ABSTRACT
The purpose of the present study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare the efficacy of demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and bovine derived xenogenic bone graft (BDX) [Bio-Oss] with amniotic membrane (AM) as guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of human periodontal Grade II buccal furcation defects. Ten patients suffering from chronic periodontitis, displaying bilateral Grade II buccal furcation defect, were randomly treated using DFDBA with AM (Experimental site A) or using bovine derived xenograft (BDX) with AM (Experimental site B). The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 6 and 9 months. Healing was uneventful in all patients except one site which was treated with BDX + AM. At 9 months after therapy, soft tissue measurements for the DFDBA + AM group showed pocket depth (PD) reduction of 4.7 mm +/- 0.58, and relative attachment level gain of 4.8 mm + 0.32, while the BDX + AM group showed a PD reduction of 4.4 mm +/- 0.27, and AL gain of 5.1 mm +/- 0.09. Osseous measurements showed bone fill of 2.1 mm +/- 0.36 for the DFDBA + AM group and 2.43 mm +/- 0.38 for the BDX + AM group. Percentage gain in bone was 76.3% for the DFDBA + AM group and 79.6% for the BDX + AM group. Statistical analysis revealed there was no statistical difference between the two materials in all measurements. Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that: (1) at 9 months after surgery both therapies resulted in significant PD reductions and CAL gains and (2) significant improvement was seen in bone fill and percentage gain with both the material, however, there was no significant difference between both.
Subject(s)
Amnion/transplantation , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Furcation Defects/surgery , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Minerals/therapeutic use , Transplantation, Heterologous , Transplantation, Homologous , Adult , Animals , Bone Transplantation/methods , Cattle , Female , Furcation Defects/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RadiologyABSTRACT
In India, the procurement of tissues for transplantation is governed by the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994. However, although this law exists, it is primarily applied to organ transplantation and rules and regulations that are specific to tissue banking have yet to be developed.The Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH) Tissue Bank was started in 1988 as part of an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) programme to promote the use of ionising radiation for the sterilisation of biological tissues. It represents the Government of India within this project and was the first such facility in the country. It is registered with the Health Services Maharashtra State and provides lyophilised amnion, dura mater, skin and bone that have been terminally sterilised with exposure to 25 kGy of gamma radiation from a Cobalt 60 source. These are obtained either from cadavers or live donors.To date the TMH Tissue Bank has provided 6328 allografts for use as biological dressings or in various reconstructive procedures.The TMH Tissue Bank has helped initiate a Tissue Bank at the Defence Laboratory (DL), Jodhpur. At present these are the only two Banks in the country using radiation for terminal sterilisation of banked tissues.The availability of safe, clinically useful and cost effective grafts have resulted in changes in surgical treatment with a concomitant increase in demand for grafts and an interest in developing more tissue banks. The availability of donor tissue however, continues to be a major limitation.
