Remando a contracorriente / Rowing against the current

At Lalonde we know that the determinants that most influence the health of the population are lifestyle, genetics and the environment. Health represents only 10% and is the determinant that consumes the most resources. It has been shown that a salutogenic approach focused on the social determinants of health and the support of public policies to improve the environment are more efficient in the long term than medicine focused on hospitals, technology and super-specialization. Primary Care (PC) that has an approach centered on the person and families with a community vision, is the ideal level to provide health care, and to influence lifestyles. However it is not invested in PC. In this article we review the socioeconomic and political factors that globally influence the lack of interest in the development of PC.(AU)

Desde Lalonde sabemos que los determinantes que más influyen en la Salud de la población son el estilo de vida, la genética y el entorno. La sanidad representa solo el 10% y es el determinante que más recursos consume. Está demostrado que un enfoque salutogénico centrado en los determinantes sociales de la salud y el apoyo de políticas públicas para mejorar el entorno, son más eficientes a largo plazo que la medicina centrada en los hospitales, la tecnología y la superespecialización. La Atención Primaria (AP) que tiene un enfoque centrado en la persona y las familias con una visión comunitaria, es el nivel idóneo para proveer atención sanitaria, y para influir en los estilos de vida. Sin embargo no se invierte en AP. En este artículo revisamos los condicionantes socioeconómicos y políticos que influyen de manera global en la falta de interés en el desarrollo de la AP.(AU)

Feasibility and Acceptability of Personalized Breast Cancer Screening (DECIDO Study): A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial.

The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering risk-based breast cancer screening and its integration into regular clinical practice. A single-arm proof-of-concept trial was conducted with a sample of 387 women aged 40-50 years residing in the city of Lleida (Spain). The study intervention consisted of breast cancer risk estimation, risk communication and screening recommendations, and a follow-up. A polygenic risk score with 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms was used to update the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk model and estimate the 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer. The women expressed a positive attitude towards varying the frequency of breast screening according to individual risk and, especially, more frequently inviting women at higher-than-average risk. A lower intensity screening for women at lower risk was not as welcome, although half of the participants would accept it. Knowledge of the benefits and harms of breast screening was low, especially with regard to false positives and overdiagnosis. The women expressed a high understanding of individual risk and screening recommendations. The participants' intention to participate in risk-based screening and satisfaction at 1-year were very high.

Avances hacia el cribado personalizado del cáncer de mama: el papel de la Atención Primaria / Moving toward personalized breast cancer screening: The role of Primary Care

El cáncer de mama es la primera causa de muerte en el mundo entre las mujeres. El Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) introdujo el cribado poblacional de cáncer de mama en 1990. Como en la mayoría de los programas europeos, el riesgo se identifica con base en la edad y se ofrece una mamografía cada dos años a mujeres de 50 a 69 años. La evidencia científica está avanzando hacia un cribado personalizado, basado en el riesgo individual. En este artículo se presentan los ensayos clínicos que evaluarán la eficacia del cribado personalizado y algunos estudios realizados en nuestro entorno sobre el efecto de informar a las mujeres de los beneficios y efectos adversos del cribado o la aceptabilidad y viabilidad de ofrecer cribado personalizado, que incluya la toma de decisiones compartidas. El Programa de Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud puede ayudar a transformar el cribado en nuestro SNS.(AU)

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death in the world among women. The Spanish National Health System (SNHS) introduced population-based breast cancer screening in 1990. As in most European programs, risk is identified on the basis of age and a mammogram is offered every two years to women aged 50–69 years. Scientific evidence is moving toward personalized screening, based on individual risk. This article presents the clinical trials that will evaluate the efficacy of personalized screening and some studies carried out in our environment on the effect of informing women of the benefits and adverse effects of screening or the acceptability and feasibility of offering personalized screening, in the Shared Decision Making context. The Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Program can help transform screening in our SNHS.(AU)

[Moving toward personalized breast cancer screening: The role of Primary Care]. / Avances hacia el cribado personalizado del cáncer de mama: el papel de la Atención Primaria.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death in the world among women. The Spanish National Health System (SNHS) introduced population-based breast cancer screening in 1990. As in most European programs, risk is identified on the basis of age and a mammogram is offered every two years to women aged 50-69 years. Scientific evidence is moving toward personalized screening, based on individual risk. This article presents the clinical trials that will evaluate the efficacy of personalized screening and some studies carried out in our environment on the effect of informing women of the benefits and adverse effects of screening or the acceptability and feasibility of offering personalized screening, in the Shared Decision Making context. The Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Program can help transform screening in our SNHS.

