Factors that Promote and Protect Against Financial Toxicity after Orthopaedic Trauma: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Financial toxicity is highly prevalent in patients after an orthopaedic injury. However, little is known regarding the conditions that promote and protect against this financial distress. Our objective was to understand the factors that cause and protect against financial toxicity after a lower extremity fracture. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 patients 3 months after surgical treatment of a lower extremity fracture. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Data saturation occurred after 15 interviews. The percentage of patients who described the identified themes are reported. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (median age, 44 years [IQR, 38 to 58]; 60% male) participated in the study. The most common injury was a distal tibia fracture (n = 8; 40%). Eleven themes that promoted financial distress were identified, the most common being work effects (n = 14; 70%) and emotional health (n = 12; 60%). Over half (n = 11; 55%) of participants described financial toxicity arising from an inability to access social welfare programs. Seven themes that protected against financial distress were also identified, including insurance (n = 17; 85%) and support from friends and family (n = 17; 85%). Over half (n = 13; 65%) of the participants discussed the support they received from their healthcare team, which encompassed expectation setting and connections to financial aid and other services. Employment protection and workplace flexibility were additional protective themes. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study of orthopaedic trauma patients found work and emotional health-related factors to be primary drivers of financial toxicity after injury. Insurance and support from friends and family were the most frequently reported protective factors. Many participants described the pivotal role of the healthcare team in establishing recovery expectations and facilitating access to social welfare programs.

Are extra locking bolts or fibular plating more important in extreme nailing of distal tibia fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

OBJECTIVES: In far-distal extra-articular tibia fracture "extreme" nailing, debate surrounds the relative biomechanical performance of plating the fibula compared with extra distal interlocks. This study aimed to evaluate several constructs for extreme nailing including one interlock (one medial-lateral interlock), one interlock + plate (one medial-lateral interlock with lateral fibula compression plating), and two interlocks (one medial-lateral interlock and one anterior-posterior interlock). METHODS: Fifteen pairs of fresh cadaver legs were instrumented with a tibial nail to the physeal scar. A 1 cm segment of bone was resected from the distal tibia 3.5 cm from the joint and an oblique osteotomy was made in the distal fibula. We loaded specimens with three different distal fixation constructs (one interlock, one interlock + plate, and two interlocks) through 10,000 cycles form 100N-700 N of axial loading. Load to failure (Newtons), angulation and displacement were also measured. RESULTS: Mean load to failure was 2092 N (one interlock), 1917 N (one interlock + plate), and 2545 N (two interlocks). Linear mixed effects modeling demonstrated that two interlocks had a load to failure 578 N higher than one interlock alone (95 % CI, 74N-1082 N; P = 0.02), but demonstrated no significant difference between one interlock and one interlock + plate. No statistically significant difference in rates or timing of displacement >2 mm or angulation >10° were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: When nailing far-distal extra-articular tibia and fibula fractures, adding a second interlock provides more stability than adding a fibular plate. Distal fibula plating may have minimal biomechanical effect in extreme nailing.

The LIMB-Q: Reliability and Validity of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Extremity Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: The LIMB-Q is a novel patient-reported outcome measure for lower extremity trauma patients. The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric validation of the LIMB-Q based on the Rasch Measurement Theory. METHODS: An international, multi-site convenience sample of patients with lower extremity traumatic injuries distal to the mid-femur were recruited via clinical sites (United States, Netherlands) and online platforms (English; Trauma Survivors Network, Prolific). A cross-sectional survey of the LIMB-Q was conducted with test-rest (TRT) measured 1-2 weeks after initial completion in a sub-group of patients. RESULTS: The LIMB-Q was field-tested in 713 patients. The mean age was 41 years (standard deviation (SD) 17, range 18-85), mean time from injury was 7 years (SD 9, range 0-58), and there were variable injury and treatment characteristics (39% fracture surgery only, 38% flap or graft, 13% amputation, 10% amputation and flap/graft). Out of 382 items tested, 164 were retained across 16 scales. Reliability was demonstrated with person separation index values 0.80 and greater in 14 scales (0.78-0.79 in remaining 2 scales), Cronbach alpha values 0.83 and greater, and intraclass correlation coefficient values 0.70 and greater. Each scale was unidimensional, measurement invariance was confirmed across clinical and demographic factors, TRT showed adequate reliability, and construct validity was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The LIMB-Q is a patient reported outcome measure with 16 independently functioning scales (6-15 items per scale) developed and validated specifically for lower extremity trauma patients with fractures, reconstruction, and/or amputation.

