REPeated mAgnetic resonance Image-guided stereotactic body Radiotherapy (MRIg-reSBRT) for oligometastatic patients: REPAIR, a mono-institutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Oligo-progression or further recurrence is an open issue in the multi-integrated management of oligometastatic disease (OMD). Re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (re-SBRT) technique could represent a valuable treatment option to improve OMD clinical outcomes. MRI-guided allows real-time visualization of the target volumes and online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of MRI-guided repeated SBRT (MRIg-reSBRT) in the OMD setting and propose a re-SBRT classification. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients (pts) with recurrent liver metastases or abdominal metastatic lesions between 1 and 5 centimeters from liver candidate to MRIg-reSBRT showing geometric overlap between the different SBRT courses and assessing whether they were in field (type 1) or not (type 2). RESULTS: Eighteen pts completed MRIg-reSBRT course for 25 metastatic hepatic/perihepatic lesions from July 2019 to January 2020. A total of 20 SBRT courses: 15 Type 1 re-SBRT (75%) and 5 Type 2 re-SBRT (25%) was delivered. Mean interval between the first SBRT and MRIg-reSBRT was 8,6 months. Mean prescribed dose for the first treatment was 43 Gy (range 24-50 Gy, mean BEDα/ß10=93), while 41 Gy (range 16-50 Gy, mean BEDα/ß10=92) for MRIg-reSBRT. Average liver dose was 3,9 Gy (range 1-10 Gy) and 3,7 Gy (range 1,6-8 Gy) for the first SBRT and MRIg-reSBRT, respectively. No acute or late toxicities were reported at a median follow-up of 10,7 months. The 1-year OS and PFS was 73,08% and 50%, respectively. Overall Clinical Benefit was 54%. CONCLUSIONS: MRIg-reSBRT could be considered an effective and safe option in the multi-integrated treatment of OMD.

Impact of data transfer between treatment planning systems on dosimetric parameters.

PURPOSE: In radiotherapy it is often necessary to transfer a patient's DICOM (Digital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine) dataset from one system to another for re-treatment, plan-summation or registration purposes. The aim of the study is to evaluate effects of dataset transfer between treatment planning systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients treated in a 0.35T MR-Linac (MRidian, ViewRay) for locally-advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. For each patient, a nominal dose distribution was optimized on the planning MRI. Each plan was daily re-optimized if needed to match the anatomy and exported from MRIdian-TPS (ViewRay Inc.) to Eclipse-TPS (Siemens-Varian). A comparison between the two TPSs was performed considering the PTV and OARs volumes (cc), as well as dose coverages and clinical constraints. RESULTS: From the twenty-five enrolled patients, 139 plans were included in the data comparison. The median values of percentage PTV volume variation are 10.8 % for each fraction, while percentage differences of PTV coverage have a mean value of -1.4 %. The median values of the percentage OARs volume variation are 16.0 %, 7.0 %, 10.4 % and 8.5 % for duodenum, stomach, small and large bowel, respectively. The percentage variations of the dose constraints are 41.0 %, 52.7 % and 49.8 % for duodenum, stomach and small bowel, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a non-negligible variation in size and dosimetric parameters when datasets are transferred between TPSs. Such variations should be clinically considered. Investigations are focused on DICOM structure algorithm employed by the TPSs during the transfer to understand the cause of such variations.

Motion and dosimetric criteria for selecting gating technique for apical lung lesions in magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy.

