Prognostic Factors and Primary Healing on Root Perforation Repaired with MTA: A 14-year Longitudinal Study.

INTRODUCTION: Few data are available on the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating root canal perforations. This prospective cohort study builds on a previously reported trial to determine the outcome for teeth with root perforations treated with orthograde MTA after longer follow-up and identify potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, enrolling (1999-2009) patients with a single dental perforation treated with MTA. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information was evaluated, and the outcomes were dichotomized as healed or nonhealing. Patients were followed up yearly until 2018 for a maximum of 17 years after treatment, with controls carried out until 14 years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using standardized follow-up protocols. RESULTS: Of the 124 entrolled patients (median age = 36.5 years, 53.2% male), 115 were healed at the first (n = 110, 89%) or second (n = 5, 4%) annual posttreatment checkup, while 9 subjects (7%, 4 females, 18-65 years old) did not heal. Characteristics significantly associated with nonhealing were gender, positive probing, size, and perforation site. Perforations recurred in 48 teeth during the follow-up with the estimated probability of reversal at 5, 10, and 14 years of 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-10%), 30% (95% CI, 20%-38%), and 62% (95% CI, 46%-73%), respectively. Positive probing had a higher reversal risk (hazard ratio = 3.3, P ≤ .001), and perforations >3 mm were more likely to have a reversal (hazard ratio = 4.1, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of reversal for healed MTA-treated root canal perforations, initially relatively low, vastly increases over time.

Removal of surgical smear layer.

INTRODUCTION: During apicoectomy and retrograde cavity preparation, a smear layer, which contains microorganisms and necrotic pulpal tissues, is formed on the dentinal surfaces cut by the instruments. Bacteria can survive and proliferate inside or below the smear layer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vitro two different procedures for the removal of the smear layer in retrocavities prepared with ultrasonic retrotips. METHODS: Twenty-eight single-rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped, and obturated with gutta-percha and sealer. The apical 3 mm of each root were cut with a carbide bur, and retrograde cavities were prepared with ProUltra ultrasonic retrotips (Maillefer Dentsply, Baillagues, Switzerland) at a depth of 3 mm. Teeth in group A were treated with a gel of 35% orthophosphoric acid for 15 seconds, and teeth in group B were treated with a gel of 24% EDTA at a neutral pH for 2 minutes. The samples were prepared for scanning electron microscopic observation and scored for the presence of the smear layer on the retrocavity walls. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the teeth in group A showed an optimal degree of cleanliness of the walls, with dentinal tubules completely open. The majority of analyzed samples coming from group B showed dentinal tubules covered with the smear layer. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the samples showed that orthophosphoric acid is more effective than EDTA in removing surgical smear layer even with less time of action.

The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up.

Retreatment is common in endodontics. The purpose of this article was to classify the different clinical situations encountered in retreatment cases and relate them to the outcome after an observation period of 24 months. A total of 425 patients (452 teeth) from 451 patients, consecutively admitted for root-canal retreatment, were monitored during a 24-month period. All teeth (254 molars, 107 premolars, and 91 single-root anterior teeth) were divided into two major categories: teeth with modified anatomy from previous endodontic treatment (root-canal-morphology altered) and teeth in which no significant anatomical changes were made by the former endodontic treatment (root-canal-morphology respected). Although the overall success was 69.03%, the success in the root-canal-morphology-respected group was 86.8% and in the root-canal-morphology-altered group 47% (Mann-Whitney U test p < 0.0001). The clinical success of an endodontic retreatment seems to depend on whether alterations in the natural course of the root canals were caused by previous root-canal treatment.