[Tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylactic treatment against SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplantation patients]. / Tixagevimab-cilgavimab como tratamiento profiláctico preexposición frente a SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes trasplantados renales.

INTRODUCTION: It has been reported that after vaccination with RNAm or viral vectors from SARS-CoV-2 a significant number of solid organ transplant recipients do not develop an effective immune response. In this scenario, the use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab was approved by the European Medicines Agency for COVID-19 prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients in March 2022. We present our experience with a group of kidney transplant recipients who received prophylactic treatment with tixagevimab-cilgavimab. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study from a cohort of kidney transplant recipients who had been previously vaccinated with 4 doses and did not achieve a satisfactory immune response to vaccination, presenting antibody titers lower than 260 BAU/mL when measured by ELISA. A total of 55 patients who received a single dose of 150mg of tixagevimab and 150mg of cilgavimab between May and September of 2022 were included in this study. RESULTS: No immediate or severe adverse reactions, including worsening of kidney function, were observed after administering the drug or during follow up. All patients who had received the drug 3 months prior presented positive antibody titers (>260 BAU/mL). Seven patients were diagnosed with COVID, and one of those patients had to be admitted to the hospital and died 5 days later from infectious complications and a suspected diagnosis of bacterial coinfection. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, all kidney transplant recipients reached antibody titers higher than 260 BAU/mL 3 months after receiving prophylactic treatment with tixagevimab-cilgavimab with no severe or irreversible adverse reactions.

[Tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylactic treatment against SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplantation patients]. / Tixagevimab-cilgavimab como tratamiento profiláctico preexposición frente a SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes trasplantados renales.

Introduction: It has been reported that after vaccination with RNAm or viral vectors from SARS-CoV-2 a significant number of solid organ transplant recipients do not develop an effective immune response. In this scenario, the use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab was approved by the European Medicines Agency for COVID-19 prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients in March 2022. We present our experience with a group of kidney transplant recipients who received prophylactic treatment with tixagevimab-cilgavimab. Material and methods: Prospective study from a cohort of kidney transplant recipients who had been previously vaccinated with 4 doses and did not achieve a satisfactory immune response to vaccination, presenting antibody titers lower than 260 BAU/mL when measured by ELISA. A total of 55 patients who received a single dose of 150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab between May and September of 2022 were included in this study. Results: No immediate or severe adverse reactions, including worsening of kidney function, were observed after administering the drug or during follow up. All patients who had received the drug 3 months prior presented positive antibody titers (> 260 BAU/mL). Seven patients were diagnosed with COVID, and one of those patients had to be admitted to the hospital and died 5 days later from infectious complications and a suspected diagnosis of bacterial coinfection. Conclusions: In our experience, all kidney transplant recipients reached antibody titers higher than 260 BAU/mL 3 months after receiving prophylactic treatment with tixagevimab-cilgavimab with no severe or irreversible adverse reactions.

A Current Review of the Etiology, Clinical Features, and Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant Patients.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the most common infection after kidney transplantation and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, with a potential impact on graft survival. UTIs after KT are usually caused by Gram-negative microorganisms. Other pathogens which are uncommon in the general population should be considered in KT patients, especially BK virus since an early diagnosis is necessary to improve the prognosis. UTIs following kidney transplantation are classified into acute simple cystitis, acute pyelonephritis/complicated UTI, and recurrent UTI, due to their different clinical presentation, prognosis, and management. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) represents a frequent finding after kidney transplantation, but ASB is considered to be a separate entity apart from UTI since it is not necessarily a disease state. In fact, current guidelines do not recommend routine screening and treatment of ASB in KT patients, since a beneficial effect has not been shown. Harmful effects such as the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and a higher incidence of Clostridium difficile diarrhea have been associated with the antibiotic treatment of ASB.

Markers of inflammation before and during peritoneal dialysis.

