Corrigendum to: 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases.

Corrigendum to: 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases [Eur Heart Journal (2014) 35, 2873­2926,doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281]. In Table 3, the radiation for MRI is "0" and not "-". The corrected table is shown below.

Lowering heart rate with an optimised breathing protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered CT coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to prospectively characterise the effect of the level of breath-hold on heart rate in CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering and its impact on coronary artery attenuation. METHODS: 260 patients (86 women; mean age 59 ± 11 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. Prior to CTCA, heart rates were recorded during 15 s of breath-hold at three different levels of inspiration (normal, intermediate and deep). The inspiration level with the lowest heart rate was chosen for actual CTCA scanning. Coronary artery attenuation was measured, and the presence of backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (as an indicator of increased intrathoracic pressure) was recorded. RESULTS: The mean heart rate at breath-hold was significantly different for the three inspiration levels (normal, 60 ± 8 bpm; intermediate, 59 ± 8 bpm; deep, 57 ± 7 bpm; p<0.001). The maximum heart rate reduction in each patient at breath-hold averaged 5.3 ± 5.1 bpm, and was observed at a normal inspiration depth in 23 (9%) patients, at an intermediate inspiration depth in 102 (39%) patients and at deep inspiration in 135 (52%) patients. Overall, there was no association between the level of breath-hold and coronary vessel attenuation (p-value was not significant). However, the backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (n = 26) was found predominantly at deep inspiration levels (p<0.001), and, when it occurred, it was associated with reduced coronary attenuation compared with patients with no backflow (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The breath-hold level to best reduce heart rate for CTCA should be individually assessed prior to scanning because a mean heart rate reduction of 5 bpm can be achieved.

First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Reduction of radiation burden of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has remained an important task. OBJECTIVE: To compare effective radiation dose of low-dose 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-triggering versus diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (CA). METHODS: 42 patients referred for elective invasive CA owing to suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled to undergo a low-dose CTCA without calcium scoring within the same day before CA. Dose-area product of diagnostic invasive CA and dose-length product of CTCA were measured, converted into effective radiation dose and compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. In addition, accuracy of CTCA to detect CAD (coronary artery narrowing > or =50%) was assessed using invasive CA as standard of reference. On an intention-to-diagnose basis all non-evaluative vessels were included in the analysis and censored as positive. RESULTS: The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 8.5 (4.4) mSv (range 1.4-20.5 mSv) for diagnostic invasive CA, and 2.1 (0.7) mSv (range 1.0-3.3 mSv) for CTCA (p<0.001). 19 patients (42.9%) had no CAD by invasive CA. 40 (95.2%) patients have been correctly classified as having CAD (23/23) or no CAD (17/19). Over 97% (551/567) of segments were evaluable. Vessel-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 94.2% (CI 0.8% to 1.0%), 94.8% (CI 09% to 1.0%), 89.0% (CI 0.8% to 1.0%), 97.4% (CI 09% to 1.0%) and an accuracy of 94.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose CTCA allows evaluation of CAD with high accuracy, but delivers a significantly less effective radiation dose to patients compared to diagnostic invasive CA.

Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCTA) may be useful for risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) at intermediate pretest likelihood according to Diamond and Forrester. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: MSCTA images were evaluated for the presence of significant CAD in 316 patients with suspected CAD (60% male, average (SD) age 57 (11) years) and an intermediate pretest likelihood according to Diamond and Forrester. Patients were followed up to determine the occurrence of an event. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A combined end point of all-cause mortality, non-fatal infarction and unstable angina requiring revascularisation. RESULTS: Significant CAD was seen in 89 patients (28%), whereas normal MSCTA or non-significant CAD was seen in the remaining 227 (72%) patients. During follow-up (median 621 days (25-75th centile 408-835) an event occurred in 13 patients (4.8%). The annualised event rate was 0.8% in patients with normal MSCT, 2.2% in patients with non-significant CAD and 6.5% in patients with significant CAD. Moreover, MSCTA remained a significant predictor (p<0.05) of events after multivariate correction (hazard ratio = 3.460 (95% CI 1.142 to 10.480). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood, MSCTA is highly effective in re-stratifying patients into either a low or high post-test risk group. These results further emphasise the usefulness of non-invasive imaging with MSCTA in this patient population.

Impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative coronary angiography with 64-slice CT.

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). CTCA and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were performed in 100 consecutive patients (42 women, 58 men; mean age 64.4+/-9.4 years; age range 39-87 years). In QCA, stenoses were quantified with dedicated software, whereas in CTCA, stenosis severity was assessed with an electronic caliper tool: stenoses were graded in 10% steps and assigned as either a calcified or non-calcified lesion. Vessel attenuation in the left main (LMA) and the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) were measured and correlated with differences in quantifications of stenosis grade between QCA and CTCA. A total of 113 coronary stenoses were detected by both methods (94 significant and 19 non-significant); 52 stenoses were rated as non-calcified and 61 as calcified lesions. The mean difference between QCA and quantitative CTCA grading was 5.1+/-16.9% (range -27 to 46%) overall; 1.9+/-14.2% (range -27 to 38%) for non-calcified lesions and 7.8+/-18.6% (range -23 to 46%) for calcified lesions. Mean vessel attenuation was 362+/-76 HU (range 191-584 HU) in the LMA and 333+/-81 HU (range 162-564 HU) in the RCA. Attenuation did not significantly correlate with differences in QCA and CTCA gradings, neither overall nor for calcified or non-calcified lesions. When 64-slice CTCA is used, coronary vessel attenuation had no impact on the quantitative grading of stenoses.

Combining dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), calcium scoring (CS) and both methods combined for assessing significant coronary artery stenoses relative to conventional coronary angiography (CCA). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 74 consecutive patients (24 women; mean age 62 (SD 12) years) from August-October 2006. All study participants underwent CS, CTCA and CCA. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for CS, CTCA and both methods combined relative to CCA. Not-evaluative segments at computed tomography were considered false positive. RESULTS: CCA identified 139 stenoses in 36 patients. Average heart rate during CTCA was 68 (13) bpm (range 35-102 bpm), and 2% of segments (21/1001) in 11% of patients (8/74) were not evaluative. Considering these as false positives, per-patient sensitivity and specificity was 98% and 87%. When using CS cut-off values of 0 to exclude and >or=400 to predict stenosis, sensitivity and specificity of CS was 100% and 70%, respectively. Combining CS and CTCA in all patients correctly reclassified five patients, while six were falsely classified as stenotic, all of them correctly classified with CTCA alone. Using CS only in patients with not-evaluative segments correctly reclassified five patients while avoiding misclassifications (sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%). CONCLUSION: Dual-source CTCA allows the diagnosis of significant stenoses with a high diagnostic accuracy. Selectively combining CS with CTCA in patients with not-evaluative coronary segments improves specificity from 87% to 100% without decreasing the high sensitivity of 98%.

[Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography]. / Einfluss des Bodymass-Index auf den Kontrast in den Koronararterien mit der 64-Schicht-CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients retrospectively underwent ECG-gated 64-slice CT coronary angiography (tube potential 120 kV, tube current time product 650 mAs) after intravenous injection of 80 ml of iodinated contrast agent (320 mg/ml, 5 ml/s). Attenuation values (HU) were measured and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left main artery (LMA). The CNR was defined as the difference between the mean attenuation in the vessel and the mean attenuation in the perivascular fat tissue divided by the image noise in the ascending aorta. The height and weight of the patients at the time of the CT scan were recorded and the BMI was calculated. RESULTS: The mean BMI was 26.2 +/- 3.2 kg/m (2) (range 19.7 - 32.2 kg/m (2)), the mean attenuation in the LMA was 330 +/- 64 HU, and the mean attenuation in the RCA was 309 +/- 68 HU. The CNR in the LMA was 16.7 +/- 3.8, and the CNR in the RCA was 15.9 +/- 3.6. The image noise in the ascending aorta significantly correlated with the BMI (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). A weak negative correlation was found between the BMI and LMA attenuation (r = - 0.28, p < 0.05), whereas no significant correlation was found for the RCA (r = - 0.21, p = 0.12). A significant negative correlation was found between the BMI and the CNR in the RCA (r = - 0.41, p < 0.05) and the LMA (r = - 0.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With constant scan parameters and a constant contrast medium amount, the CNR in both coronary arteries decreases while the BMI increases. This implies a modification of previously standardized and fixed examinations with respect to individually adapted protocols with variable parameters for CT coronary angiography.