Introduction: Patients treatment compliance increases during free-breathing (FB) treatment, taking generally less time and fatigue with respect to deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). This study quantifies the gross target volume (GTV) motion on cine-MRI of apical lung lesions undergoing a SBRT in a MR-Linac and supports the patient specific treatment gating pre-selection. Material and methods: A total of 12 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. During simulation and treatment fractions, sagittal 0.35 T cine-MRI allows real-time GTV motion tracking. Cine-MRI has been exported, and an in-house developed MATLAB script performed image segmentation for measuring GTV centroid position on cine-MRI frames. Motion measurements were performed during the deep inspiration phase of DIBH patient and during all the session for FB patient. Treatment plans of FB patients were reoptimized using the same cost function, choosing the 3 mm GTV-PTV margin used for DIBH patients instead of the original 5 mm margin, comparing GTV and OARs DVH for the different TP. Results: GTV centroid motion is <2.2 mm in the antero-posterior and cranio-caudal direction in DIBH. For FB patients, GTV motion is lower than 1.7 mm, and motion during the treatment was always in agreement with the one measured during the simulation. No differences have been observed in GTV coverage between the TP with 3-mm and 5-mm margins. Using a 3-mm margin, the mean reduction in the chest wall and trachea-bronchus Dmax was 2.5 Gy and 3.0 Gy, respectively, and a reduction of 1.0 Gy, 0.6 Gy, and 2.3% in Dmax, Dmean, and V5Gy, respectively, of the homolateral lung and 1.7 Gy in the contralateral lung Dmax. Discussions: Cine-MRI allows to select FB lung patients when GTV motion is <2 mm. The use of narrower PTV margins reduces OARs dose and maintains target coverage.

Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation.

Introduction: Contouring of gas pockets is a time consuming step in the workflow of adaptive radiotherapy. We would like to better understand which gas pockets electronic densitiy should be used and the dosimetric impact on adaptive MRgRT treatment. Materials and methods: 21 CT scans of patients undergoing SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Anatomical structures were contoured: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV), stomach (ST), small bowel (SB), large bowel (LB), gas pockets (GAS) and gas in each organ respectively STG, SBG, LBG. Average HU in GAS was converted in RED, the obtained value has been named as Gastrointestinal Gas RED (GIGED). Differences of average HU in GAS, STG, SBG and LBG were computed. Three treatment plans were calculated editing the GAS volume RED that was overwritten with: air RED (0.0012), water RED (1.000), GIGED, generating respectively APLAN, WPLAN and the GPLAN. 2-D dose distributions were analyzed by gamma analysis. Parameter called active gas volume (AGV) was calculated as the intersection of GAS with the isodose of 5% of prescription dose. Results: Average HU value contained in GAS results to be equal to -620. No significative difference was noted between the average HU of gas in different organ at risk. Value of Gamma Passing Rate (GPR) anticorrelates with the AGV for each plan comparison and the threshold value for GPR to fall below 90% is 41, 60 and 139 cc for WPLANvsAPLAN, GPLANvsAPLAN and WPLANvsGPLAN respectively. Discussions: GIGED is the right RED for Gastrointestinal Gas. Novel AGV is a useful parameter to evaluate the effect of gas pocket on dose distribution.

Mesorectal motion evaluation in rectal cancer MR-guided radiotherapy: an exploratory study to quantify treatment margins.

BACKGROUND: Mesorectal motion (MM) is a source of uncertainty during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) delivery for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Previously published experiences using cone-beam computed tomography imaging have already described significant movement. Aim of this analysis is to assess inter-fraction MM using the higher tissue contrast provided by hybrid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in LARC patients (pts) treated with MRI guided radiation therapy (MRgRT). METHODS: The total mesorectum, its superior (Msup), middle (Mmid) and lower (Mlow) regions were contoured on the positioning MRIs acquired on simulation day and on each treatment day. Six PTVs were obtained adding 0.5, 0.7, 1, 1.3, 1.5 and 2 cm margin to the whole mesorectum, starting from the simulation MRI. Margins including 95% of the mesorectal structures during whole treatment in 95% of patients (pts) were considered adequate. RESULTS: A total number of 312 fractions of 12 consecutive pts was retrospectively analyzed. The different mesorectum regions show specific motion variability. In particular, Msup shows larger variability in left, right and anterior directions, while the Mlow in caudal and posterior ones. The anterior margin is significantly larger in the Msup than in the other regions. CONCLUSION: Different mesorectal regions move differently throughout the radiotherapy treatment, with the largest MM in the Msup anterior direction. Asymmetrical margins are recommended.