Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
mBio ; 5(4): e01534-14, 2014 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25073644

ABSTRACT

We sought a new approach to treating infections by intracellular bacteria, namely, by altering host cell functions that support their growth. We screened a library of 640 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved compounds for agents that render THP-1 cells resistant to infection by four intracellular pathogens. We identified numerous drugs that are not antibiotics but were highly effective in inhibiting intracellular bacterial growth with limited toxicity to host cells. These compounds are likely to target three kinds of host functions: (i) G protein-coupled receptors, (ii) intracellular calcium signals, and (iii) membrane cholesterol distribution. The compounds that targeted G protein receptor signaling and calcium fluxes broadly inhibited Coxiella burnetii, Legionella pneumophila, Brucella abortus, and Rickettsia conorii, while those directed against cholesterol traffic strongly attenuated the intracellular growth of C. burnetii and L. pneumophila. These pathways probably support intracellular pathogen growth so that drugs that perturb them may be therapeutic candidates. Combining host- and pathogen-directed treatments is a strategy to decrease the emergence of drug-resistant intracellular bacterial pathogens. Importance: Although antibiotic treatment is often successful, it is becoming clear that alternatives to conventional pathogen-directed therapy must be developed in the face of increasing antibiotic resistance. Moreover, the costs and timing associated with the development of novel antimicrobials make repurposed FDA-approved drugs attractive host-targeted therapeutics. This paper describes a novel approach of identifying such host-targeted therapeutics against intracellular bacterial pathogens. We identified several FDA-approved drugs that inhibit the growth of intracellular bacteria, thereby implicating host intracellular pathways presumably utilized by bacteria during infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Brucella abortus/drug effects , Coxiella burnetii/drug effects , Legionella pneumophila/drug effects , Rickettsia conorii/drug effects , Brucella abortus/pathogenicity , Cell Line , Coxiella burnetii/pathogenicity , Humans , Legionella pneumophila/pathogenicity , Rickettsia conorii/pathogenicity
2.
PLoS Pathog ; 5(7): e1000501, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19578436

ABSTRACT

Delivery of effector proteins is a process widely used by bacterial pathogens to subvert host cell functions and cause disease. Effector delivery is achieved by elaborate injection devices and can often be triggered by environmental stimuli. However, effector export by the L. pneumophila Icm/Dot Type IVB secretion system cannot be detected until the bacterium encounters a target host cell. We used chemical genetics, a perturbation strategy that utilizes small molecule inhibitors, to determine the mechanisms critical for L. pneumophila Icm/Dot activity. From a collection of more than 2,500 annotated molecules we identified specific inhibitors of effector translocation. We found that L. pneumophila effector translocation in macrophages requires host cell factors known to be involved in phagocytosis such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases, actin and tubulin. Moreover, we found that L. pneumophila phagocytosis and effector translocation also specifically require the receptor protein tyrosine phosphate phosphatases CD45 and CD148. We further show that phagocytosis is required to trigger effector delivery unless intimate contact between the bacteria and the host is artificially generated. In addition, real-time analysis of effector translocation suggests that effector export is rate-limited by phagocytosis. We propose a model in which L. pneumophila utilizes phagocytosis to initiate an intimate contact event required for the translocation of pre-synthesized effector molecules. We discuss the need for host cell participation in the initial step of the infection and its implications in the L. pneumophila lifestyle. Chemical genetic screening provides a novel approach to probe the host cell functions and factors involved in host-pathogen interactions.


Subject(s)
Legionella pneumophila/physiology , Legionnaires' Disease/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Carbonyl Cyanide m-Chlorophenyl Hydrazone/pharmacology , Carbonyl Cyanide p-Trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone/pharmacology , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line , Cytoskeleton/physiology , Genes, Reporter , Host-Pathogen Interactions/physiology , Humans , Ionophores/pharmacology , Legionella pneumophila/genetics , Legionnaires' Disease/genetics , Leukocyte Common Antigens/genetics , Leukocyte Common Antigens/metabolism , Macrophages/metabolism , Macrophages/microbiology , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Opsonin Proteins , Phagocytosis/physiology , Protein Transport , Receptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 3/metabolism , Small Molecule Libraries , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
3.
J Biol Chem ; 277(30): 27477-88, 2002 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11994286

ABSTRACT

Azurocidin/CAP37/HBP is an antimicrobial and chemotactic protein that is part of the innate defenses of human neutrophils. In addition, azurocidin is an inactive serine protease homolog with binding sites for diverse ligands including heparin and the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). The structure of the protein reveals a highly cationic domain concentrated on one side of the molecule and responsible for its strong polarity. To investigate the role of this highly basic region, we produced three recombinant azurocidin mutant proteins that were altered in either one or both of two clusters of 4 basic residues located symmetrically on each side of a central cleft in the cationic domain. Two of the mutant proteins (Loop 3: R5Q, K6Q, R8Q, and R10Q; Loop 4: R61Q, R62Q, R63Q, and R65Q) exhibited little or no change in heparin and BPTI binding or in antimicrobial function. In contrast, the Loop 3/Loop 4 mutant (R5Q, K6Q, R8Q, R10Q, R61Q, R62Q, R63Q, and R65Q) in which all 8 basic residues were replaced showed greatly decreased ability to bind heparin and to kill Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. Thus, we report that the 8 basic residues that were altered in the Loop 3/Loop 4 mutant contribute to the ability of the wild-type azurocidin molecule to bind heparin and to kill E. coli and C. albicans. Because BPTI binding was comparable in wild-type and Loop 3/Loop 4 mutant protein, we conclude that the same 8 basic residues are not involved in the binding of BPTI to azurocidin, supporting the notion that the binding site for BPTI is distinct from the site involved in heparin binding and antimicrobial activity. Finally, we show that removal of all 4 positively charged amino acids in the 20-44 azurocidin sequence (DMC1: R23Q,H24S,H32S,R34Q), a region previously thought to contain an antimicrobial domain, does not affect the activity of the protein against E. coli, Streptococcus faecalis, and C. albicans.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Blood Proteins/chemistry , Carrier Proteins/chemistry , Heparin/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides , Blood Proteins/metabolism , Candida albicans/metabolism , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Circular Dichroism , DNA/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Heparin/pharmacology , Ligands , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutation , Neutrophils/metabolism , Protein Binding , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...