Familial combined hyperlipoproteinemia: experts panel position on diagnostic criteria for clinical practice. Committee of experts of the Atherosclerosis and Dysmetabolic Disorders Study Group.

The Atherosclerosis and Dysmetabolic Disorders Study Group, headed by Prof. Rodolfo Paoletti, decided in 1994 to compose a committee of experts to formulate a clear description of familial combined hyperlipoproteinemia (FCH), a disorder illustrated in the literature, but still unknown to most physicians in spite of its severity and relative diffusion. The Committee consists of experts from the Lipid Clinics of the Universities of Ancona, Bari, Bologna, Ferrara, Genoa, Milan, Naples, Padua, Palermo, Perugia, Rome, Sassari, Turin, Verona and Venice. It has held several meetings coordinated by the national secretary at the "Giancarlo Descovich" Atherosclerosis Centre of the University of Bologna. This paper summarizes its conclusions.

Meta-analysis of some results of clinical trials on sulodexide therapy in peripheral occlusive arterial disease.

The aim was to look at the effect of sulodexide in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease (POAD), by verifying, through meta-analysis of Italian data, if the drug affects the clinical course of claudication or the main risk factors for POAD. Sulodexide increases the pain-free walking distance (benefit 36% vs controls, P < 0.001). The meta-analysis confirmed the effectiveness of sulodexide in improving claudication (lower limit of the 95% CI for overall odds ratio always > 1). There was a marked effect in lowering triglycerides (overall -28%, P = 0.0015), fibrinogen (-13%, P < 0.0001) and plasma and serum viscosities, and in increasing high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (24.4%, P = 0.0007). The medium-term administration of sulodexide has a therapeutic effect on claudication of diabetic and/or hyperlipidaemic patients suffering from POAD stages- and also counteracts several POAD risk factors. Long-term use of sulodexide appears to be well tolerated. The treatment has a low daily cost; therefore, it has a favourable cost-benefit ratio, in view of the high general costs associated with global POAD care, particularly in diabetic patients.