Paediatric radiotherapy in the United Kingdom: an evolving subspecialty and a paradigm for integrated teamworking in oncology.

Many different malignancies occur in children, but overall, cancer in childhood is rare. Survival rates have improved appreciably and are higher compared with most adult tumour types. Treatment schedules evolve as a result of clinical trials and are typically complex and multi-modality, with radiotherapy an integral component of many. Risk stratification in paediatric oncology is increasingly refined, resulting in a more personalized use of radiation. Every available modality of radiation delivery: simple and advanced photon techniques, proton beam therapy, molecular radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, have their place in the treatment of children's cancers. Radiotherapy is rarely the sole treatment. As local therapy, it is often given before or after surgery, so the involvement of the surgeon is critically important, particularly when brachytherapy is used. Systemic treatment is the standard of care for most paediatric tumour types, concomitant administration of chemotherapy is typical, and immunotherapy has an increasing role. Delivery of radiotherapy is not done by clinical or radiation oncologists alone; play specialists and anaesthetists are required, together with mould room staff, to ensure compliance and immobilization. The support of clinical radiologists is needed to ensure the correct interpretation of imaging for target volume delineation. Physicists and dosimetrists ensure the optimal dose distribution, minimizing exposure of organs at risk. Paediatric oncology doctors, nurses, and a range of allied health professionals are needed for the holistic wrap-around care of the child and family. Radiographers are essential at every step of the way. With increasing complexity comes a need for greater centralization of services.

Impact of cyclic changes in pharmacokinetics and absorbed dose in pediatric neuroblastoma patients receiving [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE.

PURPOSE: Recent reports personalizing the administered activity (AA) of each cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy based on the predicted absorbed dose (AD) to the kidneys (dose-limiting organ) have been promising. Assuming identical renal pharmacokinetics for each cycle is pragmatic, however it may lead to over- or under-estimation of the optimal AA. Here, we investigate the influence that earlier cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE had on the biokinetics and AD of subsequent cycles in a recent clinical trial that evaluated the safety and activity of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in pediatric neuroblastoma (NBL). We investigated whether predictions based on an assumption of unchanging AD per unit AA (Gy/GBq) prove robust to cyclical changes in biokinetics. METHODS: A simulation study, based on dosimetry data from six children with NBL who received four-cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in the LuDO trial (ISRCTN98918118), was performed to explore the effect of variable biokinetics on AD. In the LuDO trial, AA was adapted to the patient's weight and SPECT/CT-based dosimetry was performed for the kidneys and tumour after each cycle. The largest tumour mass was selected for dosimetric analysis in each case. RESULTS: The median tumour AD per cycle was found to decrease from 15.6 Gy (range 8.12-26.4) in cycle 1 to 11.4 Gy (range 9.67-28.8), 11.3 Gy (range 2.73-32.9) and 4.3 Gy (range 0.72-20.1) in cycles 2, 3 and 4, respectively. By the fourth cycle, the median of the ratios of the delivered AD (ADD) and the predicted (or "expected") AD (ADE) (which was based on an assumption of stable biokinetics from the first cycle onwards) were 0.16 (range 0.02-0.92, p = 0.013) for the tumour and 1.08 (range 0.84-1.76, p > 0.05) for kidney. None of the patients had an objective response at 1 month follow up. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates variability in Gy/GBq and tumour AD per cycle in children receiving four administrations of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment for NBL. NBL is deemed a radiation sensitive tumour; therefore, dose-adaptive treatment planning schemes may be appropriate for some patients to compensate for decreasing tumour uptake as treatment progresses. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN98918118. Registered 20 December 2013 (retrospectively registered).

Localised rhabdomyosarcoma in infants (<12 months) and young children (12-36 months of age) treated on the EpSSG RMS 2005 study.

