Diagnostic dilemma of papilledema and pseudopapilledema.

BACKGROUND: Papilledema is the optic disc swelling caused by increased intracranial pressure (ICP) that can damage the optic nerve and cause subsequent vision loss. Pseudopapilledema refers to optic disc elevation without peripapillary fluid that can arise from several optic disc disorders, with optic disc drusen (ODD) being the most frequent cause. Occasionally, pseudopapilledema patients are mistakenly diagnosed as papilledema, leading to the possibility of unneeded procedures. We aim to thoroughly examine the most current evidence on papilledema and pseudopapilledema causes and several methods for distinguishing between both conditions. METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted on electronic databases including PubMed and google scholar using keywords that were relevant to the assessed pathologies. Data were collected and then summarized in comprehensive form. RESULTS: Various techniques are employed to distinguish between papilledema and pseudopapilledema. These techniques include Fundus fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Lumbar puncture and other invasive procedures may be needed if results are suspicious. CONCLUSION: Papilledema is a sight-threatening condition that may lead to visual affection. Many disc conditions may mimic papilledema. Accordingly, differentiation between papilledema and pseudopailledema is crucial and can be conducted through many modalities.

Comparison between long and lower medial head triceps branches in dual neurotization for shoulder function restoration in upper brachial plexus palsy.

PURPOSE: In upper brachial plexus injury (UBPI), restoring shoulder function is crucial. This study compares the transfer of long and lower medial heads of triceps branches to the axillary nerve to achieve proper restoration of function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted between two groups of patients with (UBPI). Group I patients (10) [mean age: 19 ± 10.6 years] were managed by transferring triceps long head branch to axillary nerve while group II patients (8) [mean age: 26 ± 9.6 years] were managed by triceps lower medial head branch transfer. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6 ± 1.3 and 5 ± 1.7 months respectively. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months with the assessment of VAS, DASH score, active range of motion (AROM) and strength of shoulder abduction and external rotation; in addition to shoulder endurance and strengths of donors. Postoperative, three-monthly, electrodiagnostic assessments were performed. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the mean VAS and DASH scores; in addition to endurance time, showed significant enhancement in both groups. Patients in both groups have accomplished a mean abduction (AROM) of 98° ± 27.9 and 97° ± 11.9 respectively. The mean external rotation (AROM) was 48° ± 18.4 and 47° ± 9.2 respectively. Furthermore, group II patients had less triceps morbidity in addition to earlier and enhanced electrophysiological recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Dual neurotization for shoulder function restoration in (UBPI) is capable of providing proper functional results with minimal donor morbidity. The triceps lower medial branch provides an excelling donor due to less triceps morbidity, extra length; yet, earlier and enhanced electrophysiological recovery.

Surgical outcomes and predictors of complication in elderly patients with meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of symptomatic meningioma in elderly is still a high-risk surgery due to increased incidence of complication rate. Many scoring systems have been proposed to expect the surgical risk and the outcome.The study tries to assess cranial meningioma surgery in elderly using the Ibañez grade for complication rate and the Geriatric Scoring System (GSS) for the surgical outcome (GSS). METHODS: A clinical and radiological data were studied retrospectively in 42 patients with a primary intracranial meningioma at or above the age of 65. Complication rate, surgical risk, and outcome were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean Geriatric Scoring System (GSS) score on admission was 15.4 ± 2.6. Ibañez grade of severe complication or death (grades III-IV) were experienced in 26.2% of patients. It was more common in male and in emergency cases, but it was significant in relation to the comorbidities (P < 0.004). Most patients had World Health Organization (WHO) grades I lesions, accounted for 85.7% of patients. MRI evidence of post-surgical residual was 14.4%, and 83.3% of patients had recurrence-free survival (RFS). The GSS score >16 were more frequent in the patient with RFS than those of < 16, and it was statistically significant (P < 0.06). Patient with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) < 70, the mean GSS was 14.5 and KPS > 70, the mean GSS was 18.9, and it was statistically significant (P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: The surgical technique for resection of elderly meningioma still had numbered cases of morbidity and mortality. The complication rate is related to preoperative co-morbidity and frequently associated with male and urgent surgery. Karnofsky score > 70, and RFS are favorable prognosis and related to GSS > 16 scores. The recurrence rate is usually attributed to high tumor grade and skull base tumor. Such scoring systems are valuable for elderly meningioma.

Decompressive Craniotomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Optimal Timing and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of early or delayed decompressive craniotomy for patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was carried out of a series of 46 consecutive patients with malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction. Patients were divided randomly into 2 groups: group I, 27 patients who were followed until obvious deterioration of level of consciousness; group II, 19 patients who were operated on prophylactically in 6 hours of presentation even with no clear deterioration of level of consciousness or radiologic findings. Patients were assessed clinically using the Glasgow Coma Scale, motor power by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council, and functionally by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale. Radiologically, patients had primary magnetic resonance imaging on admission, followed by computed tomography scan. Infarction behavior including volume of infarct area, midline shift, and secondary hemorrhage were calculated. RESULTS: At final follow-up, both groups showed good improvement in level of consciousness, motor power, and functional outcome; however, statistically significant neurologic improvement was shown in group II. Functional outcome also showed statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in this ultraearly decompression group (group II). There was a significant difference in mortality in both groups; more than half (52%) of group I died as a result of delay in surgery or its other consequences. Another significant difference was in the progression of infarction volume, which was observed more in group I (statistically insignificant). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possible complications from surgery, early decompressive craniotomy (within 6 hours of ictus without waiting for neurologic deterioration) has a significant impact on prognosis. Delay in transferring the patient, diagnosing the condition, or taking the decision of surgery significantly affects mortality and overall outcome.

Efficacy of therapeutic fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine interventional procedures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefit of fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine interventional procedures in treatment of low back pain. METHODS: This prospective descriptive study was performed on 60 patients with back/radicular pain after showing no improvement with conservative treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and two injection sessions were done (average 1.7 injection per patient). Caudal and lumbar transforaminal injections were effective in 55.9% and 78.5%, respectively. Facet and sacroiliac interventions were effective in 28.3% and 10%, respectively. Complications occurred in 20% of the procedures. CONCLUSION: Lumbar injections improved pain/disability related to discogenic lumbar spinal diseases. Efficacy of facet and sacroiliac injections is limited.