Un día en la consulta de Medicina de Familia entre las olas de la pandemia / A day at the family physician’s surgery between the waves of the pandemic

Los cambios organizativos que se hicieron durante la pandemia se vivieron como una oportunidad de desarrollar prácticas de valor y resolutivas, priorizar intervenciones que han demostrado eficacia y dejar de hacer lo que no deberíamos hacer. Después de varias olas, la Atención Primaria (AP) ha aumentado considerablemente el número de visitas, principalmente por motivos no clínicos (casi un 60%) y, entre estos, consultas de bajo valor, banales o poco oportunas. Destacan la repetición de derivaciones por anulaciones y rechazo de visitas desde el segundo nivel asistencial, la petición de informes y certificados por múltiples motivos no médicos, las incapacidades temporales (IT) por contactos con positivos de COVID y las consultas relacionadas con la vacunación COVID. Parte de la población ha vivido los cambios como una falta de accesibilidad, lo que ha aumentado la agresividad hacia el personal sanitario. Los médicos y médicas de familia manifiestan impotencia, pérdida de la ilusión, falta de tiempo, desbordamiento, hartazgo, sensación de que no se hace medicina y de que «no hay salida». La AP está al borde del colapso por un trabajo cada vez menos clínico que hace que se deje de atender a los verdaderos enfermos. Y no parece haber una voluntad política de incrementar el presupuesto para una AP que la Organización Mundial para la Salud (OMS) recomendó reforzar para hacer frente a la pandemia, y que ha demostrado que puede alcanzar mejores resultados en términos de salud, equidad y eficiencia y ser garante de la sostenibilidad económica y social del sistema sanitario.(AU)

Organisational changes made during the COVID-19 pandemic were seen as an opportunity to develop valuable and resolutive tasks, to prioritise interventions that have proven effective and to stop doing what we should never do. After several waves, visits to Primary Care providers have increased significantly, mainly for non-clinical reasons (almost 60%), and among these, consultations with little value, which are banal or poorly justified. The repetition of referral requests due to cancellations and the rejection of appointments from second level care, the demand for medical reports and certificates for multiple non-medical issues, temporary work disability due to COVID-19 close contacts and queries related to the COVID-19 vaccination are common. These changes have often been seen as a lack of accessibility, increasing aggressive attitudes towards health workers. Family doctors reveal powerlessness, deception, a lack of time, overflow, the feeling of not working as a doctor and that there is no way out. Primary Care is near to collapse due to these non-clinical tasks that do not leave time for patients who are truly ill. Politicians have not shown a will to increase the budget for Primary Care, which the WHO advised be strengthened in order to deal with the pandemic. It has shown to achieve better results in terms of health equity and efficiency, and must be the guarantee of the economic and social health system sustainability.(AU)

Feasibility Assessment of the Let's Walk Programme (CAMINEM): Exercise Training and Health Promotion in Primary Health-Care Settings.

Exercise is related to many individual health outcomes but impact evaluations of exercise programmes are seldom conducted. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of an exercise prescription intervention in primary health-care settings (CAMINEM Programme) located in two socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods. The CAMINEM was a pragmatic-driven intervention with opportunistic recruitment. It followed the 5As framework for health promotion and also the exercise training principles. Feasibility was evaluated using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance). Patients with non-communicable chronic diseases participated in a 12-month home-based moderate-intensity exercise program, counselled by exercise physiologists. Participants were grouped according to their physical activity behaviour at baseline and 6-month adherence. CAMINEM reached 1.49% (n = 229) of the eligible population (N = 15374) and included a final sample of 178. Health outcomes for adhered participants followed positive patterns. Non-adhered participants visited their practitioner more compared to adhered participants. Thirty-three practitioners (40%) referred patients. Nurses referred four times more than physicians (81% and 19% respectively). The delivery of exercise prescriptions proved to be easy to complete and record by participants as well as easy to monitor and adjust by the exercise physiologists. One out of four participants adhered during the 12-month intervention. This intervention has been feasible in primary care in Catalonia, Spain, to safely prescribe home-based exercise for several conditions.

Feasibility and acceptability of personalised breast cancer screening (DECIDO study): protocol of a single-arm proof-of-concept trial.

