Diagnosis of subtle syndesmotic instability using conventional CT-imaging and axial force in different foot positions.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no available method that can objectively and reliably detect subtle instability of the distal tibiofibular joint. The purpose of this study is to diagnose, using computerized axial tomography and an adjustable simulated loading device, subtle instability of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. METHODS: Fifteen healthy individuals and 15 patients with clinical suspicion of subtle instability of the tibiofibular syndesmosis (total 60 ankles) were studied using an adjustable simulated loading device (ASLD). This device allows to perform bilateral ankle CT scans in two forced foot and ankle positions (30° of plantar flexion, 15° of inversion, 20° of internal rotation and 15° of dorsal flexion, 15° of eversion, 30° of external rotation). Axial load was applied simultaneously in a controlled manner (70% body weight). Measurements on the axial image of computed tomography were: syndesmotic area (SA), fibular rotation (FR), position of the fibula in the sagittal plane (FPS), depth of the incisura (ID), anterior direct difference (ADD), middle direct difference (MDD) and posterior direct difference (PDD). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the variable syndesmotic area between healthy (mean=-0.14, SD=4.33) and diseased (mean=16.82, SD=12.3)(p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the variables ADD, MDD, PDD, ID, FPS and FR. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of syndesmotic area employing axial force and forced foot positions using the ASLD may be useful for the diagnosis of subtle tibiofibular syndesmosis instability.

Tibiotalocalcaneal nailing for osteoporotic ankle fractures in the frail patient: a narrative review with a clinical score proposal for the decision-making process.

Osteoporotic ankle fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture, known as 'low-energy' trauma, such as those equivalent to a fall from a standing height or less. Osteoporotic ankle fractures in frail patients are becoming more and more frequent in daily practice and represent a therapeutic challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The main problems with frail patients are the poor condition of the soft tissues around the ankle, dependence for activities of daily living and high comorbidity. The decision to operate on these patients is complex because conservative treatment is poorly tolerated in unstable fractures and conventional open reduction and internal fixation is associated with a high rate of complications. The authors conducted a narrative review of the literature on primary tibiotalocalcaneal nailing of ankle fractures in frail patients and categorized the different factors to consider when treatment is indicated for this conditon. Difficulty of ambulation, age over 65 years old, deteriorated baseline state and instability of the fracture were the most frequently considered factors. Finally, the authors propose an easy and quick clinical scoring system to help in the decision-making process, although further comparative studies are required to explore its validity.

Infected unstable Charcot ankle neuroarthropathy, any hope before amputation? A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a destructive disease characterized by progressive bony fragmentation as a result of the isolated or accumulative trauma in patients with decreased sensation that manifests as dislocation, periarticular fractures, and instability. In this study, we present the results of salvage procedure of the ankle Charcot neuroarthropathy using aggressive debridement and Ilizarov frame fusion with early weight bearing. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with severely infected ulcerated and unstable Charcot neuroarthropathy of the ankle were treated between 2013 and 2018. The mean age was 63.5 ± 7.9 years; 16 males and seven females. Aggressive open debridement of ulcers and joint surfaces, with talectomy in some cases, was performed followed by external fixation with an Ilizarov frame along with early weight-bearing. The primary outcome was a stable plantigrade infection-free foot and ankle that allows weight-bearing in accommodative footwear. RESULTS: Limb salvage was achieved in 91.3% of cases at the end of a mean follow-up time of 19 months (range: 17-29). Fifteen (71.4%) solid bony unions evident clinically and radiographically were achieved, while six (28.5%) patients developed stable painless pseudarthrosis. Two patients had below-knee amputations due to uncontrolled infection. CONCLUSION: Aggressive debridement and arthrodesis using ring external fixation can be used successfully to salvage severely infected Charcot arthropathy of the ankle. Pin tract infection, delayed wound healing, and stress fracture may complicate the procedure but can be easily managed. Amputation may be the last resort in uncontrolled infection.

Analysis of the uninjured tibiofibular syndesmosis using conventional CT-imaging and axial force in different foot positions.