BACKGROUND: Infants (<12 months) with rhabdomyosarcoma have historically had poorer outcome than the older age groups. We present outcomes for infants and young children aged 12-36 months with localised rhabdomyosarcoma with a particular emphasis on infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All children less than 36 months of age enrolled on the EpSSG RMS 2005 study for localised disease are included. Treatment comprised chemotherapy, local surgery and/or radiation therapy adapted to risk group and age. Main outcome measures were event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 485/490 patients aged less than 36 months, 110 were infants. Infants received chemotherapy according to the risk group with no toxic deaths. Radiotherapy was delivered to 33.6% of infants and 63.5% of 12-36 months old, with respectively 41.7% and 22.2% receiving brachytherapy. Radical surgery was performed in 62% of infants and 57.1% of 12-36 months old. Median follow up for patients who are alive (n = 393) was 72.7 months (range 6.9-158.2). Five-year OS for infants was 88.4% (95%CI 80.3-93.2), which is significantly better than the OS in 12-36 months old patients of 78.0% (95%CI 73.2-82.0; p = 0.0204). Five-year EFS for infants was 72.5% (95%CI 62.8-80.0) compared with 66.1% (95%CI 61.0-70.7; p = 0.2663) for 12-36 months old. CONCLUSION: Infants treated on RMS 2005 achieved excellent EFS and OS. The EpSSG RMS 2005 chemotherapy regimen, combined with an increase in the application of adequate local therapy, improvements in imaging and supportive care and potentially favourable patients' characteristics may have contributed to these results.

Renal protection during 177lutetium DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy in children: a proposal for safe amino acid infusional volume during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues such as 177-lutetium DOTATATE is an effective treatment modality for neuroendocrine tumours, paragangliomas, and neuroblastomas. However, renal and haematopoietic toxicities are the major limitations of this therapeutic approach. The renal toxicity of PRRT is mediated by renal proximal tubular reabsorption and interstitial retention of the radiolabelled peptides resulting in excessive renal irradiation that can be dose-limiting. To protect the kidneys from PRRT-induced radiation nephropathy, basic amino acids are infused during PRRT as they competitively bind to the proximal tubular cells and prevent uptake of the radionuclide. In adults, 1 L of a basic amino acid solution consisting of arginine and lysine is infused over 4 h commencing 30 min prior to PRRT. However, this volume of amino acids infused over 4 h is excessive in small children and can result in hemodynamic overload. This is all the more relevant in paediatric oncology, as many of the children may have been heavily pretreated and so may have treatment-related renal and or cardiac impairment. We have therefore developed the following guidelines for safe paediatric dosing of renal protective amino acid infusions during PRRT. Our recommendations have been made taking into consideration the renal physiology in small children and the principles of safe fluid management in children.

The spleen as an organ at risk in paediatric radiotherapy: A SIOP-Europe Radiation Oncology Working Group report.

BACKGROUND: Radiation may cause long-term splenic dysfunction, risking potentially fatal late sepsis. We aimed to review this complication's magnitude in paediatric radiotherapy and gauge the level of awareness of the spleen as an organ at risk. METHODS: Clinical trial protocols and radiotherapy guidelines, patient/parent information sheets, and professional guidance documents were reviewed to assess the perceived risk of radiotherapy-related splenic dysfunction. Paediatric oncologists and paediatric radiation oncologists across Europe were surveyed to estimate the level of understanding of this risk and to ascertain current practice. Spleen doses received in practice were examined. A systematic review of relevant publications was undertaken. RESULTS: The risk is not mentioned in most clinical trials, patient information leaflets, or professional guidance documents. When mentioned, a threshold dose of 40 Gy is cited. The survey showed only limited awareness. More than half of patients assessed received spleen doses in excess of 10 Gy. The systematic review identified one paper reporting a relative mortality risk of 5.5 with spleen doses in the 10-20 Gy range. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of mortality from overwhelming infection is poorly recognised. We therefore recommend routine delineation of the spleen. Protocols and guidelines should give a spleen dose objective as low as reasonably achievable, ideally mean <10 Gy without compromise to target volumes. Revised evidence-based guidelines and continuing professional development activities should inform oncologists. Patient/parent information should mention the risk and the dose received be communicated to colleagues. Antibiotic prophylaxis and/or (re)vaccination should be considered if the mean spleen dose is ≥10 Gy.