INTRODUCTION: Personalised cancer screening aims to improve benefits, reduce harms and being more cost-effective than age-based screening. The objective of the DECIDO study is to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering risk-based personalised breast cancer screening and its integration in regular clinical practice in a National Health System setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a single-arm proof-of-concept trial. The study sample will include 385 women aged 40-50 years resident in a primary care health area in Spain. The study intervention consists of (1) a baseline visit; (2) breast cancer risk estimation; (3) a second visit for risk communication and screening recommendations based on breast cancer risk and (4) a follow-up to obtain the study outcomes.A polygenic risk score (PRS) will be constructed as a composite likelihood ratio of 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk model, including age, race/ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, benign breast disease and breast density will be used to estimate a preliminary 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer. A Bayesian approach will be used to update this risk with the PRS value.The primary outcome measures will be attitude towards, intention to participate in and satisfaction with personalised breast cancer screening. Secondary outcomes will include the proportions of women who accept to participate and who complete the different phases of the study. The exact binomial and the Student's t-test will be used to obtain 95% CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Drug Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova. The trial will be conducted in compliance with this study protocol, the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice.The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated in scientific conferences and media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03791008.

Aunando esfuerzos en Prevención y Promoción de la Salud con el PAPPS / Joining efforts in prevention and health promotion with the PAPPS

No disponible

Efficacy and safety of topical application of 15% and 10% potassium hydroxide for the treatment of Molluscum contagiosum.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Molluscum contagiosum is the most common skin infection in children. One topical treatment used for Molluscum contagiosum is potassium hydroxide. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of potassium hydroxide topical treatment at different concentrations with that of placebo in terms of complete clearing of Molluscum contagiosum lesions and to assess the safety and tolerance of potassium hydroxide topical treatment. METHODS: This was a double-blind randomized clinical trial of three treatments (potassium hydroxide 10%, potassium hydroxide 15%, placebo) applied once daily up to complete clearing of lesions (maximum duration 60 days) in 53 children aged 2-6 years in primary health care pediatric offices in Catalonia, Spain. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, potassium hydroxide 10% (58.8%, P = .03) and potassium hydroxide 15% (64.3%, P = .02) had efficacy superior to that of placebo (18.8%). The number of Molluscum contagiosum lesions was significantly reduced with potassium hydroxide 10% and 15%. The main efficacy outcome was achieved in 58.8% of children in the potassium hydroxide 10% group (P = .03 vs placebo) and in 64.3% of children in the potassium hydroxide 15% group (P = .02 vs placebo). Potassium hydroxide 10% and 15% were not significantly different in efficacy from each other. Potassium hydroxide 10% and placebo were better tolerated than potassium hydroxide 15%. No adverse events were reported during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Potassium hydroxide 10% and 15% demonstrated high rates of efficacy in clearing Molluscum contagiosum lesions, with potassium hydroxide 10% being better tolerated.

Análisis poblacional de la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada en ancianos según criterios STOPP/START (estudio STARTREC) / Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older Spanish population according to STOPP/START criteria (STARTREC study)

OBJETIVO: Racionalizar la prescripción en la población anciana es una prioridad de los sistemas sanitarios. Los criterios STOPP/START permiten detectar la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) a nivel individual. Su aplicación a nivel poblacional permite determinar la prevalencia de PPI y su relación con diversas variables del paciente y del sistema sanitario. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la prevalencia de PPI en población anciana a partir de bases de datos clínicos y de farmacia. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo transversal. Emplazamiento: Ámbito de atención primaria de la Región Sanitaria de Lleida, España. PARTICIPANTES: Se incluyen 45.408 pacientes de 70 años o más atendidos en los centros de salud como mínimo una vez en el último año. Mediciones principales: Se calcula la frecuencia de incumplimiento de 43 indicadores STOPP y 12 indicadores START, a partir de los fármacos prescritos durante un año y se ajustan modelos de regresión logística para evaluar su asociación con diversas variables. RESULTADOS: El 58% son mujeres. La edad media es de 79,7 años. El 58,1% incumplen como mínimo un criterio STOPP y/o START, relacionados principalmente con el uso de benzodiacepinas, antiinflamatorios no esteroideos e inhibidores de la bomba de protones por exceso, y los tratamientos para la osteoporosis, antiagregantes, estatinas, metformina y betabloqueantes por omisión. La PPI aumenta con la edad y la polifarmacia y es superior en pacientes ingresados en centros geriátricos y domiciliarios que en los ambulatorios. CONCLUSIONES: Los criterios STOPP/START identifican PPI en más de la mitad de pacientes ancianos de una región sanitaria española

