. We also discuss emerging therapeutic approaches for the management of recurrent hyperkalaemia in solid organ transplantation, including newer potassium binding therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate are emerging potassium binders approved for the treatment of hyperkalaemia. Patiromer is a polymer that exchanges potassium for calcium ions. In contrast, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate is a nonpolymer compound that exchanges potassium for sodium and hydrogen ions. Both agents are efficacious in the treatment of chronic or recurrent hyperkalaemia and may result in fewer gastrointestinal side effects than older potassium binders such as sodium polystyrene sulfonate and calcium polystyrene sulfonate. Large-scale clinical studies have not been performed in kidney transplant patients. Patiromer may increase serum concentrations of tacrolimus, but not cyclosporine. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate does not appear to compromise tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, although it may have a higher sodium burden. SUMMARY: Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate may be well tolerated options to treat asymptomatic hyperkalaemia and have the potential to ease potassium dietary restrictions in kidney transplant patients by maintaining a plant-dominant, heart-healthy diet. Their efficacy, better tolerability and comparable cost with respect to previously available potassium binders make them an attractive therapeutic option in chronic hyperkalaemia following kidney transplantation.

New England BK consortium: Regional survey of BK screening and management protocols in comparison to published consensus guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) continues to impact renal transplant recipients (RTR). The New England BK Consortium aims to jointly optimize screening and management of BKPyV. METHODS: Our first project was to survey centers' BKPyV screening protocols and compare them to consensus guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen of 15 centers (86.7%) returned the survey. Only two center reported using monitoring parameters that were in line with consensus guidelines for BKPyV screening, while the majority of centers reported less intensive methods and shorter duration. One center reported performing renal biopsies in all patients with plasma viral loads >10 000 copies/mL, while all other centers only perform for-cause biopsies. For presumptive nephropathy, 11 centers recommend a biopsy for confirmation. For management of documented BKPyV-associated nephropathy, 12 centers propose further immunosuppression reduction. Nine centers report CNI dose reduction as their primary treatment. More than half of centers surveyed reported use of leflunomide, cidofovir or intravenous immunoglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: There was a large variance in BKPyV screening and management strategies among centers. Due to these results, all participating centers agreed to implement uniform screening and aim to optimize management protocols.

Post-Renal Transplantation Outcomes in Elderly Patients Compared to Younger Patients in the Setting of Early Steroid Withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported improved outcomes for renal recipients undergoing early steroid withdrawal (ESW), with significantly lower rates of new-onset diabetes, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and malignancy. As renal transplants in older adults has increased, studies have shown similar outcomes between elderly and younger patients. We aim to evaluate post-renal transplantation outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients who have undergone ESW. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adults who received transplants between January 2004 and December 2014 and received either basiliximab or antithymocyte globulin for induction, underwent ESW, and received tacrolimus and mycophenolate for maintenance. Patients were stratified based on age (≥60 vs <60). The 1-year primary end point was a composite of patient survival, graft survival, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and serum creatinine. The secondary outcomes included renal function, the incidence of opportunistic infections, malignancies, diabetes, and cardiovascular complications. Cox regression was used to evaluate variables that may affect rejection. RESULTS: The sample included 292 patients; 72 were elderly individuals and 220 were younger adults. No significant differences were found in the primary end point or incidence of CMV, BK virus, or malignancy ( P = 1.0, .82, and .06, respectively). The use of blood pressure medications and the need for lipid-lowering agents were significantly higher in elderly patients at last follow-up. Diabetes was more common in elderly patients (15.2% vs 8.41%, P = .11). The induction agent used did not show any significant effect on rejection risk. CONCLUSION: We report similar outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients in the setting of ESW.

Early aspirin use and the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Little is known about the influence of aspirin on clinical expression of CAV. METHODS: We followed 120 patients with OHT at a single center for a median of 7 years and categorized them by the presence or absence of early aspirin therapy post-transplant (aspirin treatment ≥6 months in the first year). The association between aspirin use and time to the primary end-point of angiographic moderate or severe CAV (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2) was investigated. Propensity scores for aspirin treatment were estimated using boosting models and applied by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Despite a preponderance of risk factors for CAV among patients receiving aspirin (male sex, ischemic heart disease as the etiology of heart failure, and smoking), aspirin therapy was associated with a lower rate of moderate or severe CAV at 5 years. Event-free survival was 95.9% for patients exposed to aspirin compared with 79.6% for patients without aspirin exposure (log-rank p = 0.005). IPTW-weighted Cox regression revealed a powerful inverse association between aspirin use and moderate to severe CAV (adjusted hazard ratio 0.13; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.59), which was directionally consistent for CAV of any severity (adjusted hazard ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: This propensity score-based comparative observational analysis suggests that early aspirin exposure may be associated with a reduced risk of development of moderate to severe CAV. These findings warrant prospective validation in controlled investigations.

