Evolving standard in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents.

Coronary stent implantation is the predominant method of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This is to be attributed to the ease of use beside the better short and long term clinical outcome as compared to balloon angioplasty. Nevertheless, improvements in operator skill and stent technology together with better use of adjunctive pharmacological therapy have contributed to the improvement in clinical outcome. However, the main limitation of coronary stenting is still represented by in-stent restenosis (ISR) with an estimated rate of 17-32%. Thus, compared to coronary bypass surgery, the major adverse cardiac events following stent implantation are still higher and mainly represented by the need for re-intervention. The advent of drug eluting stents (DES) has led the experts to predict that with DES there will be little or no difference between PCI and coronary bypass surgery in terms of long-term outcome leading to a further expansion of indications. The clinical trial programs of the 2 available DES for clinical use (sirolimus-eluting stent, SES - Cypher and paclitaxol-eluting stent - Taxus) have been able to demonstrate the safety and clinical efficacy of both. Nevertheless, off-label use in patients on high risk for restenosis confirmed these data. At least for SES as was demonstrated by 2 "real world" registries. Thus, the introduction of DES represents a remarkable evolution for new standards in coronary artery disease treatment and offers hope to those patients considered to be "high risk" such as diabetics, patients with ISR, diffuse disease in whom surgery was previously the only therapeutic option. This paper will discuss the main results of the clinical trial programs of the DES (mentioned above) available for clinical use in the present time and analyze technical and procedural aspects which could affect long term outcome.

Mortality and morbidity in reoperation comparing to first intervention in coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery reoperation represents about 20% of coronary artery operations. In this study we compared mortality and morbidity of first intervention and redo operation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: a retrospective study. SETTINGS: patients who underwent coronary artery reoperations in a University Cardiac Surgery Division in 1991-1994. PATIENTS: our clinical survey was composed of two groups: group A included 44 consecutive patients (mean age 60+/-7 years, males/females=41/3) who underwent a coronary artery reoperation in the years 1991-1994 at the University Cardiac Surgery Division of Turin; group B included 344 patients (mean age 58+/-8 years, males/females=289/55) randomly selected among those who underwent a first coronary operation in the above indicated period of time and centre. All patients had angina pectoris refractory to maximal medical therapy. INTERVENTIONS: all patients underwent a coronary artery operation in extracorporeal circulation (ECC), under mild hypothermia (30-32 degrees C), during a single aortic clamp period, with antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia (St. Thomas). MEASURES: comparison of clinical preoperative features, risk factors and postoperative mortality and morbidity between the two groups. RESULTS: In reoperated patients we observed a greater mean akinesis score (p<0.001) and severe left ventricular dysfunction presence (p=0.014). Reoperation mortality was 11.4% against first operation mortality of 3.2% (p=0.03). Female gender (p=0.03), intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation need (p=0.002), adrenaline use (p=0.004) and low cardiac output syndrome (p=0.007) were all perioperative risk factors in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery reoperation involves a higher mortality and morbidity compared to the first operation, especially related to the reduced left ventricular function which characterises the population that undergoes reoperation.

Myocardial infarction before the age of 40 years is associated with insulin resistance.

Insulin resistance is associated with atherosclerosis, and hyperinsulinemia is predictive of coronary heart disease. However, a quantitative estimation of in vivo insulin sensitivity in juvenile myocardial infarction is still lacking and the mechanism of hyperinsulinemia is unknown. We estimated insulin sensitivity, beta-cell secretion, and hepatic insulin extraction using the minimal model analysis of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) in 25 normal-weight subjects without glucose intolerance and hypertension who had an acute myocardial infarction before the age of 40 years, and 10 control subjects comparable for age, sex, body mass index, and blood pressure. All patients underwent a coronary angiography. Insulin sensitivity was significantly lower in patients than in control subjects (mean +/- SEM, 4.6 +/- 0.6 v8.5 +/- 1.2 10(-4). min(-1)(microU/mL), P = .002). The basal C-peptide secretion rate (P = .02), total C-peptide secretion (P = .005), area under the curve (AUC) of insulin (P = .04) and C-peptide (P = .01), and hepatic insulin extraction (P = .04) were higher in patients versus control subjects. In conclusion, insulin resistance is evident in subjects with early myocardial infarction accurately selected to avoid the influence of other factors known to reduce insulin sensitivity, and hyperinsulinemia is due to an increase in beta-cell secretion rather than a decrease in hepatic insulin extraction.

Acute myocardial infarction in young adults: prognostic role of angiotensin-converting enzyme, angiotensin II type I receptor, apolipoprotein E, endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase, and glycoprotein IIIa genetic polymorphisms at medium-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: A number of reports have investigated the association between various gene polymorphisms and the phenotypic expression of myocardial infarction. No investigations have evaluated the prognostic role of genetic factors in young people with premature coronary disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of genetic factors compared with that of conventional risk factors on follow-up events in a population of Italian young adults with myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 106 young patients (mean age 40 +/- 4 years, range 23 to 45 years) with diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clinical and genetic data from the group of patients with events during follow-up were compared with those from patients without events. The following genetic polymorphisms were tested: angiotensin I converting enzyme, angiotensin II type I receptor, apolipoprotein E (ApoE), endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase, and platelet glycoprotein IIIa. Coronary angiography was performed in 94 patients. Coronary angiography showed coronary artery disease in 93% of patients. During follow-up (46 +/- 12 months, range 25 to 72) the overall combined end points (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures) accounted for 21 events. Family history of coronary artery disease, smoking, stenosis of the left anterior descending artery at coronary angiography, and ApoE polymorphism (presence of epsilon4 allele) were significantly more prevalent (univariate analysis) in the group of patients with events. Logistic multivariate analysis showed that ApoE polymorphism (P =. 004, odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2 to 22), family history (P =.005, OR 8.3, 95% CI 2 to 35), smoking after acute myocardial infarction (P =.008, OR 10.9, 95% CI 2 to 62), and left anterior descending coronary artery disease (P =.02. OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 33) were independent predictors of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction at a young age is commonly characterized by evidence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors and by a favorable prognosis in short- and medium-term follow-up. Evidence of significant disease at coronary angiography suggests the presence of a premature atherosclerotic process. ApoE polymorphism (presence of epsilon4 allele) appears to be a strong independent predictor of adverse events, suggesting a remarkable influence in the accelerated coronary disease.