OBJECTIVE: Rational prescribing in older people is a priority for health care organizations. The STOPP/START screening tool has been developed to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in individuals. In a primary care setting, STOPP/START can estimate PIP prevalence and related factors at population level. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence rates of PPI in elderly population using clinical and prescription claim databases. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population study. Settings: Primary Care, Lleida Health Region, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 45.408 patients 70 years old and over, attended in the primary health care centers at least once the last year. METHODS: 43 STOPP and 12 START criteria are applied to their 2012 clinical and prescription records. Logistic regression models are adjusted to determine PIP association with several factors. RESULTS: 45,408 patients are included. The mean age is 79.7 years, 58% being female. The overall prevalence of PPI is 58.1%. According to STOPP, the most common drugs identified are benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and proton pump inhibitors; according to START, osteoporosis treatments, antiplatelet agents, statins, metformin and beta blockers. PIP increases with age and polypharmacy and it is higher in long-term care facilities residents and patients receiving home health care. CONCLUSIONS: In our Health Region, at least 50% of the population aged 70 or older has one or more PIP, according to STOPP/START criteria

[Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older Spanish population according to STOPP/START criteria (STARTREC study)]. / Análisis poblacional de la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada en ancianos según criterios STOPP/START (estudio STARTREC).

OBJECTIVE: Rational prescribing in older people is a priority for health care organizations. The STOPP/START screening tool has been developed to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in individuals. In a primary care setting, STOPP/START can estimate PIP prevalence and related factors at population level. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence rates of PPI in elderly population using clinical and prescription claim databases. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population study. SETTINGS: Primary Care, Lleida Health Region, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 45.408 patients 70 years old and over, attended in the primary health care centers at least once the last year. METHODS: 43 STOPP and 12 START criteria are applied to their 2012 clinical and prescription records. Logistic regression models are adjusted to determine PIP association with several factors. RESULTS: 45,408 patients are included. The mean age is 79.7 years, 58% being female. The overall prevalence of PPI is 58.1%. According to STOPP, the most common drugs identified are benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and proton pump inhibitors; according to START, osteoporosis treatments, antiplatelet agents, statins, metformin and beta blockers. PIP increases with age and polypharmacy and it is higher in long-term care facilities residents and patients receiving home health care. CONCLUSIONS: In our Health Region, at least 50% of the population aged 70 or older has one or more PIP, according to STOPP/START criteria.

Effectiveness of a Multi-Component Intervention for Overweight and Obese Children (Nereu Program): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of childhood obesity is a complex challenge for primary health care professionals. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Nereu Program in improving anthropometric parameters, physical activity and sedentary behaviours, and dietary intake. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial comparing Nereu Program and usual counselling group interventions in primary care settings. The 8-month study recruited 113 children aged 6 to 12 years with overweight/obesity. Before recruitment, eligible participants were randomly allocated to an intensive, family-based multi-component behavioural intervention (Nereu Program group) or usual advice from their paediatrician on healthy eating and physical activity. Anthropometric parameters, objectively measured sedentary and physical activity behaviours, and dietary intake were evaluated pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: At the end of the study period, both groups achieved a similar decrease in body mass index (BMIsd) compared to baseline. Nereu Program participants (n = 54) showed greater increases in moderate-intense physical activity (+6.27% vs. -0.61%, p<0.001) and daily fruit servings (+0.62 vs. +0.13, p<0.026), and decreased daily soft drinks consumption (-0.26 vs. -0.02, p<0.047), respectively, compared to the counselling group (n = 59). CONCLUSIONS: At the end of the 8-month intervention, participants in the Nereu Program group showed improvement in physical activity and dietary behaviours, compared to the counselling group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01878994.

