Total radiation dose and overall treatment time are predictive for tumor sterilization in cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiation and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer involves multidisciplinary care using external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, brachytherapy, and surgery. We aimed to compare both tumor and treatment characteristics between patients with complete pathologic response (CR) and patients with residual disease (RD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This monocentric retrospective study included 40 consecutive patients, treated with external beam radiotherapy, pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy, and completion surgery. Treatment planning was performed to obtain a cumulative D90 value for the intermediate-risk clinical target volume (CTV) ≥60 Gy(α/ß=10). Different clinical and dosimetric parameters were analyzed and compared between patients with RD and those with CR. RESULTS: We observed 18 (45%) patients with CR and 22 (55%) patients with RD. In univariate analysis, patients with RD had a significantly longer overall treatment time than those with CR (59.5 vs. 53 days, p = 0.0321). The D90 value for the high-risk CTV (HR-CTV) was higher in the group with CR than in the group with RD (65.9 vs. 64.2 Gy(α/ß=10); p = 0.0439). In multivariate analysis, overall treatment time remained the only predictive factor for CR (p = 0.033), even if the difference for D90 HR-CTV kept a trend toward significance (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that tumor sterilization is significantly correlated with overall treatment time and probably with cumulative dose delivered to the HR-CTV. These results emphasize the attention that must be given to treatment organization and dosimetry optimization.

Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes.

AIMS: Although underestimated by interventional cardiologists for a long time, radiation exposure of operators and patients is currently a major concern. The objective of the present operator-blinded registry was to compare related-peripheral arterial route radiation exposure of operators. METHODS AND RESULTS: During 420 consecutive coronary angiograms (CAs) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), four interventional cardiologists were blindly screened. Radiation exposures were assessed using electronic personal dosimeters. Protection of operator was ensured using a lead apron, low leaded flaps, and leaded glass. Radiation exposure of operators was significantly higher using the radial route when compared with the femoral route for both CAs and CAs followed by ad hoc PCIs: 29.0 [1.0-195.0] microSv vs. 13.0 [1.0-164.0] microSv; P < 0.0001 and 69.5 [4.0-531.0] microSv vs. 41.0 [2.0-360.0] microSv; P = 0.018, respectively. Similarly, radiation exposure of patients was significantly higher using the radial route when compared with the femoral route for both CAs and CAs followed by ad hoc PCIs. Moreover, procedural durations and fluoroscopy times were significantly higher throughout the radial route. CONCLUSIONS: Although the radial route decreases peripheral arterial complication rates, increased radiation exposure of operators despite extensive use of specific protection devices is currently a growing problem for the interventional cardiologist health. Radial route indication should be promptly reconsidered in the light of the present findings.