Parents' responses to prognostic disclosure at diagnosis of a child with a high-risk brain tumor: Analysis of clinician-parent interactions and implications for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that parents of children with cancer desire more prognostic information than is often given even when prognosis is poor. We explored in audio-recorded consultations the kinds of information they seek. METHODS: Ethnographic study including observation and audio recording of consultations at diagnosis. Consultations were transcribed and analyzed using an interactionist perspective including tools drawn from conversation and discourse analysis. RESULTS: Enrolled 21 parents and 12 clinicians in 13 cases of children diagnosed with a high-risk brain tumor (HRBT) over 20 months at a tertiary pediatric oncology center. Clinicians presented prognostic information in all cases. Through their questions, parents revealed what further information they desired. Clinicians made clear that no one could be absolutely certain what the future held for an individual child. Explicit communication about prognosis did not satisfy parents' desire for information about their own child. Parents tried to personalize prognostic information and to apply it to their own situation. Parents moved beyond prognostic information presented and drew conclusions, which could change over time. Parents who were present in the same consultations could form different views of their child's prognosis. CONCLUSION: Population level prognostic information left parents uncertain about their child's future. The need parents revealed was not for more such information but rather how to use the information given and how to apply it to their child in the face of such uncertainty. Further research is needed on how best to help parents deal with uncertainty and make prognostic information actionable.

Personalisation of Molecular Radiotherapy through Optimisation of Theragnostics.

Molecular radiotherapy, or targeted radionuclide therapy, uses systemically administered drugs bearing a suitable radioactive isotope, typically a beta emitter. These are delivered via metabolic or other physiological pathways to cancer cells in greater concentrations than to normal tissues. The absorbed radiation dose in tumour deposits causes chromosomal damage and cell death. A partner radiopharmaceutical, most commonly the same vector labelled with a different radioactive atom, with emissions suitable for gamma camera or positron emission tomography imaging, is used to select patients for treatment and to assess response. The use of these pairs of radio-labelled drugs, one optimised for therapy, the other for diagnostic purposes, is referred to as theragnostics. Theragnostics is increasingly moving away from a fixed number of defined activity administrations, to a much more individualised or personalised approach, with the aim of improving treatment outcomes, and minimising toxicity. There is, however, still significant scope for further progress in that direction. The main tools for personalisation are the following: imaging biomarkers for better patient selection; predictive and post-therapy dosimetry to maximise the radiation dose to the tumour while keeping organs at risk within tolerance limits; imaging for assessment of treatment response; individualised decision making and communication about radiation protection, adjustments for toxicity, inpatient and outpatient care.

68Ga-DOTATATE and 123I-mIBG as imaging biomarkers of disease localisation in metastatic neuroblastoma: implications for molecular radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Iodine-131-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) and lutetium-177-labelled DOTATATE (Lu-DOTATATE) are used for molecular radiotherapy of metastatic neuroblastoma. These are taken up by the noradrenaline transporter (NAT) and the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR-2), respectively. Scintigraphy of iodine-123-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) and gallium-68 DOTATATE (Ga-DOTATATE) PET are used to select patients for therapy. These demonstrate the extent and location of tumour, and avidity of uptake by cells expressing NAT and SSTR-2, respectively. This study compared the similarities and differences in the anatomical distribution of these two imaging biomarkers in an unselected series of patients with metastatic neuroblastoma undergoing assessment for molecular radiotherapy. METHODS: Paired whole-body planar I-mIBG views and Ga-DOTATATE maximum intensity projection PET scans of metastatic neuroblastoma patients were visually compared. The disease extent was assessed by a semiquantitative scoring method. RESULTS: Paired scans from 42 patients were reviewed. Ga-DOTATATE scans were positive in all patients, I-mIBG scans were negative in two. In two patients, there was a mismatch, with some lesions identified only on the I-mIBG scan, and others visible only on the Ga-DOTATATE scan. CONCLUSION: Ga-DOTATATE and I-mIBG scans yield complementary information. For a more comprehensive assessment, consideration could be given to the use of both I-mIBG and Ga-DOTATATE imaging scans. Because of the heterogeneity of distribution of molecular targets revealed by these techniques, a combination of both I-mIBG and Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy may possibly be more effective than either alone.

