Dried blood spots and sparse sampling: a practical approach to estimating pharmacokinetic parameters of caffeine in preterm infants.

AIMS: Dried blood spots (DBS) alongside micro-analytical techniques are a potential solution to the challenges of performing pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in children. However, DBS methods have received little formal evaluation in clinical settings relevant to children. The aim of the present study was to determine a PK model for caffeine using a 'DBS/microvolume platform' in preterm infants. METHODS: DBS samples were collected prospectively from premature babies receiving caffeine for treatment of apnoea of prematurity. A non-linear mixed effects approach was used to develop a population PK model from measured DBS caffeine concentrations. Caffeine PK parameter estimates based on DBS data were then compared with plasma estimates for agreement. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-eight DBS cards for caffeine measurement were collected from 67 preterm infants (birth weight 0.6-2.11 kg). 88% of cards obtained were of acceptable quality and no child had more than 10 DBS samples or more than 0.5 ml of blood taken over the study period. There was good agreement between PK parameters estimated using caffeine concentrations from DBS samples (CL = 7.3 ml h⁻¹ kg⁻¹; V = 593 ml kg⁻¹; t(½) = 57 h) and historical caffeine PK parameter estimates based on plasma samples (CL = 4.9-7.9 ml h⁻¹ kg⁻¹; V = 640-970 ml kg⁻¹; t(½) = 101-144 h). We also found that changes in blood haematocrit may significantly confound estimates of caffeine PK parameters based on DBS data. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that DBS methods can be applied to PK studies in a vulnerable population group and are a practical alternative to wet matrix sampling techniques.

Determination of drug concentrations using dried blood spots: investigation of blood sampling and collection techniques in Crl:CD(SD) rats.

Dried bloodspot (DBS) technology has been available for many decades but only in the last five years has it been considered for routine bioanalysis of blood samples collected on preclinical and clinical studies as part of a drug development programme. Advantages of using DBS versus typical plasma samples include smaller blood volumes, less processing of the samples (e.g. no centrifugation) and no requirement for storing or shipping of the samples at frozen temperatures. The current study compared blood concentrations (AUC(0-t) and C(max)) from rats given an oral dose of acetaminophen (APAP) using two different sampling sites (caudal venepuncture versus tail snip), two different collection methods (3 separate 15 µL ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]-coated capillary tubes versus an EDTA integrated capillary blood collection system) and variability between blood spots on one card. There were no noteworthy differences (i.e. two-fold or greater) in blood concentrations of APAP using the different sites or methods. Furthermore, comparisons of the APAP blood concentrations in the original spot to a duplicate bloodspot from the same bloodspot card were within 12% of the original concentration.