Prevalence of RPGR-Mediated Retinal Dystrophy in an Unselected Cohort of Over 5000 Patients.

Purpose: Comprehensive genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) is challenged by difficult-to-sequence genomic regions, which are often mutational hotspots, such as RPGR ORF15. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic contribution of RPGR variants in an unselected IRD patient cohort referred for testing in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Methods: A total of 5201 consecutive patients were analyzed with a clinically validated next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay, including the difficult-to-sequence RPGR ORF15 region. Copy number variant (CNV) detection from NGS data was included. Variant interpretation was performed per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Results: A confirmed molecular diagnosis in RPGR was found in 4.5% of patients, 24.0% of whom were females. Variants in ORF15 accounted for 74% of the diagnoses; 29% of the diagnostic variants were in the most difficult-to-sequence central region of ORF15 (c.2470-3230). Truncating variants made up the majority (91%) of the diagnostic variants. CNVs explained 2% of the diagnostic cases, of which 80% were one- or two-exon deletions outside of ORF15. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that high-throughput, clinically validated NGS-based testing covering the difficult-to-sequence region of ORF15, in combination with high-resolution CNV detection, can help to maximize the diagnostic yield for patients with IRD. Translational Relevance: These results demonstrate an accurate and scalable method for the detection of RPGR-related variants, including the difficult-to-sequence ORF15 hotspot, which is relevant given current and emerging therapeutic opportunities.

Diagnostic utility of next-generation sequencing-based panel testing in 543 patients with suspected skeletal dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal dysplasia is typically diagnosed using a combination of radiographic imaging, clinical examinations, and molecular testing. Identifying a molecular diagnosis for an individual with a skeletal dysplasia can lead to improved clinical care, guide future medical management and treatment, and inform assessment of risk for familial recurrence. The molecular diagnostic utility of multi-gene panel testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has not yet been characterized for an unselected population of individuals with suspected skeletal dysplasia. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed patient reports to assess the diagnostic yield, reported variant characteristics, impact of copy number variation, and performance in prenatal diagnostics of panel tests for variants in genes associated with skeletal dysplasia and growth disorders. RESULTS: Clinical reports of consecutive patients with a clinical indication of suspected skeletal dysplasia who underwent panel testing were examined. The 543 patients included in the study submitted samples for diagnostic genetic testing with an indication of suspected skeletal dysplasia or growth disorder and received one of three nested panel tests. A molecular diagnosis was established in 42.0% of patients (n = 228/543). Diagnostic variants were identified in 71 genes, nearly half of which (n = 35, 49.3%) contributed uniquely to a molecular diagnosis for a single patient in this cohort. Diagnostic yield was significantly higher among fetal samples (58.0%, n = 51/88) than postnatal samples (38.9%, n = 177/455; z = 3.32, p < 0.0009). Diagnostic variants in fetal cases were identified across 18 genes. Thirteen diagnostic CNVs were reported, representing 5.7% of diagnostic findings and ranging in size from 241-bp to whole chromosome aneuploidy. Additionally, 11.4% (36/315) of non-diagnostic patient reports had suspicious variants of unknown significance (VUS), in which additional family studies that provide segregation data and/or functional characterization may result in reclassification to likely pathogenic. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the utility of panel testing for individuals with a suspected skeletal dysplasia or growth disorder, with a particularly high diagnostic yield seen in prenatal cases. Pursuing comprehensive panel testing with high-resolution CNV analysis can provide a diagnostic benefit, given the considerable phenotype overlap amongst skeletal dysplasia conditions.

Next-generation sequencing in childhood-onset epilepsies: Diagnostic yield and impact on neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) disease diagnosis.

Epilepsy is one of the most common childhood-onset neurological conditions with a genetic etiology. Genetic diagnosis provides potential for etiologically-based management and treatment. Existing research has focused on early-onset (<24 months) epilepsies; data regarding later-onset epilepsies is limited. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of a clinically available epilepsy panel in a selected pediatric epilepsy cohort with epilepsy onset between 24-60 months of life and evaluate whether this approach decreases the age of diagnosis of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2). Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based epilepsy panels, including genes associated with epileptic encephalopathies and inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) that present with epilepsy, were used. Copy-number variant (CNV) detection from NGS data was included. Variant interpretation was performed per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Results are reported from 211 consecutive patients with the following inclusion criteria: 24-60 months of age at the time of enrollment, first unprovoked seizure at/after 24 months, and at least one additional finding such as EEG/MRI abnormalities, speech delay, or motor symptoms. Median age was 42 months at testing and 30 months at first seizure onset; the mean delay from first seizure to comprehensive genetic testing was 10.3 months. A genetic diagnosis was established in 43 patients (20.4%). CNVs were reported in 25.6% diagnosed patients; 27.3% of CNVs identified were intragenic. Within the diagnosed cohort, 11 (25.6%) patients were diagnosed with an IEM. The predominant molecular diagnosis was CLN2 (14% of diagnosed patients). For these patients, diagnosis was achieved 12-24 months earlier than reported by natural history of the disease. This study supports comprehensive genetic testing for patients whose first seizure occurs ≥ 24 months of age. It also supports early application of testing in this age group, as the identified diagnoses can have significant impact on patient management and outcome.

Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers.

PURPOSE: Effective parental education about newborn blood-spot screening may facilitate prompt follow-up, reduce psychosocial harms, and promote trust in screening programs. However, little is known about the aspects of education delivery and content that are of most importance for fostering understanding and meeting parental expectations. We aimed to identify elements of newborn blood-spot screening education and their associations with mothers' knowledge and satisfaction levels. METHODS: We conducted a survey (by mail) of 1,712 mothers who were residing in Ontario, Canada, and whose infants had recently undergone newborn blood-spot screening. RESULTS: We received 750 completed questionnaires (response rate 47%). Factors associated with respondents' higher knowledge of newborn blood-spot screening were higher level of education (odds ratio = 2.79), English being spoken at home (odds ratio = 1.96), receiving an information sheet at the time of newborn blood-spot screening (odds ratio = 1.57), and receiving information about how to interpret the results (odds ratio = 2.65). Factors associated with being satisfied were: receiving information prenatally (odds ratio = 2.35), from a health-care professional (odds ratio = 4.54), or from an information sheet at the time of newborn blood-spot screening (odds ratio = 1.72); and receiving messages about the purpose of screening (odds ratio = 3.78), the communication process (odds ratio = 2.57), the interpretation of the results (odds ratio = 4.19), and sample-handling methods (odds ratio = 3.13). CONCLUSION: Promoting mothers' understanding and meeting their expectations with respect to education about newborn blood-spot screening may require greater engagement with prenatal providers. It also calls for a greater emphasis on communicating with mothers about how blood samples are handled and about the meaning of the test results.