ABSTRACT
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) describe measures of a patient's experience throughout medical care as reported by the patient (Mercieca-Bebber et al. in Patient Relat Outcome Meas, 2018). Various PRO instruments exist. It is challenging to select appropriate instruments given the absence of an organizational framework which describes all measurable PROs in dermatologic surgery and represents which instruments measure which outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review all validated PRO instruments in dermatologic surgery and use qualitative analysis to develop an organizational framework representing PRO measures and instruments. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve validated PRO instruments in the dermatologic surgery population. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis was used to develop an organizational framework representing all PROs in dermatologic surgery. All instruments were sorted into this framework. The search identified 3195 articles; 35 validated instruments were extracted and qualitatively analyzed. The organizational framework sorted all instruments into 36 PRO measures aligned with the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (Gershon RC, Rothrock N, Hanrahan R, et al (2010) The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research). Measures were grouped into four categories (expectations, satisfaction, quality of life, needs) describing how patients experience these outcomes and lenses through which researchers can evaluate them. In conclusion, we have proposed an organizational framework for use in choosing validated instruments to develop and answer PRO research questions.
Subject(s)
Cysteamine , Quality of Life , United States , Humans , Cell Movement , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Dermatologic Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of patient satisfaction in ensuring high-quality care, studies investigating patient satisfaction in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) are limited. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the factors associated with patient satisfaction in MMS for nonmelanoma skin cancer and how patient satisfaction changes in the postoperative period. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study including 100 patients, patient satisfaction surveys were administered at the time of surgery and at 3 months postsurgery. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and surgical parameters were collected by chart review. Univariate linear and logistic regression models were created to examine these relationships. RESULTS: Decreased satisfaction was observed in patients requiring 3 or more MMS stages both at the time of surgery (P = .047) and at 3 months post-surgery (P = .0244). Patients with morning procedures ending after 1:00 pm had decreased satisfaction at the time of surgery (P = .019). A decrease in patient satisfaction between the time of surgery and 3 months postsurgery was observed in patients with surgical sites on the extremities (P = .036), larger preoperative lesion sizes (P = .012), and larger defect sizes (P = .033). LIMITATIONS: Single-institution data, self-selection bias, and recall bias. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with MMS is impacted by numerous factors and remains dynamic over time.
