Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We compare the reliability and define the role of plain film radiography and CT in the assessment of various severities of small-bowel obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A blinded retrospective analysis was done on 78 patients who underwent plain abdominal radiography, CT, and enteroclysis to assess for suspected small-bowel obstruction. The findings at enteroclysis and the clinical outcomes were used as standards of reference. RESULTS: The sensitivity of plain film radiography for revealing small-bowel obstruction was 69% (44/64), and its specificity was 57% (8/14). Overall accuracy of plain film radiography was 67% (52/78). The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 64% (41/64) and 79% (11/ 14), respectively. Overall accuracy of CT was 67% (52/78). When obstructions were classified as low- and high-grade partial obstruction, plain film radiography and CT had sensitivities of 86% (24/28) and 82% (23/28), respectively, for high-grade obstruction and 56% (20/36) and 50% (18/36), respectively, for low-grade obstruction. CT revealed the cause of the small-bowel obstruction in 95% (39/41) of those patients in who CT correctly showed the obstruction. CONCLUSION: Plain film radiography and CT had similar overall accuracies in showing small-bowel obstruction of various severities. Plain film radiography should remain the initial method of imaging patients with suspected small-bowel obstruction. The ability of CT to show the cause of small-bowel obstruction makes CT an important additional diagnostic tool when specific management issues must be addressed.

Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis.

The reliability of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of varying degrees of small bowel obstruction (SBO) was evaluated by using results at enteroclysis and clinical outcome as standards of reference. A blinded retrospective analysis was performed of the studies of 55 patients who underwent both CT and enteroclysis in the course of assessment for suspected SBO. Nine patients had no obstruction, 40 patients had obstruction due to adhesions, and six patients had tumor-related obstruction. CT results were used to identify correctly 63% (29 of 46) of those who had SBO and 78% (seven of nine) of the patients who did not. The overall accuracy of the CT interpretations to help establish diagnosis was 65% (36 of 55). When obstructions were classified into low- and high-grade partial obstruction, CT results could be used to identify correctly 81% (17 of 21) of high-grade SBOs and 48% (12 of 25) of low-grade SBOs. The procedure yielded two false-positive and 13 false-negative results for patients with low-grade obstruction, revealed masses in all six cases with tumor-related obstruction, and helped predict the correct cause in all true-positive cases.