Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Rev Infirm ; 66(230): 14-17, 2017 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28366250

ABSTRACT

In November 2015, in Paris, a wave of terrorist attacks brought horror to France. The medical and nursing teams were severely tested but demonstrated efficiency and courage. The organisation of the emergency response requires fast and essential decision making and actions.


Subject(s)
Emergencies , Emergency Medical Services , Terrorism , Humans , Paris
3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 20(5): 637-42, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27018547

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), chest compression interruptions or hands-off time (HOT) affect the prognosis. Our aim was to measure HOT due to the application of an automated chest compression device (ACD) by an advanced life support team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational case series report since the introduction of a new method of installing the ACD. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years old with OHCA who were treated with an ACD (Lucas 2(TM), Physio-Control). The ACD application was indicated only for OHCA patients transported to a hospital for Extra Corporeal Life Support (ECLS). We recorded the HOT related to switching from manual to mechanical chest compressions. An ACD consists of dorsal and ventral components, which can be installed either in one or in two steps, separated from a chest compression sequence. HOT was expressed as a median number of seconds [interquartile range]. RESULTS: From January 1, 2012 to January 15, 2013, 30 patients were included. In the case of ACD application in one phase (n = 16), the median HOT was 25.3 s [19.8-30.5]. With regard to patients with an ACD application in two phases (n = 14), the median HOT was, respectively, 9.8 s [7.8-17] and 12.4 s [9.5-16.2], that is, a median global HOT of 23.6 s [19-27.6]. HOT was not different between ACD applications in one or two phases (p = 0.52). For a two phase application, the median chest compression time between the two manipulations was 14.2 s [6.4-18]. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between techniques in the application of the Lucas 2(TM) device in terms of HOT. The short time needed to apply the device lends itself well to use as a primary chest compression modality during cardiac arrest as well as a bridge to novel resuscitation strategies (ECLS). A further study is currently underway with a larger number of ECLS patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Massage/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Adult , Aged , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...