Skin Antisepsis before Surgical Fixation of Extremity Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications. RESULTS: A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).

Does treatment at a level I trauma center reduce disparities in patient outcomes for open tibia fractures? A retrospective analysis of the National trauma Databank.

Background: Race and insurance status are independent predictors of healthcare outcomes following lower-extremity trauma. Level 1 trauma centers show better outcomes overall, but it is has not been extensively studied as to whether they specifically lower complication rates and shorten length of stay in those with Black race, with low socioeconomic status, and/or a lack of private health insurance. We performed a study with the objective of determining whether Level I trauma centers can improve the complication rate of those shown to be at high risk of experiencing adverse outcomes due to socioeconomic differences. Hypothesis: Level 1 trauma centers will be successful in mitigating the disparity in complication rates and length of stay associated with racial and socioeconomic differences among trauma patients experiencing an open tibia fracture. Patients and methods: The National Trauma Databank was reviewed from 2008 to 2015, identifying 81,855 encounters with an open tibia fracture, and 33,047 at a Level I trauma center. Regression models determined effects of race and insurance status on outcomes by trauma center while controlling for confounders. Results: Black race [OR 1.36, 95% CI, 1.17-1.58; p < 0.05] and "other" race [OR 1.28, 95% CI, 1.07-1.52; p < 0.05] were associated with higher odds of injury-specific complications. Patients without private insurance and of non-White or Black race in comparison to White patients had a significantly longer length of stay [coefficient 1.66, 95% CI, 1.37-1.94; p < 0.001]. These differences persisted in patients treated at an American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level I trauma center. Discussion: Treatment at an ACS Level I trauma center did not reduce the independent effects of race and insurance status on outcomes after open tibia fracture, emphasizing the need to recognize this disparity and improve care for at-risk populations.

Peripheral Nerve Block Delays Mobility and Increases Length of Stay in Patients With Geriatric Hip Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) has been increasingly used in the care of patients with geriatric hip fracture to reduce perioperative opiate use and the need for general anesthesia. However, the associated motor palsy may impair patients' ability to mobilize effectively after surgery and subsequently may increase latency to key mobility milestones postoperatively, as well as increase inpatient length of stay (LOS). The aim of this study was to investigate time-to-mobility milestones and length of hospital stay between peripheral, epidural, and general anesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 1,351 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery for hip fracture between 2012 and 2018 at a single academic health system. Patients were excluded if baseline nonambulatory, restricted weight-bearing postoperatively, or sustained concomitant injuries precluding mobilization, with a final cohort of 1,013 patients. Time-to-event analyses for discharge and mobility milestones were assessed using univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: PNB was associated with delayed postoperative time to ambulation ( P < 0.001) and time to out-of-bed ( P = 0.029), along with increased LOS ( P < 0.001). Epidural anesthesia was associated with less delay to first out-of-bed ( P = 0.002), less delay to ambulation ( P = 0.001), and overall reduced length of stay ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: PNB was associated with slower mobilization and longer hospitalization while epidural anesthesia was associated with quicker mobilization and shorter hospital stays. Epidural anesthesia may be a preferable anesthesia choice in patients with geriatric hip fracture when possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Critical Risk Factors for Opioid Demand after Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture Surgery.

The characteristics that contribute to opioid demand in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery are not well understood. We hypothesize that fracture pattern and psychiatric comorbidities will be associated with increased opioid demand. This study evaluated perioperative opioid prescription filling in 743 patients undergoing operative fixation of pelvic and acetabular injuries. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between baseline factors and opioid outcomes. Patients filled prescriptions for 111.2, 89.3, and 200.3 oxycodone 5-mg pills at the 1-month preop to 90-days postop, 3-months postop to 1-year postop, and 1-month preop to 1-year postop timeframes. Operatively treated wall, transverse and two-column acetabular fractures were associated with the highest opioid demand. Drug abuse and pre-injury opioid use were the primary non-surgical drivers of opioid demand. Acetabular fractures, pre-injury opioid filling, and drug abuse were the main risk factors for increased perioperative opioid prescription filling. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective, prognostic cohort study. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):041-046, 2023).

