Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 37(9): 657-63, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16126566

ABSTRACT

The objective was to evaluate the utility of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) developed by Fine et al. as a tool to streamline diagnostic and therapeutic effort. Site of care of patients was recommended in accordance with the PSI class: classes I and II underwent treatment at home and classes III, IV, and V were hospitalized. Class I comprised 37 patients; class II had 30, class III had 20, class IV had 31, and class V had 10 patients. 80 patients were admitted into the hospital, 3 of whom required admittance to the intensive care unit, and 48 were managed as outpatients from the emergency room. Overall mortality was 4 patients (3.1%). Of these, 3 belonged to class IV and 1 to class V. The aetiological diagnosis was obtained in 53.9% of the cases (69/128). If classes I to III are analysed together, the percentage of aetiological diagnoses was 47% (41/87), increasing to 68% (28/41) for patients in classes IV and V. In our experience Fine's PSI classification, with rationalization and adaptation to the particularities of each centre, is an effective tool for deciding on hospitalization for selecting the most suitable battery of diagnostic tests based on cost-benefit criteria. However, it is inadequate for young patients with hypoxia or pleural effusion. Therefore, although hospitalization of patients with pneumonia should be mainly based on clinical criteria, Fine's PSI classification could help physicians in making more rational decisions in this respect.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Hospitalization , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/microbiology
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 22(11): 963-8, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14614368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lower respiratory tract infection is the most common infection leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment in children. Etiologic diagnosis is not immediately achieved, and the pathogen remains unidentified in a large number of cases. Neither clinical nor laboratory factors allow for a rapid distinction between bacterial and viral etiology. The aim of our study was to evaluate the reliability of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count in distinguishing pneumococcal, atypical and viral lower respiratory tract infection. METHODS: PCT, CRP and leukocyte count were measured in children with microbiologically documented diagnoses of lower respiratory tract infection. The results were compared of children with pneumococcal, atypical and viral etiologies. RESULTS: PCT and CRP showed significant correlation with a bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection. No significance was found for leukocyte count. Using a cutoff point of 2 ng/ml for PCT and 65 mg/l for CRP, the sensitivities and specificities for distinguishing bacterial from viral lower respiratory tract infections were 68.6 and 79.4% for PCT and 79.1 and 67.1% for CRP. The sensitivities and specificities for distinguishing pneumococcal from other etiologies were 90.3 and 74.1% for PCT and 90.3 and 60% for CRP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High PCT and CRP values show a significant correlation with the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection. PCT and CRP show good sensitivity for distinguishing pneumococcal from other etiologies. PCT shows higher specificity than CRP. PCT and CRP can help make decisions about antibiotic therapy in children with lower respiratory tract infections.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Calcitonin/analysis , Leukocyte Count , Protein Precursors/analysis , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Biomarkers/analysis , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Respiratory Tract Infections/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics, Nonparametric
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(7): 2867-71, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12843014

ABSTRACT

A new mycobacteriophage-based technique (PhageTek MB) was compared with standard culture and staining techniques for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. A total of 2,048 respiratory specimens from 1,466 patients collected from February 2000 to March 2001 were studied by both (i) conventional methods (direct microscopic examination [auramine-rhodamine fluorochrome], and culture in BacT/ALERT 3D and solid media) and (ii) the PhageTek MB assay. This phenotypic test utilizes specific mycobacteriophages to detect the presence of live Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms within a decontaminated clinical sample. Overall, 205 (10%) specimens were positive for mycobacteria (134 patients): 144 (70.2%) M. tuberculosis isolates and 61 (29.8%) nontuberculous mycobacterium isolates (30 Mycobacterium kansasii, 12 Mycobacterium xenopi, 9 Mycobacterium gordonae, 7 Mycobacterium avium complex, 2 Mycobacterium chelonae, and 1 Mycobacterium fortuitum isolate). PhageTek MB was more likely to give a positive result with specimens in which high numbers of acid-fast bacilli were observed on the smear. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of this mycobacteriophage-based technique versus culture for M. tuberculosis were 58.3, 99.1, 83.2, and 96.9%, respectively. PhageTek MB is a rapid (48-h), specific, safe, and easy-to-perform test. According to the prevalence of the disease in the population studied, the test would require improved sensitivity in order to be used as a screening test for routine diagnosis of respiratory tuberculosis in our setting.


Subject(s)
Mycobacteriophages/growth & development , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Colony Count, Microbial , Culture Media , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/growth & development , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/virology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/microbiology , Viral Plaque Assay
4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 22(5): 438-42, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12792386

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) in young children carries the risk of parenchymal damage and sequelae. The location of the infection within the urinary tract influences decisions regarding both therapeutics and follow-up. Because clinical features and laboratory markers of infection at an early age are not specific, it is difficult to make a distinction between lower UTI and acute pyelonephritis. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been studied as a marker of severe bacterial infection. The aim of this study was to test the usefulness of PCT concentration in serum to distinguish between uncomplicated UTI and severe acute pyelonephritis with renal scars. METHODS: PCT was measured by immunoluminometric assay in serum samples from children with microbiologically documented infection. Severe renal involvement was assessed by 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid gammagraphy done 5 to 6 months after the episode to check for the presence of parenchymal scars. C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count were also measured. RESULTS: PCT at presentation showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001) with the presence of renal scars in children with UTI. Using a cutoff of 1 ng/ml for PCT and 20 mg/l for CRP, sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between urinary tract infection with and without renal damage were 92.3 and 61.9%, respectively, for PCT and 92.3 and 34.4% for CRP. Positive and negative predictive values were 32 and 97.5%, respectively, for PCT and 23 and 95%, respectively, for CRP. CONCLUSIONS: A low PCT value at admission indicates a low risk of long term renal scarring. Increased PCT values at admission correlate with the presence of scars. PCT values have proved to be more specific than CRP and leukocyte count for identifying patients who might develop renal damage.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Calcitonin/blood , Cicatrix/pathology , Kidney/pathology , Protein Precursors/blood , Pyelonephritis/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Calcitonin/analysis , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Probability , Protein Precursors/analysis , Pyelonephritis/epidemiology , ROC Curve , Radioimmunoassay , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...