A phase IIa trial of molecular radiotherapy with 177-lutetium DOTATATE in children with primary refractory or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: The objective of this phase IIa, open-label, single-centre, single-arm, two-stage clinical trial was to evaluate the safety and activity of 177-lutetium DOTATATE (LuDO) molecular radiotherapy in neuroblastoma. METHODS: Children with relapsed or refractory metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma were treated with up to four courses of LuDO. The administered activity was 75 to 100 MBq kg-1 per course, spaced at 8- to 12-week intervals. Outcomes were assessed by the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (primary outcome), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The trial recruited 21 patients; eight received the planned four courses. There was dose-limiting haematologic toxicity in one case, but no other significant haematologic or renal toxicities. None of 14 evaluable patients had an objective response at 1 month after completion of treatment (Wilson 90% CI 0.0, 0.16; and 95% CI is 0.0, 0.22). The trial did not therefore proceed to the second stage. The median PFS was 2.96 months (95% CI 1.71, 7.66), and the median OS was 13.0 months (95% CI 2.99, 21.52). CONCLUSION: In the absence of any objective responses, the use of LuDO as a single agent at the dose schedule used in this study is not recommended for the treatment of neuroblastoma. There are several reasons why this treatment schedule may not have resulted in objective responses, and as other studies do show benefit, the treatment should not be regarded as being of no value. Further trials designed to overcome this schedule's limitations are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98918118; URL: https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=98918118.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of molecular radiotherapy target expression in neuroblastoma tissue.

PURPOSE: Neuroblastoma may be treated with molecular radiotherapy, 131I meta-Iodobenzylguanidine and 177Lu Lutetium DOTATATE, directed at distinct molecular targets: Noradrenaline Transporter Molecule (NAT) and Somatostatin Receptor (SSTR2), respectively. This study used immunohistochemistry to evaluate target expression in archival neuroblastoma tissue, to determine whether it might facilitate clinical use of molecular radiotherapy. METHODS: Tissue bank samples of formalin fixed paraffin embedded neuroblastoma tissue from patients for whom clinical outcome data were available were sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and monoclonal antibodies directed against NAT and SSTR2. Sections were examined blinded to clinical information and scored for the percentage and intensity of tumour cells stained. These data were analysed in conjunction with clinical data. RESULTS: Tissue from 75 patients was examined. Target expression scores varied widely between patients: NAT median 45%, inter-quartile range 25% - 65%; and SSTR2 median 55%, interquartile range 30% - 80%; and in some cases heterogeneity of expression between different parts of a tumour was observed. A weak positive correlation was observed between the expression scores of the different targets: correlation coefficient = 0.23, p = 0.05. MYCN amplified tumours had lower SSTR2 scores: mean difference 23% confidence interval 8% - 39%, p < 0.01. Survival did not differ by scores. CONCLUSIONS: As expression of both targets is variable and heterogeneous, imaging assessment of both may yield more clinical information than either alone. The clinical value of immunohistochemical assessment of target expression requires prospective evaluation. Variable target expression within a patient may contribute to treatment failure.

Clinical outcomes following proton therapy for children with central nervous system tumors referred overseas.