The impact of heterotopic ossification prophylaxis after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures: national treatment patterns and related outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures. Numerous strategies have been employed to prevent HO formation, but results are mixed and optimal treatment strategy remains controversial. The purpose of the study was to describe current national heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis patterns among academic trauma centers, determine the association between prophylaxis type and radiographic HO, and identify if heterogeneity in treatment effects exist based on outcome risk strata. METHODS: We used data from a subset of participants enrolled in the Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Alcohol Skin Solutions in Fractured Extremities (PREPARE) trial. We included only patients with closed AO-type 62 acetabular fractures that were surgically treated via a posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck), combined anterior and posterior, or extensile exposure. PREPARE Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03523962 Patient population This cohort study was nested within the Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Alcohol Skin Solutions in Fractured Extremities (PREPARE) trial. The PREPARE trial is a multicenter cluster-randomized crossover trial evaluating the effectiveness of two alcohol-based pre-operative antiseptic skin solutions. All PREPARE trial clinical centers that enrolled at least one patient with a closed AO-type 62 acetabular fracture were invited to participate in the nested study. RESULTS: 277 patients from 20 level 1 and level 2 trauma centers in the U.S. and Canada were included in this study. 32 patients (12%) received indomethacin prophylaxis, 100 patients (36%) received XRT prophylaxis, and 145 patients (52%) received no prophylaxis. Administration of XRT was associated with a 68% reduction in the adjusted odds of overall HO (OR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.14 - 0.69, p = 0.005). The overall severe HO (Brooker classes III or IV) rate was 8% for the entire cohort; XRT reduced the rate of severe HO in high-risk patients only (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: HO prophylaxis patterns after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures have changed dramatically over the last two decades. Most centers included in this study did not administer HO prophylaxis. XRT was associated with a marked reduction in the rate of overall HO and the rate of severe HO in high-risk patients. Randomized trials are needed to fully elucidate the potential benefit of XRT. PREPARE Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03523962.

The characteristics of opioid use in patients with proximal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioid narcotics than any other surgical specialty. Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) often occur in the high-risk elderly population. The opioid epidemic has led to public policy aimed at reductions in opioid prescription. This study aimed to evaluate the impact that new legislation has had on opioid prescription patterns in patients who sustained proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who sustained PHF at a single academic institution from 1/1/2015-12/31/2019 was performed. A total of 762 proximal humerus fractures were identified and final analysis included 383 patients. Collected data included basic demographics and opioid prescriptions obtained through review of the electronic medical record. The North Carolina Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention act legislation that went into effect on July 1, 2017. RESULTS: There was no difference in the number of pre- or postoperative opioid prescriptions provided with the new legislation. Our data showed a significant reduction in MeQs prescribed preoperatively pre-STOP act (188.1 MeQs) and post-STOP act (99.4 MeQs). There was also a significant difference in the amount of postoperative narcotics prescribed in the pre-STOP (972.6 MeQs) and post-STOP act (508.6 MeQs) groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With the enactment of the STOP act in North Carolina, we have seen a significant reduction in the amount of narcotic prescribed after sustaining a proximal humerus fracture preoperatively and postoperatively. This data demonstrates the impact that implementation of state-wide regulatory changes in opioid prescribing policy has had for a common orthopedic condition.

The impact of regional anesthesia on opioid demand in distal radius fracture surgery.