Pacientes con el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca en Atención Primaria: envejecimiento, comorbilidad y polifarmacia / Heart failure patients in Primary Care: aging, comorbidities and polypharmacy

ObjetivoDescribir el perfil clínico y de consumo farmacológico de los pacientes con registro diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) en una región sanitaria, a partir de los registros informáticos. Ver si existen diferencias por sexos.DiseñoEstudio descriptivo transversal multicéntrico.EmplazamientoRegión Sanitaria de Lleida.ParticipantesToda la población adscrita a 21 centros de salud, diagnosticada de IC (3.017 de 306.229).Mediciones principalesDatos demográficos, comorbilidades y subgrupos terapéuticos en pacientes con el diagnóstico de IC en la historia clínica.ResultadosRegistro de IC 0,99%, 59% mujeres, media de edad 80 años. Antecedentes: hipertensión 67%, fibrilación auricular (FA) 31%, diabetes (DM2) 30%, obesidad 27%, dislipemia 26,5%, asma/EPOC 26%, cardiopatía isquémica (CI) 19%, accidente vascular cerebral (AVC) 11%, e insuficiencia renal (IR) 12%. Hipertensión, dislipemia y obesidad son más frecuentes en mujeres y EPOC, CI e IR en hombres. No hay diferencias en DM2, AVC ni FA. Mediana de consumo de subgrupos terapéuticos por paciente durante el 2007 de 8 (P25=6 y P75=11). Las mujeres tienen mayor prescripción de diuréticos (76% vs 71%), glucósidos cardíacos (22% vs 19.3%) e IECA/ARAII (68% vs 64%) y los hombres de tratamiento combinado IECA/ARAII+beta bloqueantes (26,9% vs 23,5%). Hay una tendencia a mayor prescripción de estos últimos en hombres sin ser significativa.ConclusionesLos pacientes diagnosticados de IC en Atención Primaria son de edad muy avanzada, presentan pluripatología asociada y consumen muchos fármacos. Existen diferencias por sexos tanto en factores de riesgo cardiovascular y enfermedades asociadas como en el perfil de consumo farmacológico(AU)

ObjectiveTo assess heart failure prevalence, epidemiology, co-morbidities and polypharmacy in our region from electronic patient records. To evaluate gender differences in heart failure patients.DesignDescriptive, cross-sectional study.SettingPrimary care Lleida (Spain).ParticipantsAll patients from 21 primary care centers with the diagnosis of heart failure in medical records were included.Main outcome measurementsDemografic data, comorbidities and therapeutical subgroups in patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in their clinical record.ResultsHeart failure was found in 0.99% (3017 from 306229 patients), of whom 59% were women, and a mean age of 80 years. Comorbidities: hypertension 67%, diabetes 30%, hyperlipidemia 26.5%, obesity 27%, ischemic heart disease 19%, stroke 11%, atrial fibrillation 31%, COPD 26%, renal failure 12%. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obesity were more frequent in women, COPD, ischemic heart disease and renal failure in men. There were no differences in diabetes, stroke and atrial fibrillation. Patients were prescribed a median of 8 different therapeutic subgroups (P25=6 and P75=11). Women were more frequently prescribed diuretics (76%), cardiac glycosides (22%) and ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and men ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists in combination with beta-blockers.ConclusionsHeart failure patients in primary care are elderly, with significant co-morbidities and treated with a high number of drugs. Gender differences exist in cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, and also in therapy(AU)

[Heart failure patients in Primary Care: aging, comorbidities and polypharmacy]. / Pacientes con el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca en Atención Primaria: envejecimiento, comorbilidad y polifarmacia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess heart failure prevalence, epidemiology, co-morbidities and polypharmacy in our region from electronic patient records. To evaluate gender differences in heart failure patients. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care Lleida (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: All patients from 21 primary care centers with the diagnosis of heart failure in medical records were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Demographic data, comorbidities and therapeutical subgroups in patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in their clinical record. RESULTS: Heart failure was found in 0.99% (3017 from 306229 patients), of whom 59% were women, and a mean age of 80 years. Comorbidities: hypertension 67%, diabetes 30%, hyperlipidemia 26.5%, obesity 27%, ischemic heart disease 19%, stroke 11%, atrial fibrillation 31%, COPD 26%, renal failure 12%. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obesity were more frequent in women, COPD, ischemic heart disease and renal failure in men. There were no differences in diabetes, stroke and atrial fibrillation. Patients were prescribed a median of 8 different therapeutic subgroups (P25=6 and P75=11). Women were more frequently prescribed diuretics (76%), cardiac glycosides (22%) and ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and men ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists in combination with beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients in primary care are elderly, with significant co-morbidities and treated with a high number of drugs. Gender differences exist in cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, and also in therapy.