BACKGROUND: International, multidisciplinary care of children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors presents unique challenges. The aim of this study is to report patient outcomes of U.K. children referred for proton therapy to a North American facility. METHODS: From 2008 to 2016, 166 U.K. children with approved CNS tumors were treated with proton therapy at a single academic medical center in the United States. Median age was 7 years (range, 1-19). Median follow-up was 2.6 years. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates were 96% and 91%, respectively, for the overall group, 92% and 85% for the ependymoma subgroup (n = 57), 95% and 88% for the low-grade glioma subgroup (n = 54), and 100% and 100%, respectively, for the craniopharyngioma subgroup (n = 45). Cyst expansion was observed in 13 patients, including one case resulting in visual impairment. Serious side effects included new-onset seizures in three patients (1.8%), symptomatic vasculopathy in three patients (1.8%), and symptomatic brainstem necrosis in one patient (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of British children referred overseas for proton therapy, disease control does not appear compromised, toxicity is acceptable, and improvement in long-term function is anticipated in survivors owing to the reduced brain exposure afforded by proton therapy.

Adverse events of local treatment in long-term head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma survivors after external beam radiotherapy or AMORE treatment.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is a well-known cause of adverse events (AEs). To reduce AEs, an innovative local treatment was developed in Amsterdam: Ablative surgery, MOuld brachytherapy and surgical REconstruction (AMORE). AIMS: (1) to determine the prevalence of AEs in HNRMS survivors and (2) to compare AEs between survivors treated with the international standard: external beam radiotherapy (EBRT-based: London) and survivors treated with AMORE if feasible, otherwise EBRT (AMORE-based: Amsterdam). METHODS: All HNRMS survivors, treated in London or Amsterdam between January 1990 and December 2010 (n = 153), and alive ⩾ 2 years post-treatment were eligible (n = 113). A predefined list of AEs was assessed in a multidisciplinary clinic and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Eighty HNRMS survivors attended the clinic (median follow-up 10.5 years); 63% experienced ⩾ 1 severe or disabling event, and 76% had ⩾ 5 AEs (any grade). Survivors with EBRT-based treatment were, after adjustment for site, age at diagnosis, and follow-up duration, at increased risk to develop any grade 3/4 event or ⩾ 5 AEs (any grade) compared with survivors with AMORE-based treatments (p = 0.032 and 0.01, respectively). Five year overall survival (source population) after EBRT-based treatment was 75.0%, after AMORE-based treatment 76.9%, p = 0.56. CONCLUSION: This study may serve as a baseline inventory and can be used in future studies for prospective assessments of AEs following the introduction of novel local treatment modalities. AMORE-based local treatment resulted in similar overall survival and a reduction of AEs secondary to local treatment.

A systematic review of 131I-meta iodobenzylguanidine molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma.

The optimal use and effectiveness of (131)I-meta iodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-mIBG) molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma remain unclear despite extensive clinical experience. This systematic review aimed to improve understanding of the current data and define uncertainties for future clinical trials. Bibliographic databases were searched for neuroblastoma and (131)I-mIBG. Clinical trials and non-comparative case series of (131)I-mIBG therapy for neuroblastoma were included. Two reviewers assessed papers for inclusion using the title and abstract with consensus achieved by discussion. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Studies with multiple publications were reported as a single study. The searches yielded 1216 citations, of which 51 publications reporting 30 studies met our inclusion criteria. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. In two studies (131)I-mIBG had been used as induction therapy and in one study it had been used as consolidation therapy. Twenty-seven studies for relapsed and refractory disease were identified. Publication dates ranged from 1987 to 2012. Total number of patients was 1121 with study sizes ranging from 10 to 164. There was a large amount of heterogeneity between the studies with regard to patient population, treatment schedule and response assessment. Study quality was highly variable. The objective tumour response rate reported in 25 studies ranged from 0% to 75%, mean 32%. We conclude that (131)I-mIBG is an active treatment for neuroblastoma, but its place in the management of neuroblastoma remains unclear. Prospective randomised trials are essential to strengthen the evidence base.