CMV and BKPyV Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving an mTOR Inhibitor-Based Regimen Versus a CNI-Based Regimen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the incidences of cytomegalovirus and BK polyoma virus infections in renal transplant recipients receiving a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR)-based regimen compared with a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a comprehensive search for randomized, controlled trials up to January of 2016 addressing our objective. Other outcomes included acute rejection, graft loss, serious adverse events, proteinuria, wound-healing complications, and eGFR. Two review authors selected eligible studies, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We assessed quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS: We included 28 randomized, controlled trials with 6211 participants classified into comparison 1: mTOR inhibitor versus calcineurin inhibitor and comparison 2: mTOR inhibitor plus reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitor versus regular dose of calcineurin inhibitor. Results showed decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in mTOR inhibitor-based group in both comparison 1 (risk ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.72), with high quality of evidence, and comparison 2 (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.80), with moderate quality of evidence. The available evidence neither confirmed nor ruled out a reduction of BK polyoma virus infection in mTOR inhibitor-based group in both comparisons. Secondary outcomes revealed more serious adverse events and acute rejections in mTOR inhibitor-based group in comparison 1 and no difference in comparison 2. There was no difference in graft loss in both comparisons. eGFR was higher in the mTOR inhibitor-based group in comparison 1 (mean difference =4.07 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 6.80) and similar to the calcineurin inhibitor-based group in comparison 2. More proteinuria and wound-healing complications occurred in the mTOR inhibitor-based groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate- to high-quality evidence of reduced risk of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients in the mTOR inhibitor-based compared with the calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen. Our review also suggested that a combination of a mTOR inhibitor and a reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitor may be associated with similar eGFR and rates of acute rejections and serious adverse events compared with a standard calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen at the expense of higher incidence of proteinuria and wound-healing complications.

Use of polyclonal/monoclonal antibody therapies in transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: For over thirty years, antibody (mAb)-based therapies have been a standard component of transplant immunosuppression, and yet much remains to be learned in order for us to truly harness their therapeutic capabilities. Current mAbs used in transplant directly target and destroy graft-destructive immune cells, interrupt cytokine and costimulation-dependent T and B cell activation, and prevent down-stream complement activation. Areas covered: This review summarizes our current approaches to using antibody-based therapies to prevent and treat allograft rejection. It also provides examples of promising novel mAb therapies, and discusses the potential for future mAb development in transplantation. Expert opinion: The broad capability of antibodies, in parallel with our growing ability to synthetically modulate them, offers exciting opportunities to develop better biologic therapeutics. In order to do so, we must further our understanding about the basic biology underlying allograft rejection, and gain better appreciation of how characteristics of therapeutic antibodies affect their efficacy.

Is There Evidence to Support Brand to Generic Interchange of the Mycophenolic Acid Products?

The uptake of generic immunosuppressants lags comparatively to other drug classes, despite that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses identical bioequivalence standards for all drugs. Transplant societies acknowledge the cost savings associated with generic immunosuppressants and support their use following heart, lung, kidney, or bone marrow transplantation. Seven studies of the pharmacokinetics or clinical efficacy of generic mycophenolate mofetil compared to the innovator product are published; all studies and products were ex-United States. Three studies did not demonstrate any pharmacokinetic differences between generic and innovator products in healthy subjects, achieving FDA bioequivalence requirements. Two studies in renal allograft recipients demonstrated no difference in area under the curves between generic and innovator products, and in one, the maximum concentration (Cmax) fell outside the FDA regulatory range. Two studies revealed no difference in acute organ rejection or graft function in renal allograft recipients. Patient surveys indicate that cost is a barrier to immunosuppressant adherence. Generics present a viable method to reduce costs to payers, patients, and health care systems. Adherence to immunosuppressants is crucial to prevent graft failure. An affordable regimen potentially confers greater adherence. Concerns regarding the presumed inferiority of generic immunosuppressants should be assuaged by regulatory requirements for bioequivalency testing, transplant society position statements, and pharmacokinetic and clinical studies.

