ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treadmill testing is usually preferred over cycle ergometry because of the greater sensitivity in diagnosing coronary artery disease. Treadmill testing has only recently been used with radionuclide angiography (RNA) because patient motion makes RNA imaging difficult. In this study we evaluate the comparability of treadmill and cycle exercise RNA with a dual isotope motion correction technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: Volunteer patients (n = 27) performed first-pass RNA during maximal exercise using both cycle ergometer and treadmill. Exercise capacity was greater during treadmill exercise (8.1 +/- 2.4 vs 7.5 +/- 2.2 METs). Twenty-three of 27 treadmill and all cycle ergometer exercise studies were technically adequate. Maximal heart rate was greater during treadmill exercise (150 +/- 24 vs 143 +/- 25 beats * min-l), however, systolic blood pressure was greater during cycle ergometry (174 +/- 23 vs 188 +/- 25 mmHg), resulting in no difference in heart rate times systolic blood pressure (25.7 +/- 7.2 vs 26.9 +/- 6.0). There were no differences between treadmill and cycle ergometer for peak exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (56% +/- 13% vs 57% +/- 14%) (r = 0.89). Calculated left ventricular end-diastolic volume was not different at rest (183 +/- 42 ml vs 176 +/- 44 ml) but differed significantly at peak exercise (282 +/- 75 ml vs 231 +/- 60 ml). The clinical impression, based on wall motion and left ventricular ejection fraction was very similar between treadmill and cycle ergometer. CONCLUSION: Treadmill exercise RNA is feasible, with about 85% of studies likely to be technically adequate. The overall clinical results are very similar to cycle exercise RNA, although the ordinarily expected advantages of treadmill exercise were largely absent.