PURPOSE: Regional anesthesia (RA) is commonly used in distal radius fracture surgery to reduce pain and opioid consumption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world impact of RA on inpatient and outpatient opioid consumption and demand in patients undergoing distal radius fracture surgery. METHODS: All patients ages 18 and older undergoing distal radius fracture surgery between 7/2013 and 7/2018 at a single institution (n = 969) were identified. Inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid prescribing in oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (OE's) up to 90-d post-operative were recorded for patients with and without RA. Adjusted models were used to evaluate the impact of RA on opioid outcomes. RESULTS: Adjusted models demonstrated decreases in inpatient opioid consumption in patients with RA (10.7 estimated OE's without RA vs. 7.6 OE's with RA from 0 to 24 h post-op, 10.2 vs. 5.3 from 24 to 48 h post-op and 7.5 vs. 5.0 from 48 to 72 h post-op, p<.05). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand was significantly higher in patients with RA (65.3 OE's without RA vs. 81.0 with RA from 1-month pre-op to 2-week post-discharge, 76.1 vs. 87.7 OE's to 6-weeks, and 80.8 vs. 93.5 OE's to 90-d, all p values for RA <.05) though rates of refill were significantly lower in patients with RA from 2-week to 6-week post-op compared to patients without RA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing RA in distal radius fracture surgery had decreased inpatient opioid consumption but increased outpatient demand after adjustment for patient and operative characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, therapeutic cohort study.

Direct versus indirect posterior malleolar fixation in the treatment of trimalleolar ankle fractures: Is there a difference in outcomes?

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in functional outcomes between direct and indirect surgical fixation methods of the posterior malleolus in the setting of trimalleolar fractures and identify any variables affecting patient outcomes. Methods: Primary outcomes were evaluated by PROMIS scores for short-term outcomes regarding total pain (TP) and total function (TF) comparing 40 patients with direct fixation with 77 with indirect fixation. Continuous variables were analyzed using t tests for parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using a χ2 test. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were performed to analyze factors that affect outcomes of TP and TF. Results: There was no difference in TP or TF between groups (P = 0.65 vs. P = 0.19). On univariate linear regression for TP, BMI, incidence of complication, tobacco use, and open injury showed significance in increasing pain levels with open injuries providing the greatest effect (coef = 11.8). On multivariate analysis, BMI, incidence of complication, open injury, and tourniquet time all significantly increased pain. For TF, univariate analysis showed age, BMI, incidence of complication, and diabetes to decrease function, and use of external fixator and tourniquet time increased function. In the multivariate model, increased BMI, open injuries, and increasing tourniquet time all decreased TF while use of an external fixator increased TF. Conclusion: This study showed no difference in TP and TF using the PROMIS outcome scores when comparing direct fixation versus indirect fixation under univariate and multivariate models. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic III.

Beware the rebound effect: regional anesthesia increases opioid utilization after humerus fracture surgery.

Introduction: Regional anesthesia (RA) is used reduce pain in proximal humerus and humeral shaft fracture surgery. The study hypothesis was that RA would decrease opioid demand in patients undergoing fracture surgery. Materials and methods: Opioid demand was recorded in all patients ages 18 and older undergoing proximal humerus or humeral shaft fracture surgery at a single, Level I trauma center from 7/2013 - 7/2018 (n = 380 patients). Inpatient opioid consumption from 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 h and outpatient opioid demand from 1-month pre-operative to 90-days post-operative were converted to oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (OE's). Unadjusted and adjusted models were constructed to evaluate the impact of RA and other factors on opioid utilization. Results: Adjusted models demonstrated increases in inpatient opioid consumption in patients with RA (6.8 estimated OE's without RA vs 8.8 estimated OE's with RA from 0-24 h post-op; 10 vs 13.7 from 24-48 h post-op; and 8.7 vs 11.6 from 48-72 h post-op; all p < 0.05). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand was significantly higher in patients with RA at all timepoints. Discussion: In proximal humerus and humeral shaft fracture surgery, RA was associated with increased inpatient and outpatient opioid demand after adjusting for baseline patient and treatment characteristics.

Resilience through practicing acceptance: A qualitative study of how patients cope with the psychosocial experiences following limb-threatening lower extremity trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Limb-threatening injuries can have a profound impact on patient lives. The impact on a patient's psychosocial well-being is widespread yet not well understood. This study aims to explore which psychosocial elements are central to patient experiences after limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a qualitative interview-based study to identify psychosocial experiences after limb-threatening lower extremity trauma in a patient-centered manner. Data were collected via semi-structured qualitative interviews and analyzed via an interpretive description approach. Interviews were performed until content saturation was reached. RESULTS: A total of 33 interviews were performed until reaching content saturation. Eleven participants underwent early amputation, 7 delayed amputation after an attempt at limb salvage, and 15 underwent limb salvage. A total of 533 unique psychosocial codes were identified, comprised of eight concepts: acceptance, body image, coping, distress, positive impact, emotional support, isolation, and intrapsychic. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the concerns central to this patient population and developed a conceptual framework for how patients cope with these psychosocial experiences. These findings underscore the importance of developing resilience by actively practicing acceptance and reaching more positive mental health outcomes. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of increasing access to early and routine psychological and social support for patients with severe lower extremity trauma.

