Long-term albumin administration in decompensated cirrhosis (ANSWER): an open-label randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is scarce on the efficacy of long-term human albumin (HA) administration in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The human Albumin for the treatmeNt of aScites in patients With hEpatic ciRrhosis (ANSWER) study was designed to clarify this issue. METHODS: We did an investigator-initiated multicentre randomised, parallel, open-label, pragmatic trial in 33 academic and non-academic Italian hospitals. We randomly assigned patients with cirrhosis and uncomplicated ascites who were treated with anti-aldosteronic drugs (≥200 mg/day) and furosemide (≥25 mg/day) to receive either standard medical treatment (SMT) or SMT plus HA (40 g twice weekly for 2 weeks, and then 40 g weekly) for up to 18 months. The primary endpoint was 18-month mortality, evaluated as difference of events and analysis of survival time in patients included in the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2008-000625-19, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01288794. FINDINGS: From April 2, 2011, to May 27, 2015, 440 patients were randomly assigned and 431 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 38 of 218 patients died in the SMT plus HA group and 46 of 213 in the SMT group. Overall 18-month survival was significantly higher in the SMT plus HA than in the SMT group (Kaplan-Meier estimates 77% vs 66%; p=0·028), resulting in a 38% reduction in the mortality hazard ratio (0·62 [95% CI 0·40-0·95]). 46 (22%) patients in the SMT group and 49 (22%) in the SMT plus HA group had grade 3-4 non-liver related adverse events. INTERPRETATION: In this trial, long-term HA administration prolongs overall survival and might act as a disease modifying treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. FUNDING: Italian Medicine Agency.

Monoclonal gammopathy after liver transplantation: a risk factor for long-term medical complications other than malignancies.

The aims of the study were to evaluate (i) the prevalence of MGUS in patients after liver transplantation (LT), (ii) the role of MGUS as a risk factor for malignancy and other medical complications after LT. One hundred and fifty consecutive patients were included in the study and followed prospectively after LT for more than 18 months. Eighteen patients had MGUS before LT, whereas 49 patients developed MGUS after LT ('de novo' MGUS). Thirty-six of these patients showed a MGUS along all the follow up after LT ('permanent' MGUS). In 31 patients, MGUS disappeared after LT ('transient' MGUS). No patient with MGUS developed B-malignant lymphoproliferative disorder and only one patient developed a myeloma after LT. Comparing patients with 'permanent' MGUS to patients with 'transient' MGUS or without MGUS after LT, the former group showed a higher rate of serious infections (30% versus 13%, P = 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (75% versus 44%, P = 0.001) and mortality (33% versus 17%, P = 0.04). Permanent MGUS was confirmed as an independent risk factor for serious infections and CKD by multivariate analysis. Permanent MGUS after LT does not entail a significant risk of malignancy, but it is associated with a higher risk of serious infections and CKD.

Nifedipine versus carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after liver transplantation: results of a controlled clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to compare nifedipine and carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The study included 50 patients who developed arterial hypertension after OLT. Twenty-five patients received nifedipine (group A), and 25 received carvedilol (group B). Patients were defined as intolerant to nifedipine or carvedilol if severe adverse effects developed. These patients stopped the first drug and were switched to the other one. Patients were defined as full responders to monotherapy if there was normalization of blood pressure, and they were defined as partial responders by the need to add a second antihypertensive drug, ramipril. The 2 groups of patients were similar for baseline conditions. At the end of the study, patients intolerant to monotherapy were 48% of group A and 12.5% of group B (P < 0.01). Full responders were 20% of group A and 33.33% of group B (P < 0.01). Partial responders were 22% of group A and 54.1% of group B (P < 0.01). The addition of ramipril normalized blood pressure in 19% of partial responders to monotherapy (75% in partial responders to nifedipine and 30% in partial responders to carvedilol, P < 0.01). In responders to either monotherapy or combined therapy, there was a significant improvement of renal function. In responders to carvedilol, but not in responders to nifedipine, the daily dose of tacrolimus at 1 year should be reduced to 50% compared to the baseline dose to maintain the blood trough level in the therapeutic range.

The role of nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of systemic and splanchnic vasodilation in cirrhotic rats before and after the onset of ascites.

BACKGROUND: The role of nitric oxide (NO) in the pathogenesis of splanchnic arterial vasodilation in cirrhosis has been recently debated by some experimental studies. AIMS: We investigated the role of NO in the pathogenesis of the splanchnic arterial vasodilation along the course of CCl(4)-induced experimental cirrhosis. METHODS: We analyzed the effect on mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and resistance in the superior mesenteric artery (RSMA), before and after the administration of a unspecific NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor (Nomega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester, L-NAME) and a specific NOS2 inhibitor (L-N-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine, L-NIL) to cirrhotic rats with and without ascites, and to control rats. NOS2 and NOS3 protein expression was also assessed in systemic and splanchnic arteries of these animals. RESULTS: L-NAME in cirrhotic rats markedly improved MAP, and TPR and decreased CO regardless of whether they had ascites or not. L-NIL did not produce any significant effect on systemic haemodynamics in control and cirrhotic rats. NOS3 overexpression in the aorta of cirrhotic animals paralleled the progression of the liver disease. L-NAME increased RSMA in cirrhotic rats, but this effect was much less intense in rats with ascites. L-NIL had an effect only on RSMA in rats with ascites, which was of a similar extent to that produced by L-NAME. Western blot experiment showed a faint overexpression of NOS3 in the mesenteric artery of cirrhotic rats with and without ascites and a clear induction of NOS2 only in the mesenteric artery of rats with ascites. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that NO contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of arterial splanchnic circulation in the early stages of experimental cirrhosis but has only a minor role in its maintenance after the development of ascites. Furthermore, the expression of the different NOS isoforms varies along the course of the liver disease.

Comparison between two high-dose methylprednisolone schedules in the treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: a controlled clinical trial.

Intravenous methylprednisolone is used in most liver transplant centers as first-line therapy of acute hepatic cellular rejection in patients who undergo liver transplant. However, no controlled study has been performed to date to define the optimal dose and duration of the steroid regimen. The schedules that actually are used in most transplant centers are drawn from those that were developed empirically for the treatment of acute renal graft rejection. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare two schedules of steroid treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection among those most widely used. Thirty-eight eligible patients with grade II or III acute hepatic cellular rejection were randomized to receive two different high-dose methylprednisolone schedules. Eighteen patients were randomized in group A (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d). Twenty patients were randomized in group B (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days). The response to treatment was evaluated by means of a second liver biopsy. The treatment of group A proved to be more effective than treatment of group B. The resolution of acute hepatic cellular rejection was observed in 83.3% of cases in group A and 50.0% of cases in group B (P <.05). The treatment of group A proved to be safer also than treatment of group B. Patients randomized in group B showed a higher prevalence of infections (90.0% of cases versus 55.5% of cases; P <.01) mainly because of bacterial (80.0% versus 50.0%; P <.05) and viral (50.0% versus 16.6%; P <.05) agents. In conclusion, the study shows that intravenous administration of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d is more effective and safer than intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in patients with liver transplantation.