Stage migration of testicular germ cell tumours in Alberta, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: An absence of screening recommendations and the rapid progression of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) offer a perspective on the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer presentations. We evaluated the presenting cancer stages of TGCTs in a real-world population before and during the pandemic to assess stage migration. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all new patients with TGCT diagnoses in Alberta, Canada, from Dec. 31, 2018, to Apr. 30, 2021, using the Alberta Cancer Registry. Because potential changes in staging should not occur instantaneously, we used a 6-month lag time from Apr. 1, 2020, for seminomas, and a 3-month lag time for nonseminomas, to compare initial cancer stages at presentation before and during the pandemic. We evaluated monthly rates of presentation by stage and histology. Exploratory outcomes included the largest tumour dimension, tumour markers and, for advanced disease, risk category and treatment setting. RESULTS: Of 335 patients with TGCTs, 231 were diagnosed before the pandemic and 104 during the pandemic (using a lag time). In total, 18 (7.8%) patients diagnosed before the pandemic presented with stage III disease, compared to 16 (15.4%) diagnosed during the pandemic (relative risk 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-3.72). We observed no significant differences for secondary outcomes. Without a lag time, the rate ratio for a stage II presentation decreased significantly during the pandemic (0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.72). INTERPRETATION: We observed signs of TGCT stage migration during the COVID-19 pandemic, driven by a decline in stage II disease and a potential rise in stage III disease. Management of TGCTs should remain a priority, even during a global pandemic.

Real-World Cabazitaxel Use and Outcomes in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Response to First ARPI.

BACKGROUND: For post-docetaxel treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), cabazitaxel has demonstrated superior third line PFS and OS compared to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in patients who progress within 12 months on first ARPI. The impact of first ARPI response, in particular responses beyond 12 months, on cabazitaxel outcomes in real-world populations is uncertain, as are other factors impacting cabazitaxel use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: mCRPC patients in Alberta, Canada who received docetaxel from October 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 were included. We reviewed mCRPC therapies, correlating cabazitaxel use with patient characteristics and TROPIC trial inclusion/exclusion criteria. OS and PFS were evaluated in patients who received cabazitaxel, stratified by time to progression on first ARPI ≤ 12 months (poor ARPI responders, PAR) or >12 months (strong ARPI responders, SAR), using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: PAR patients had inferior OS compared to SAR patients (12.3 vs. 24.8 months, P < .001). OS was longer in PAR patients receiving cabazitaxel compared to those not treated with cabazitaxel (16.9 vs. 10.3 months, P = .015), but this benefit was not seen in the SAR group (17.1 vs. 32 months, P = .084). Cabazitaxel use was associated with reduced PFS first line post-docetaxel in SAR (3.5 vs. 14.7 months, P < .001) but not PAR patients. Of 592 patients, 170 (29%) received cabazitaxel post-docetaxel, compared to 280 (47%) and 250 (42%) for abiraterone and enzalutamide. 238 patients (40%) did not have a discussion of cabazitaxel documented. Cabazitaxel use was increased in patients who fit TROPIC trial criteria (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world mCRPC cohort, cabazitaxel use was associated with longer OS among PAR patients, but crucially not among strong ARPI responders. Cabazitaxel was used less frequently and later than ARPIs post-docetaxel. These data help support first ARPI progression time as a consideration in treatment sequencing.