ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are numerous clinical scenarios during which the surgeon contemplates whether the radial or ulnar slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) should be sacrificed. To date no study has assessed the point of failure of each one of the FDS slips in each digit, aiding the avid surgeon in deciding which slip to sacrifice. METHODS: A total of 41 digits were assessed, each digit was dissected, and a specimen containing the denuded bone of the middle phalanx with the attachments of the ulnar and radial FDS slips was obtained. An Instron 4502 device was utilized to biomechanically assess the point of failure of each slip of each digit. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between ulnar and radial slip point of failure when compared across all digits and subjects. There was no statistical difference between male and female subject's specimens. The point of failure was higher in the ulnar slips of the second and third digits, whereas the point of failure was higher in the radial slips of the fourth and fifth digits. CONCLUSIONS: Sacrifice of a FDS slip may cause loss of grip strength. In several clinical scenarios one may be faced with the dilemma which FDS slip to sacrifice. Our findings show this is not an arbitrary choice. Hand surgeons should keep our findings in mind when deciding which slip to sacrifice, in effort to preserve function and strength in the injured hand.
Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal , Tendon Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Pilot Projects , Fingers/surgery , Tendon Injuries/surgery , HandABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains controversial. Although commonly recommended for less comminuted PHFs, the outcomes of treatment with proximal humerus nailing (PHN) are more equivocal. The purpose of this study was to report on radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PHN fixation of 3- and 4-part PHFs at minimum one-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that the findings would demonstrate satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes, with low rates of complications and revision surgeries. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 121 patients with comminuted, low-energy, osteoporotic, PHFs underwent fixation via Targon PHN (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Of these, 60 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (mean age 72; range 65-85). All completed a minimum 1-year follow-up (range 12.5-82 months). Patients with 3-part PHFs were compared to patients with 4-part PHFs. Clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes were assessed at postoperative visits. Patient reported outcomes included pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Radiographic union and revision and complication rates were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 37 (62%) fractures were classified as Neer 3 and 23 (38%) were classified as Neer 4. Both groups achieved similar postoperative range of motion. Patients with 3-part fractures reported significantly lower postoperative pain (0.76 ± 1.8 vs. 1.65 ± 2.2, p = 0.0047). Patients with 3-part fractures reported significantly better ASES scores (82.4 ± 19.2 vs. 70.8 ± 21.9, p = 0.02) and non-statistically significant higher SST scores (8.4 ± 3.2 vs. 7.43 ± 3.8, p = 0.14). Adequate fracture union was achieved in 53 fractures (88.3%). Three patients (5%) had varus malunion or greater tuberosity displacement, one (1.7%) had mechanical failure, and three (5%) had radiographic evidence of avascular necrosis. Between groups, there was no difference in failure rates. CONCLUSION: Proximal humeral nails can successfully be used by experienced surgeons in fixation of comminuted and displaced proximal humeral fractures in selected patients with osteoporosis. While patients with both 3- and 4-part fractures demonstrate fracture union with satisfactory outcomes, patients with 3-part fractures demonstrate significantly higher postoperative functional scores.