In this study, we compared changes in inflammatory markers-C-reactive protein (CRP), pentraxin 3 (PTX3), serum component of amyloid A (SAA), and procalcitonin (PCT)-in 182 subjects: 69 from the general population (GP), 47 with CKD, 19 with an implanted intra-abdominal catheter for peritoneal dialysis ("prePD"), and 47 on peritoneal dialysis (PD). These were the results [median (95% confidence interval)] for the GP CKD, prePD, and PD groups respectively: CRP: 1.40 mg/L (1.15-2.10 mg/L), 5.30 mg/L (3.04-8.06 mg/L), 3.33 mg/L (2.15-12.58 mg/L), 7.25 mg/L (4.43-15.16 mg/L). SAA: 3.10 mg/L (2.90-3.53 mg/L), 7.77 mg/L (4.17-15.83 mg/L), 7.30 mg/L (4.81-10.96 mg/L), 9.14 mg/L (5.31-23.54 mg/L). PCT: 0.028 ng/mL (0.022-0.032 ng/mL), 0.121 ng/mL (0.094-0.166 ng/mL), 0.160 ng/mL (0.090-0.277 ng/mL), 0.363 ng/mL (0.222-0.481 ng/mL). PTX3: 0.54 ng/mL (0.33-0.62 ng/mL), 0.71 ng/ mL (0.32-1.50 ng/mL), 0.56 ng/mL (0.44-1.00 ng/ mL), 1.04 ng/mL (0.65-1.56 ng/mL). After catheter insertion, CRP showed a nonsignificant declining trend that disappeared throughout PD. The behavior of SAA was similar to that of CRP and was not modified by the changes induced by the start of PD. An increase in PTX3 was observed only with PD, which may be related to a local proinflammatory state caused by PD solution. We can conclude that catheter insertion for PD does not account for most of the local inflammatory changes observed in PD patients.

Inflammation markers, chronic kidney disease, and renal replacement therapy.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a proinflammatory state and an excess of cardiovascular risk. In this work, we describe changes in inflammatory markers-C-reactive protein (CRP), pentraxin 3 (PTX3), serum component of amyloid A (SAA), and procalcitonin (PCT)--in CKD patients compared with a control group of subjects with a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Blood samples were obtained from 69 healthy individuals (GP) and 70 end-stage CKD patients--25 not yet on dialysis, 22 on peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 23 on hemodialysis (HD). These were the results [median (95% confidence interval)] for the GP CKD, PD, and HD groups respectively: CRP: 1.40 mg/L (1.19-2.11 mg/L), 6.50 mg/L (3.57-8.32mg/L), 7.60 mg/L (2.19-22.10mg/L), 9.60 mg/L (6.62-16.38 mg/L). SAA: 3.10 mg/L (2.90-3.53 mg/L), 7.11 mg/L (3.81-15.40mg/L), 9.69 mg/L (5.07-29.47mg/L), 15.90 mg/L (6.80-37.48 mg/L). PCT: 0.03 ng/mL (0.02-0.03 ng/mL), 0.12 ng/mL (0.09-0.16 ng/mL), 0.32 ng/mL (0.20-0.46 ng/ mL), 0.79 ng/mL (0.45-0.99 ng/mL). PTX3: 0.54 ng/mL (0.33-0.62 ng/mL), 0.71 ng/ mL (0.32-1.50 ng/mL), 1.52 ng/mL (0.65-2.13 ng/mL), 1.67 ng/mL (1.05-2.27 ng/mL). Compared with levels in the GP group, levels of SAA and CRP (systemic response) were significantly higher in CKD patients on and not on dialysis. Levels of PTX3 were higher only in dialyzed patients, significantly so in those on HD (greatly different from the CRP levels). These differing levels might be related to a local reaction caused by an invasive intervention (PD or HD). As eGFR declines and with the start of renal replacement therapy, PCT increases. Levels of PCT could potentially cause confusion when these patients are being evaluated for the presence of infection, and may also demonstrate some microvascular implications of dialysis therapy.