Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20182018 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29563124

ABSTRACT

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are increasingly used in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated or intolerable. Migration of fragments is a known complication of IVC filter use. We present a case of a 32-year-old man, who presented with right-sided chest pain believed to be caused by a migrated IVC fragment to the right ventricle. The filter was removed by an endovascular cook forceps with the assistance of intracardiac echocardiography. This case serves as an addition to the existing reports of successful removal of intracardiac fragments via minimally invasive endovascular approach, amid a larger number of intracardiac fragments that have been removed by an open-heart approach.


Subject(s)
Device Removal/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Equipment Failure , Foreign-Body Migration/surgery , Heart Ventricles/surgery , Vena Cava Filters , Adult , Echocardiography , Foreign-Body Migration/diagnostic imaging , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Surgical Instruments , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
J Hosp Med ; 12(5): 356-368, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28459908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing homes are common, costly, and morbid. PURPOSE: Systematic literature review of strategies to reduce UTIs in nursing home residents. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science and Embase through June 22, 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Interventional studies with a comparison group reporting at least 1 outcome for: catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI), UTIs not identified as catheter-associated, bacteriuria, or urinary catheter use. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors abstracted study design, participant and intervention details, outcomes, and quality measures. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 5794 records retrieved, 20 records describing 19 interventions were included: 8 randomized controlled trials, 10 pre-post nonrandomized interventions, and 1 nonrandomized intervention with concurrent controls. Quality (range, 8-25; median, 15) and outcome definitions varied greatly. Thirteen studies employed strategies to reduce catheter use or improve catheter care; 9 studies employed general infection prevention strategies (eg, improving hand hygiene, surveillance, contact precautions, reducing antibiotics). The 19 studies reported 12 UTI outcomes, 9 CAUTI outcomes, 4 bacteriuria outcomes, and 5 catheter use outcomes. Five studies showed CAUTI reduction (1 significantly); 9 studies showed UTI reduction (none significantly); 2 studies showed bacteriuria reduction (none significantly). Four studies showed reduced catheter use (1 significantly). LIMITATIONS: Studies were often underpowered to assess statistical significance; none were pooled given variety of interventions and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Several practices, often implemented in bundles, such as improving hand hygiene, reducing and improving catheter use, managing incontinence without catheters, and enhanced barrier precautions, appear to reduce UTI or CAUTI in nursing home residents. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:356-368.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Homes for the Aged , Infection Control/methods , Nursing Homes , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/microbiology , Homes for the Aged/standards , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Nursing Homes/standards , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Urinary Catheterization/standards , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 162(9 Suppl): S1-34, 2015 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25938928

ABSTRACT

Interventions to reduce urinary catheter use involve lists of "appropriate" indications developed from limited evidence without substantial multidisciplinary input. Implementing these lists, however, is challenging given broad interpretation of indications, such as "critical illness." To refine criteria for appropriate catheter use-defined as use in which benefits outweigh risks-the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was applied. After reviewing the literature, a 15-member multidisciplinary panel of physicians, nurses, and specialists in infection prevention rated scenarios for catheter use as appropriate, inappropriate, or of uncertain appropriateness by using a standardized, multiround rating process. The appropriateness of Foley catheters, intermittent straight catheters (ISCs), and external condom catheters for hospitalized adults on medical services was assessed in 299 scenarios, including urinary retention, incontinence, wounds, urine volume measurement, urine sample collection, and comfort. The scenarios included patient-specific issues, such as difficulty turning and catheter placement challenges. The panel rated 105 Foley scenarios (43 appropriate, 48 inappropriate, 14 uncertain), 97 ISC scenarios (15 appropriate, 66 inappropriate, 16 uncertain), and 97 external catheter scenarios (30 appropriate, 51 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). The refined criteria clarify that Foley catheters are appropriate for measuring and collecting urine only when fluid status or urine cannot be assessed by other means; specify that patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) need specific medical indications for catheters because ICU location alone is not an appropriate indication; and recognize that Foley and external catheters may be pragmatically appropriate to manage urinary incontinence in select patients. These new appropriateness criteria can inform large-scale collaborative and bedside efforts to reduce inappropriate urinary catheter use.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Unnecessary Procedures , Urinary Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Catheters/statistics & numerical data , Catheters, Indwelling/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(3): 254-9, 2015 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25728151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endemic health care-associated safety problems, including health care-associated infection, account for substantial morbidity and mortality. We outline a regional No Preventable Harms campaign to reduce these safety problems and describe the initial results from the first initiative focusing on catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention. METHODS: We formed a think tank composed of multidisciplinary experts from within a 7-hospital Midwestern Veterans Affairs network to identify hospital-acquired conditions that had strong evidence on how to prevent the harm and outcome data that could be easily collected to evaluate improvement efforts. The first initiative of this campaign focused on CAUTI prevention. Quantitative data on CAUTI rates and qualitative data from site visit interviews were used to evaluate the initiative. RESULTS: Quantitative data showed a significant reduction in CAUTI rates per 1,000 catheter days for nonintensive care units across the region (2.4 preinitiative and 0.8 postinitiative; P = .001), but no improvement in the intensive care unit rate (1.4 preinitiative and 2.1 postinitiative; P = .16). Themes that emerged from our qualitative data highlight the need for considering local context and the importance of communication when developing and implementing regional initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: A regional collaborative can be a valuable strategy for addressing important endemic patient safety problems.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Patient Safety , Prevalence , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(5): 548-50, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24576604

ABSTRACT

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection, 1 of the hospital-acquired conditions targeted for reduction by the US government, is challenging to prevent. We therefore developed a self-assessment tool (a catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention guide to patient safety) based on extensive qualitative evaluations. We describe the rationale, features, and utility of such a quality improvement tool.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Patient Safety , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Risk Assessment , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...