Micafungin treatment and eradication of candiduria among hospitalized patients.

PURPOSE: In high-risk patients, candiduria may be associated with the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) and invasive candidiasis. The triazole antifungals achieve good urine concentrations, but their use is limited by the emergence of non-albicans Candida spp. with low-triazole susceptibility. The echinocandins remain fungicidal against many azole-resistant Candida spp., but low urine concentrations limit their use. We examined the rates of candiduria elimination in micafungin-treated patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis evaluated consecutive patients with candiduria (1/2008-4/2011) who were treated with micafungin (100 mg/day) and had post-micafungin urine cultures. Patients were deemed to have either candiduria or UTI and were assessed for short-term (within 2 weeks post-micafungin) and long-term (>1 month post-micafungin) urine sterilization. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients meeting our inclusion criteria were identified. Of these, 16 (48 %) were diagnosed with a Candida UTI. A total of 25 patients (76 %) had Foley catheters, which were replaced in 11 (44 %) cases. The majority of patients had Candida albicans (39 %), but Candida krusei and Candida glabrata (33 %) were also isolated. Eight patients (24 %) were immunocompromised, and 29 (88 %) received broad-spectrum antibiotics. Rates of urine sterilization during micafungin treatment, 2 weeks after micafungin, and >1 month after micafungin were 81, 78, and 75 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized patients with candiduria, micafungin administration was frequently associated with both short- and long-term urine sterilization. This was observed among patients with or without Foley removal and among those with Candida albicans, as well as non-albicans Candida spp.

Multicenter evaluation of efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in donor and recipient positive (D+/R+) renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor-positive/recipient-positive (D+/R+) population is the largest proportion of renal transplant recipients (RTR). Guidelines for prevention of CMV in the intermediate-risk D+/R+ population include prophylaxis with valganciclovir (VGCV) 900 mg/day for 3 months. This study is the first head-to-head analysis, to our knowledge, comparing the efficacy and safety CMV prophylaxis of VGCV 450 vs 900 mg/day for 3 months in D+/R+ RTR. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis evaluated 478 adult RTR between January 2008 and October 2011. Study participants received VGCV 450 mg/day (Group 1; n=398) or 900 mg/day (Group 2; n=89)×3 months for CMV prophylaxis. All VGCV was adjusted for renal function. All groups included in this study received study-approved induction and maintenance immunosuppression regimens. The primary endpoint was incidence of CMV disease at 12 months. RESULTS: The rates of graft loss, patient survival, T-cell and/or antibody-mediated rejection, hematological adverse events, opportunistic infections, and early VGCV discontinuation were evaluated. Patient demographics were comparable, but had significant differences in ethnicity and donor type between the groups. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of CMV disease at 12 months was similar between the groups (3.5% vs 3.4%; P=1.000). Log-rank test found no statistically significant difference in the time to development of CMV between the 2 groups (P=.939).

Nephrotoxicity of Natural Products.

BACKGROUND: The manufacture and sale of natural products constitute a multi-billion dollar industry. Nearly a third of the American population admit to using some form of complementary or alternative medicine, with many using them in addition to prescription medications. Most patients fail to inform their healthcare providers of their natural product use and physicians rarely inquire. Annually, thousands of natural product-induced adverse events are reported to Poison Control Centers nationwide. Natural product manufacturers are not responsible for proving safety and efficacy, as the FDA does not regulate them. However, concerns exist surrounding the safety of natural products. SUMMARY: This review provides details on natural products that have been associated with renal dysfunction. We have focused on products that have been associated with direct renal injury, immune-mediated nephrotoxicity, nephrolithiasis, rhabdomyolysis with acute renal injury, hepatorenal syndrome, and common adulterants or contaminants that are associated with renal dysfunction. KEY MESSAGES: The potential for natural products to cause renal dysfunction is justifiable. It is imperative that natural product use be monitored closely in all patients. Healthcare practitioners must play an active role in identifying patients using natural products and provide appropriate patient education.