ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Some prostatic lesions contain small suspicious foci for prostatic carcinoma in which the morphological features are equivocal. Two immunohistochemical markers namely, cytokeratin 34 beta E12 (Ck34ßE12) and α-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), were evaluated in these lesions for a definitive diagnosis and avoiding misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 90 paraffin embedded blocks of prostatic tissue were selected and categorized into three groups as follows: 50 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 20 cases of prostatic carcinoma, and 20 cases of benign prostatic lesions with suspicious foci labeled as ASAP (atypical small acinar proliferation) that occupy not more than 5% of the lesion. These cases were revised for histopathological diagnosis and stained with two immunohistochemical markers: Ck34ßE12 and AMACR. RESULTS: While 92.9% of BPH were positive for Ck34ßE12, 96% of prostatic carcinoma were negative for this marker (P=0.0001). Regarding AMACR, 92.9% of BPH cases were negative, but 92% of prostatic carcinoma cases were positive for this marker (P=0.0001). Out of 20 cases of BPH, 15 cases containing suspicious foci showed Ck34ßE12+/AMACR- (diagnosis: benign), but 5 cases were Ck34ßE12-/AMACR+, for which the diagnosis changed to prostatic carcinoma (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical staining with Ck34ßE12 and AMACR improved the diagnostic performance and increased confidence level for establishing definite diagnosis in cases with suspicious foci, in which the morphological features were equivocal. This could help to avoid misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of prostatic carcinoma that would eventually improve the management of the patient and subsequently the prognosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Specific cytokines are related to pathologically changed prostate, propose that the balance in cytokine differs in normal and pathological prostate. Of these cytokines the interleukins 10, due to its "pleiotropic" actions in inflammation and angiogenesis, and HSP-90 due to its expression in tumor cells at high levels, suggesting that it has an important role for growth and/or survival of tumor cells. AIMS: Evaluation of HSP-90 and IL10 immunoreactivity in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic carcinoma and to correlate this expression with clinicopathological parameters. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective study in which 83 Paraffin-embedded tissue specimens including (43) BPH, (40) prostatic carcinoma and (20) normal prostate as control were included between the period of January 2015 and January 2017. PATIENTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: All the cases were evaluated histopathologically and stained immunohistochemically for IL10 and HSP-90. Only cytoplasmic staining was considered as positive. Immunoreactivity scoring for both markers expression was calculated based on both staining intensity and percentage. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Was done using SPSS Version 21 statistical analysis software. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: Statistical analysis of HSP-90 and IL10 expression revealed a highly significant correlation of expression of these two markers in advanced Gleason grading and tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging cases of prostatic carcinoma. CONCLUSION: High expression of IL10 and HSP-90 is associated with high grade and stage of prostatic carcinoma. This provides a base for further studies and researches on the role of these investigated proteins as prognostic markers immunotherapy targets for carcinoma of the prostate.