Regional Anesthesia Decreases Inpatient But Not Outpatient Opioid Demand in Ankle and Distal Tibia Fracture Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Regional anesthesia (RA) is commonly used in ankle and distal tibia fracture surgery. However, the pragmatic effects of this treatment on inpatient and outpatient opioid demand are unclear. The hypothesis was that RA would decrease inpatient opioid consumption and have little effect on outpatient demand in patients undergoing ankle and distal tibia fracture surgery compared with patients not receiving RA. METHODS: All patients aged 18 years and older undergoing ankle and distal tibia fracture surgery at a single institution between July 2013 and July 2018 were included in this study (n = 1310). Inpatient opioid consumption (0-72 hours postoperatively) and outpatient opioid prescribing (1 month preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively) were recorded in oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (OEs). Adjusted models were used to evaluate the impact of RA versus no RA on inpatient and outpatient opioid demand. RESULTS: Patients without RA had higher rates of high-energy mechanism of injury, additional injuries, open fractures, and additional surgery compared with patients with RA. Adjusted models demonstrated decreased inpatient opioid consumption in patients with RA (12.1 estimated OEs without RA vs 8.8 OEs with RA from 0 to 24 hours postoperatively, P < .001) but no significant difference after that time (9.7 vs 10.4 from 24 to 48 hours postoperatively, and 9.5 vs 8.5 from 48 to 72 hours postoperatively). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand was significantly increased in patients receiving RA at all time points (112.5 OEs without RA vs 137.3 with RA from 1 month preoperatively to 2 weeks, 125.6 vs 155.5 OEs to 6 weeks, and 134.6 vs 163.3 OEs to 90 days, all P values for RA <.001). DISCUSSION: In ankle and distal tibia fracture surgery, RA was associated with decreased early inpatient opioid demand but significantly increased outpatient demand after adjusting for baseline patient and treatment characteristics. This study encourages the use of RA to decrease inpatient opioid use, although there was a worrisome increase in outpatient opioid demand. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective, therapeutic cohort study.

Deltoid ligament repair versus trans-syndesmotic fixation for bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The role of deltoid ligament repair is controversial in the treatment of bimalleolar equivalent ankle injuries. Our purpose was to compare midterm functional outcomes and reoperation rates of unstable distal fibula fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the fibula and either deltoid ligament repair, trans-syndesmotic fixation, or combined fixation. METHODS: Skeletally mature subjects were retrospectively identified after fixation of isolated unstable distal fibula fractures treated at a single academic level 1 hospital from January 2005 to May 2019. The AAOS Foot and Ankle Module outcomes questionnaire (AAOS-FAM) was obtained at a mean time from surgery of 4.6 +/- 3.1 years. Subjects underwent one of three methods of fixation including distal fibula ORIF and one of the following: trans-syndesmotic fixation (N = 66), deltoid ligament repair (N = 16), or combined trans-syndesmotic fixation and deltoid ligament repair (N = 26). Outcomes scores and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were compared between groups by Kruskal-Wallis testing for non-normally distributed data. Rates of reoperation were compared by Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set to P < 0.05 for all comparisons. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in AAOS-FAM scores between the three groups (P = 0.18). No subjects in the deltoid ligament repair group underwent reoperation compared to 17 (26%) in the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and six (23%) in the combined fixation group. The most common reason for reoperation was removal of hardware, which was performed in 12 (18%) subjects in the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and three (12%) subjects in the combined fixation group. CONCLUSIONS: Direct deltoid ligament repair yields similar functional scores and fewer reoperations compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation at midterm follow up. Deltoid ligament repair may be a favorable treatment strategy when considering trans-syndesmotic fixation in the surgical treatment of unstable distal fibula fractures.