BACKGROUND: Syndesmosis measurments and indices have been controversial and showed interindividual variability. The purpose of this study was to analyze, by conventional axial computed tomography images and a simulated load device, the uninjured tibiofibular syndesmosis under axial force and forced foot positions. METHODS: A total of 15 healthy patients (30 ankles) were studied using adjustable simulated load device (ASLD). This device allowed to perform bilateral ankle CT scans in two forced foot and ankle positions (30° of plantar flexion, 15° of inversion, 20° of internal rotation and 15° of dorsal flexion, 15° of eversion, 30° of external rotation). Axial load was applied simultaneously in a controlled manner (70% body weight). Measurements on the axial image of computed tomography were: syndesmotic area (SA), fibular rotation (FR), position of the fibula in the sagittal plane (FPS), depth of the incisura (ID) and direct anterior difference (ADD), direct middle difference (MDD) and direct posterior difference (PDD). RESULTS: In patients without injury to the tibiofibular syndesmosis, the application of axial load and forced foot and ankle positions showed statistically significant differences on the distal tibiofibular measurements between the stressed and the relaxed position, it also showed interindividual variability : SA (median = 4.12 [IQR = 2.42, 6.63]) (p < 0.001), ADD (0.67 [0.14, 0.67]) (p < 0.001), MDD(0.45, [0.05, 0.9]) (p < 0.001), PDD (0.73 [-0.05, 0.73]) (p < 0.002). However, it did not detect statistically significant differences when the tibiofibular differences between the stressed and the relaxed position in one ankle were compared with the contralateral side: SA (-0.14, SD = 4.33 [95% CI = -2.53, 2.26]), ADD (-0.42, 1.08 [-1.02, 0.18]), MDD (0.29, 0.54 [-0.01, 0.59]), PDD (-0.1, 1.42 [-0.89, 0.68]). Interobserver reliability showed an Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.990 [95% CI = 0.972, 0.997]. CONCLUSIONS: Wide interindividual variability was observed in all syndesmotic measurements, but no statistically significant differences were found when comparing one ankle to the contralateral side. Measuring syndesmosis alignment parameters, may only be of value, if those are compared to the contralateral ankle.

Functional results and quality of life after joint preserving or sacrificing surgery in Charcot-Marie-Tooth foot deformities.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional results, quality of life, and complications in two groups of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) patients according to the type of surgical operations, joint preserving, or joint sacrificing surgery. METHODS: Fifty-two feet in forty-six patients with CMT who had undergone surgical deformity correction were divided into two groups based on the main surgical procedure for the correction: Class I (joint preserving surgery) and class II (joint sacrificing surgery). Foot ankle disability index (FADI) and short form 12 version 2 (SF12V2) were documented pre-operative and 12 months post-operative. The complications of both groups were monitored with a mean follow-up time of 20.5 months (range, 13-71.5). RESULTS: After surgical treatment, FADI scores showed differences (p=0.005) between both groups. The functional improvement was 29 (20-46; p<0.001) in class I and 10 (2-36; p=0.001) in class II. The patients in both groups acquired a better quality of life as demonstrated in physical component summary of SF12 but without statistically difference. Three feet needed reintervention in class I (two for cavovarus recurrence and one for hallux flexus) at the end of follow-up. In contrast, five feet needed a new operation for cavovarus recurrence, claw toes recurrence, and ankle osteoarthritis after the progression of the condition. DISCUSSION: An early surgical intervention to neutralize the deforming forces in CMT patients could be a useful strategy to delay or prevent the need for extensive reconstruction and potential future complications. CONCLUSION: Based on the type of surgical intervention in CMT patients, the joint preserving surgery in addition to soft tissue balancing procedures obtained better functional outcomes and lower rate of complications when compared to the group of joint sacrificing surgery.

Debridement and hinged motion distraction is superior to debridement alone in patients with ankle osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare complication rates and postoperative outcomes in patients with ankle debridement alone vs. debridement and hinged ankle distraction arthroplasty. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis (OA) with a mean age of 40.0 ± 8.5 years were included into this prospective randomized study: 25 patients in ankle debridement alone group and 25 patients in debridement and hinged ankle distraction group. The mean follow-up was 46 ± 12 months (range 36-78 months). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at the 6-month and 3-year follow-up using the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, SF-36 quality of life score, and van Dijk OA classification. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to calculate the 3-year and 5-year survival rates. RESULTS: Both patient groups experienced significant pain relief, functional improvement, and improvement in quality of life postoperatively. In total, 26 major secondary procedures were performed. The overall survival rates in the debridement and ankle distraction group were 19 of 25 (74%) and 15 of 25 (59%) at 3 years and 5 years, respectively. The overall survival rates in the ankle debridement alone group were 12 of 25 (49%) and 9 of 25 (34%) at 3 years and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated comparable postoperative functional outcome and quality of life. However, rate of postoperative revision surgery was substantially higher in ankle debridement alone group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled study, Level I.

Medial Ankle Instability: The Deltoid Dilemma.

Diagnosis and treatment of medial ankle instability (MAI) are still controversial and poorly discussed in literature. The purpose of this review is to highlight different clinical presentations of MAI and develop a guide for its management. The deltoid ligament complex is injured more commonly than expected, because deltoid ligament injuries may either be isolated or occur in combination with other lesions, such as lateral ankle ligament injury, posterior tibial tendon insufficiency, osteochondral lesion, and others. The presence of a pes planovalgus deformity in a patient without posterior tibial tendon insufficiency may indicate MAI.

How To Diagnose and Treat Infection in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic infection after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a serious complication, often requiring revision surgery, including revision arthroplasty, conversion to ankle arthrodesis, or even amputation. Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle infection include prior surgery at the site of infection, low functional preoperative score, diabetes, and wound healing problems. The clinical presentation of patients with periprosthetic ankle joint infection can be variable and dependent on infection manifestation: acute versus chronic. The initial evaluation in patients with suspected periprosthetic joint infections should include blood tests: C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis can help confirm suspected periprosthetic ankle infection.