ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The role of paramedics in hospital triage or streaming models has not been adequately explored and is potentially a missed opportunity for enhanced patient flow. The aim of the present study was to assess the concordance between a streaming decision by paramedics with the decision by nurses after arrival to the ED. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted. Paramedics were met at the entrance to the hospital and asked which destination they thought was appropriate (the index test). The ED nurse streaming decision was the reference standard. Cases of discordance were reviewed and assessed for clinical risk by an independent expert panel that was blinded. RESULTS: We collected data from 500 cases that were transported by ambulance consisting of 55% males with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range 38-75). The overall concordance between paramedics' and streaming decision was 86.4% (95% confidence interval 83.1-89.1). The concordance was highest among patients streamed to resuscitation and general cubicles. Among discordant cases (n = 68), 39 were streamed to a more acute destination than the paramedic suggested. Of the 68 discordant cases, 56 were deemed to be of no clinical risk. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited knowledge of patient load within the ED, paramedics can allocate a streaming destination with high accuracy and this appears to be associated with low clinical risks. Early pre-hospital notification of streaming destination with proactive allocation of ED destination presents a real opportunity to minimise off-load times and improve patient flow.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Medical Technicians , Allied Health Personnel , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , TriageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of methoxyflurane versus standard care for the initial management of severe pain among adult emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: This randomized parallel-group open-label phase IV trial of methoxyflurane was conducted in a tertiary hospital ED setting in Australia. Inclusion criteria required adult patients to have an initial pain score ≥ 8 on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment at ED triage. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving clinically substantial pain reduction, defined as a ≥50% drop in the pain score at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included the pain score at multiple time points (15, 30, 60, 90 minutes) and the difference in the proportion of patients achieving a >2-point reduction on the NRS. RESULTS: There were 120 patients randomized and analyzed between September 4, 2019, and January 16, 2020. The primary outcome was achieved in six (10%) patients in the methoxyflurane arm and three (5%) in the standard care arm (p = 0.49). A higher proportion of patients in the methoxyflurane arm reported a >2-point drop on the NRS at all time points (17% vs. 5% at 15 minutes, 25% vs. 9% at 30 minutes, 30% vs. 10% at 60 minutes, and 33% vs. 13% at 90 minutes). Methoxyflurane use was also associated with lower median pain scores at all time points. CONCLUSION: Initial management with inhaled methoxyflurane in the ED did not achieve the prespecified substantial reduction in pain, but was associated with clinically significant lower pain scores compared to standard therapy.