Hip Fracture Surgery: Regional Anesthesia and Opioid Demand.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgery is painful, and regional anesthesia (RA) has been used in an attempt to reduce pain and opioid consumption after surgery. Despite potential analgesic benefits, the effect of RA on inpatient and outpatient opioid demand is not well known. We hypothesized that RA would be associated with decreased inpatient opioid demand and has little effect on outpatient opioid demand in hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated all patients of 18 years and older undergoing hip fracture surgery from July 2013 to July 2018 at a single, level I trauma center (n = 1,659). Inpatient opioid consumption in 24-hour increments up to 72-hour postoperative and outpatient opioid prescribing up to 90-day postoperative were recorded in oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (OE's). Adjusted models evaluated the effect of RA on opioid demand after adjusting for other baseline and treatment variables. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline and treatment variables, there were small increases in inpatient opioid consumption in patients with RA (2.6 estimated OE's without RA versus three OE's with RA from 0 to 24 hours postoperatively, 2.1 versus 2.4 from 24 to 48 hours postoperatively, and 1.6 versus 2.2 from 48 to 72 hours postoperatively, all P values for RA <0.001). However, there were no notable differences in outpatient opioid demand. DISCUSSION: RA did not decrease inpatient or outpatient opioid demand in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in this pragmatic study. In fact, there were slight increases in inpatient opioid consumption, although these differences are likely clinically insignificant. These results temper enthusiasm for RA in hip fracture surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, therapeutic cohort study.

Psychological resilience as a predictor of opioid consumption after orthopaedic trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Psychological distress after orthopaedic trauma negatively affects patient outcomes. Resilience may mediate distress and therefore be associated with post-operative outcomes, including opioid use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between resilience and post-operative opioid demand with the hypothesis that low levels of resilience are associated with increased opioid consumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients age 18 - 65 at a single, tertiary care level 1 trauma center who underwent operative treatment of pelvic and/ or extremity fractures between 3/2017 - 6/2018 were contacted by phone to complete the OSPRO-YF, a ten-item screening tool that assesses psychological distress. Participants were screened for scores in the worst quartile (i.e., yellow flag) for resilience. Baseline patient and injury characteristics and opioid demand were compared between patients with and without positive yellow flags for resilience using Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were surveyed. Patients with positive yellow flag screening scores for resilience had significantly higher opioid demand, number of opioid prescriptions filled, and were more likely to refill prescriptions long-term (3-months post-discharge to one-year post-discharge). Patients with a positive yellow flag for resilience had a significantly higher number of opioid prescriptions filled in the cumulative (one-month pre-op to one-year post-discharge) time period. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: Lower long-term resilience scores were associated with higher postoperative opioid consumption, fill and refill rates. These results suggest low resilience may be a risk factor for increased long-term opioid consumption following surgical treatment for orthopaedic trauma.

Regional Anesthesia Associated With Decreased Inpatient and Outpatient Opioid Demand in Tibial Plateau Fracture Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia (RA) has been used to reduce pain and opioid usage in elective orthopedic surgery. The hypothesis of this study was that RA would be associated with decreased opioid demand in tibial plateau fracture surgery. METHODS: Inpatient opioid consumption and 90-day outpatient opioid prescribing in all patients ≥18 years of age undergoing tibial plateau fracture surgery from July 2013 to July 2018 (n = 264) at a single, level I trauma center were recorded. The presence or absence of perioperative RA was noted. Of 60 patients receiving RA, 52 underwent peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) with single-shot sciatic-popliteal (40.0%; n = 24), femoral (26.7%; n = 16), adductor canal (18.3%; n = 11), or fascia iliaca (1.7%; n = 1) block with ropivacaine. Ten patients received epidural analgesia (EA) with either single-shot spinal (11.7%; n = 7) blocks or continuous epidural (5.0%; n = 3). Additional baseline and treatment characteristics were recorded, including age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking, chronic opioid use, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, injury mechanism, additional injuries, open injury, and additional inpatient surgery. Statistical models, including multivariable generalized linear models with propensity score weighting to adjust for baseline patient and treatment characteristics, were used to assess perioperative opioid demand with and without RA. RESULTS: RA was associated with reduced inpatient opioid usage from 0 to 24 hours postoperatively of approximately 5.2 oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (0.74 incident rate ratio [IRR]; 0.63-0.86 CI; P < .001) and from 24 to 48 hours postoperatively of approximately 2.9 oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (0.78 IRR; 0.64-0.95 CI; P = .014) but not at 48 to 72 hours postoperatively. From 1 month preoperatively to 2 weeks postoperatively, RA was associated with reduced outpatient opioid prescribing of approximately 24.0 oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (0.87; 0.75-0.99; P = .044) and from 1 month preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively of approximately 44.0 oxycodone 5-mg equivalents (0.83; 0.71-0.96; P = .011), although there was no significant difference from 1 month preoperatively to 6 weeks postoperatively. There were no cases of acute compartment syndrome in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In tibial plateau fracture surgery, RA was associated with reduced inpatient opioid consumption up to 48 hours postoperatively and reduced outpatient opioid demand up to 90 days postoperatively without an associated risk of acute compartment syndrome. RA should be considered for patients undergoing tibial plateau fracture fixation.

