Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty approximates healthy knee kinematics more closely than total knee arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are effective surgeries to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Clinicians assume that TKA alters knee kinematics while UKA preserves native knee kinematics; however, few studies of in vivo kinematics have evaluated this assumption. This study used biplane radiography to compare side-to-side tibiofemoral kinematics during chair rise, stair ascent, and walking in 16 patients who received either TKA or UKA. We hypothesized that TKA knees would have significant kinematic changes and increased asymmetry with the contralateral knee, while UKA knee kinematics would not change after surgery and preoperative knee symmetry would be maintained. Native bone and implant motion were tracked using a volumetric model-based tracking technique. Six degrees of freedom kinematics were calculated throughout each motion. Kinematics were compared between the operated and contralateral knees pre- and post-surgery using a linear mixed-effects model. TKA knees became less varus with the tibia more medial, posterior, and distal relative to the femur. UKA knees became less varus with the tibia less lateral on average. Postoperative TKA knees were in less varus than UKA knees on average and at low flexion angles, with an internally rotated tibia during chair rise and stair ascent. At high flexion angles, the tibia was more medial and posterior after TKA than UKA. Side-to-side kinematic symmetry worsened after TKA but was maintained or improved after UKA. Greater understanding of kinematic differences between operated and contralateral knees after surgery may help surgeons understand why some patients remain unsatisfied with their new knees.

Improved joint function when reaching behind the back is associated with patient reported outcomes in individuals with rotator cuff tears following exercise therapy.

BACKGROUND: Reaching behind the back is painful for individuals with rotator cuff tears. The objectives of the study were to determine changes in glenohumeral kinematics when reaching behind the back, passive range of motion (RoM), patient reported outcomes and the relationships between kinematics and patient reported outcomes following exercise therapy. METHODS: Eighty-four individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were recruited for this prospective observational study. Glenohumeral kinematics were measured using biplane radiography during a reaching behind the back movement. Passive glenohumeral internal rotation and patient reported outcome measures were collected. Depending on data normality, appropriate tests were utilized to determine changes in variables. Spearman's correlations were utilized for associations, and Stuart-Maxwell tests for changes in distributions. FINDINGS: Maximum active glenohumeral internal rotation increased by 3.2° (P = 0.001), contact path length decreased by 5.5% glenoid size (P = 0.022), passive glenohumeral internal rotation RoM increased by 4.9° (P = 0.001), and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores increased by 29.8 and 21.1 (P = 0.001), respectively. Changes in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index scores positively associated with changes in maximum active glenohumeral internal rotation and negatively associated with changes in contact path lengths (P = 0.008 and P = 0.006, respectively). INTERPRETATION: The reaching behind the back movement was useful in elucidating in-vivo mechanistic changes associated with patient reported outcomes. Glenohumeral joint function and patient reported outcomes improved, where changes in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index scores were associated with kinematics. These findings inform clinicians of functional changes following exercise therapy and new targetable treatment factors.

Validation of dynamic biplane radiography and three-dimensional model-based tracking for evaluation of dynamic thumb kinematics.

Dynamic biplane radiography (DBR) in conjunction with model-based tracking (MBT) has provided a suitable mechanism for biomechanical assessment of many joints but has not yet achieved widespread use at the thumb and wrist. The purpose of this work is to determine the accuracy of DBR with markerless MBT for the evaluation of thumb and wrist joint kinematics. Three 0.6 mm stainless steel beads were implanted into each trapezium, scaphoid, first metacarpal, and radius of three cadaveric upper extremities. Each specimen was manipulated in thumb abduction/adduction, thumb flexion/extension, wrist radioulnar deviation, and wrist flexion/extension while synchronized biplane radiographs were collected at 100 Hz. Specimen-specific 3D bone models were created from CT scans. MBT was performed by optimizing the correlation between digitally reconstructed radiographs, created from the volumetric CT-based bone models, and the biplane radiographs. Joint kinematics and joint space were calculated and compared between the "gold standard" bead-based tracking and markerless MBT. The MBT system accuracy (RMS error) in measuring bone position for the static and dynamic trials was 0.25 mm and 0.58 mm, respectively. The overall MBT system accuracy in measuring dynamic joint kinematics was 1.3 mm in translation and 5.0° in rotation. The MBT system accuracy in measuring dynamic joint space was 0.4 mm. DBR with MBT is a non-invasive and accurate method that can be utilized for kinematic analysis of the thumb and wrist.