Intensity-modulated arc therapy to improve radiation dose delivery in the treatment of abdominal neuroblastoma.

The standard European radiotherapy technique for children with neuroblastoma is a conventional parallel opposed pair. This frequently results in compromise on planning target volume coverage to stay within normal tissue tolerances. This study investigates the use of an intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) technique to improve dose distribution and allow better protocol compliance. Among 20 previously treated patients, ten had received the full prescribed dose with conventional planning (protocol compliant) and ten had a compromise on planning target volume coverage (protocol noncompliant). All patients were replanned with IMAT. Dosimetric parameters of the conventional radiotherapy and IMAT were compared. The dose received by 98% of the planning target volume, homogeneity and conformity indices were all improved with IMAT (p < 0.001). IMAT would have enabled delivery of the full protocol dose in eight out of ten protocol-noncompliant patients. IMAT may improve outcomes through improved protocol compliance and better dose distributions.

Results of a quality assurance review of external beam radiation therapy in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (Europe) Neuroblastoma Group's High-risk Neuroblastoma Trial: a SIOPEN study.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy is important for local control in neuroblastoma. This study reviewed the compliance of plans with the radiation therapy guidelines of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (Europe) Neuroblastoma Group (SIOPEN) High-Risk Trial protocol. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The SIOPEN trial central electronic database has sections to record diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy planning data. Individual centers may upload data remotely, but not all centers involved in the trial chose to use this system. A quality scoring system was devised based on how well the radiation therapy plan matched the protocol guidelines, to what extent deviations were justified, and whether adverse effects may result. Central review of radiation therapy planning was undertaken retrospectively in 100 patients for whom complete diagnostic and treatment sets were available. Data were reviewed and compared against protocol guidelines by an international team of radiation oncologists and radiologists. For each patient in the sample, the central review team assigned a quality assurance score. RESULTS: It was found that in 48% of patients there was full compliance with protocol requirements. In 29%, there were deviations for justifiable reasons with no likely long-term adverse effects resulting. In 5%, deviations had occurred for justifiable reasons, but that might result in adverse effects. In 1%, there was a deviation with no discernible justification, which would not lead to long-term adverse events. In 17%, unjustified deviations were noted, with a risk of an adverse outcome resulting. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to concern over the proportion of patients in whom unjustified deviations were observed, a protocol amendment has been issued. This offers the opportunity for central review of radiation therapy plans before the start of treatment and the treating clinician a chance to modify plans.

177Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy for childhood neuroblastoma.

UNLABELLED: This study tested the principle that (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may be used to select children with primary refractory or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma for treatment with (177)Lu-DOTATATE and evaluated whether this is a viable therapeutic option for those children. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2010, 8 children with relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma were studied with (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The criterion of eligibility for (177)Lu-DOTATATE therapy was uptake on the diagnostic scan equal to or higher than that of the liver. RESULTS: Of the 8 children imaged, 6 had abnormally high uptake on the (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan and proceeded to treatment. Patients received 2 or 3 administrations of (177)Lu-DOTATATE at a median interval of 9 wk and a median administered activity of 7.3 GBq. Of the 6 children treated, 5 had stable disease by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Of these 5 children, 2 had an initial metabolic response and reduction in the size of their lesions, and 1 patient had a persistent partial metabolic response and reduction in size of the lesions on CT, although the disease was stable by RECIST. One had progressive disease. Three children had grade 3 and 1 child had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. No significant renal toxicity has been seen. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTATATE can be used to image children with neuroblastoma and identify those suitable for molecular radiotherapy with (177)Lu-DOTATATE. We have shown, for what is to our knowledge the first time, that treatment with (177)Lu-DOTATATE is safe and feasible in children with relapsed or primary refractory high-risk neuroblastoma. We plan to evaluate this approach formally in a phase I-II clinical trial.