Regional anesthesia does not decrease opioid demand in pelvis and acetabulum fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures often have considerable pain in the perioperative period. Regional anesthesia (RA) including peripheral nerve blocks and spinal analgesia may reduce pain. However, the real-world impact of these modalities on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative RA on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational review of inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in all patients ages 18 and older undergoing operative fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures at a single Level, I trauma center from 7/1/2013-7/1/2018 (n = 205). Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were constructed to evaluate the impact of RA on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand while controlling for age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking, chronic opioid use, ASA score, injury mechanism, additional injuries, open injury, and additional inpatient surgery. RESULTS: Adjusted models demonstrated increases in inpatient opioid consumption in patients with RA (12.6 estimated OE's without RA vs 16.1 OE's with RA from 48 to 72 h post-op, p < 0.05) but no significant differences at other timepoints (17.5 estimated OE's without RA vs 16.8 OE's with RA from 0 to 24 h post-op, 15.3 vs 17.1 from 24 to 48 h post-op, p > 0.05). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand was significantly higher in patients with RA at discharge to 90 days post-op (and 156.8 vs 207.9 OE's to 90 days, p < 0.05) but did not differ significantly before that time (121.5 OE's without RA vs 123.9 with RA from discharge to two weeks, 145.2 vs 177.2 OE's to 6 weeks, p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: In pelvis and acetabulum fracture surgery, RA was associated with increased inpatient and outpatient opioid demand after adjusting for baseline patient and treatment characteristics. Regional anesthesia may not be beneficial for these patients.

Regional anesthesia reduces inpatient and outpatient perioperative opioid demand in periarticular elbow surgery.

HYPOTHESIS: Regional anesthesia (RA) can be used to manage perioperative pain in the treatment of periarticular elbow fracture fixation. However, the opioid-sparing benefit is not well-characterized. The hypothesis of this study was that RA had reduced inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in patients who had undergone periarticular elbow fracture surgery. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviews inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in all patients aged ≥18 years at a single Level I trauma center undergoing fixation of periarticular elbow (distal humerus and proximal forearm) fracture surgery (n=418 patients). In addition to RA vs. no RA, additional patient and operative characteristics were recorded. Unadjusted and adjusted models were constructed to evaluate the impact of RA and other factors on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand. RESULTS: Adjusted models demonstrated decreases in inpatient opioid consumption postoperation in patients with RA (13.7 estimated oxycodone 5-mg equivalents or OEs without RA vs. 10.4 OEs with RA from 0 to 24 hours postoperation, P = .003; 12.3 vs. 9.2 OEs from 24 to 48 hours postoperation, P = .045). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand differed significantly in patients with RA (166.1 vs. 132.1 OEs to 6 weeks, P = .002; and 181 vs. 138.6 OEs to 90 days, P < .001). DISCUSSION: In proximal forearm and distal humerus fracture surgery, RA was associated with decreased inpatient and outpatient opioid demand after adjusting for baseline patient and treatment characteristics. These results encourage utilization of perioperative RA to reduce opioid use.