Successful Opioid Minimization Following Kidney Transplant: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Opioid use after kidney transplant has been associated with an increased risk of death and graft loss. Several transplant centers have reported reductions in opioid use using multimodal analgesia and education. This study evaluated the impact of an opioid minimization protocol on inpatient opioid use and opioid prescribing on discharge. This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult kidney recipients transplanted from October 2021 to July 2022. Patients on chronic opioids prior to transplant were excluded. The protocol included an intra-operative ultrasound-guided lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with scheduled non-opioid analgesics and tramadol as needed. Acetaminophen 1000 mg and gabapentin 300 mg were given 1 hour prior to the procedure and continued three times daily after transplant. The gabapentin dose was reduced for patients with renal impairment. Additional analgesics including opioids could be added for uncontrolled pain. We hypothesized the protocol would decrease total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and opioid prescribing on discharge. Fifty-nine post-protocol patients were compared to 52 pre-protocol patients. After the protocol, there was a significant decrease in total inpatient MMEs per day administered and no patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) devices were required. In alignment with the protocol, there was a significant increase in the use of TAP blocks, acetaminophen, gabapentin, and lidocaine patches. While opioid use was lowest in post-protocol patients who received TAP blocks, significant reductions in MMEs per day were still seen in those post-protocol who did not receive TAP blocks. Opioid prescribing at the time of discharge decreased significantly after protocol. No difference was seen in patient-reported pain scores, return to operating room, readmission within 30 days, or length of stay. The use of scheduled acetaminophen and gabapentin with or without a TAP block allowed the elimination of PCA devices and led to significant minimizations in both inpatient opioid use and opioid prescribing on discharge.

Readmission After Pancreas Transplantation: Timing of Surgery Matters.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreas transplantation is associated with good long-term outcomes, but readmissions are frequent. In this study, our objective was to understand the effects of operation start time on postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent deceased donor pancreas transplant in a single center from January 2017 to December 2018. We compared postoperative outcomes of patients in relation to operation start time, which included morning (6 AM to 3 PM), afternoon (3 PM to 7 PM), and evening (7 PM to 6 AM). RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included in the study. The median age was 45 years old, 54.2% were males, and 79.5% had diabetes mellitus type 1. With regard to surgery start time, 50 patients (60.2%) had a start time in the morning, 25 patients (30.1%) in the afternoon, and 8 (9.6%) in the evening. Patients in the morning group had a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the afternoon and evening groups, respectively (50% vs 84% vs 87.5%; P = .04).There were no significant differences in reoperation rate (26% vs 32% vs 12.5%; P = .57), percutaneous drain placement (20% vs 12% vs 12.5%; P = .75), or graft failure (8% vs 4% vs 12.5%; P = .55) among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Morning operative start times were associated with lower readmission after pancreas transplant.

Is Prophylactic Drainage After Pancreas Transplant Associated With Reduced Reoperation Rate?

OBJECTIVES: Advances in surgery and perioperative care have contributed to improved outcomes after pancreas transplant. However, the development of peripancreatic infections carries a poor prognosis. It is not clear whether abdominal drainage is helpful in collection prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of adult consecutive pancreas transplants at a single institution between January 2017 and December 2018 was undertaken. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients in whom prophylactic intraoperative drains were placed and patients with no drains. RESULTS: We identified 83 patients who underwent pancreas transplant with a median age of 45 years; 54.2% were males, and median body mass index was 25.8. Thirty patients had 1 or 2 drains placed (36.1%). There was no difference in the readmission rate (70.0% vs 60.4%; P = .48), reoperation (20.0% vs 30.2%; P = .44), or percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic infections (20.0% vs 15.1%; P = .56) between patients with drains and no drains, respectively. However, prophylactic drainage was associated with a lower rate of reoperation for peripancreatic infections compared with those who were not drained (0.0% vs 13.2%; P < .05). No graft loss occurred in the drain group. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic drainage after pancreas transplant may be helpful for reduction in the infection rate after reoperation. The risks of drain placement should be weighed against those of drain avoidance.