Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 124(3): 101395, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36702352

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the predisposing factors of this deafness after orthognathic surgery for a population with no history of cleft palate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with significant auditory symptoms after orthognathic surgery performed in the department of Craniomaxillofacial surgery in the Croix Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France, since 2012 were included in the study. The exclusion criterion was a history of cleft palate. Bone movements performed during orthognathic surgery were analyzed. An audiometric assessment, including Pure Tone Audiometry and tympanometry, was performed at day 30 (D30), day 60 (D60) and day 90 (D90). RESULTS: Six patients were included in the study. All patients were women with a mean age of 33.5 years and suffered from class III skeletal deformities. The average hearing loss was 40 dB at D30, 20 dB at D60 and 5 dB at D90 with sometimes differences between the two ears. Five patients had a type C tympanogram suggesting Eustachian tube dysfunction and one patient had a type B tympanogram. All patients benefited from maxillary advancement of 5 mm on average. DISCUSSION: This study allows to conclude that female patients with a history of allergy or catarrhal tubal deafness are at risk of deafness after orthognathic surgery. These patients must be informed of this complication before surgery and be reassured about its reversibility.


Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Deafness , Eustachian Tube , Hearing Loss , Humans , Female , Adult , Male , Eustachian Tube/surgery , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/etiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Osteotomy, Le Fort
2.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 7(2): 388-394, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35434327

ABSTRACT

Background: Internal valve collapse is a frequent cause of nasal obstruction but remains poorly understood and is sometimes treated inappropriately as a result. No functional or imaging test for the condition has been validated and the reference diagnostic technique is physical examination. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of four-phase rhinomanometry as a diagnostic test for internal valve collapse. Methods: In a case-control diagnostic accuracy study, the nostrils of adult patients consulting for chronic nasal obstruction were classified as "collapsed" or "non-collapsed" based on clinical findings. Four-phase rhinomanometry was performed in all patients. The area defined by the path of the flow/pressure curve in the two phases of inspiration (the "inspiratory loop area" or "hysteresis loop area") was calculated for both nasal cavities and the threshold value with the highest Youden index was identified. Results: Sixty-six patients (132 nostrils) were included with 72 nostrils classified as collapsed and 60 as non-collapsed. Before nasal decongestion, the inspiratory loop area with the highest Youden index was 17.3 Pa L s-1 and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 88.3% (95% confidence interval, 80.0-95.0%) and 89.9% (82.6-95.7%), respectively. Conclusions: In these patients, a cutoff inspiratory loop area in four-phase rhinomanometry data reproduced clinical diagnoses of internal valve collapse with high sensitivity and specificity. This method may offer a firmer basis for treatment indications than subjective physical examinations. Level of evidence: Level 4.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...